Sentences with phrase «few simple laws»

In nature, a few simple laws can generate very complex systems.

Not exact matches

Laying out «a few principles» that he said he believes would be «useful to discuss and potentially codify into law», Zuckerberg first advocated for having «a simple and practical set of ways that you explain what you're doing with data», revealing an appetite to offload the problem of tricky privacy disclosures via a handy universal standard that can apply to all players.

Also, I never proposed that randomness created anything (I only argued that some simple set of laws of physics are all that need be behind the designs of nature that we observe), so I don't know why you are going on about randomness in your last few sentences.

With the simplest of methods for gathering the simplest of nourishment and with a few acts of healing, we have sufficient justification for abandoning: one of the ten commandments, a substantial body of religious law, a defining cultural activity and for setting aside all the spiritual and secular reasoning for honoring and holding sacred a day of rest and reflection — and replace it with professional sports, athletic competitions for children, travel and recreation, cultural activities and being open for business 24/7.

And there's no law (yet...) that says instead of pressing some crushed toasted nuts on the warm chocolate, go minimalist and simple sprinkle a few grains of flaky sea salt and roasted cocoa nibs over the top.

There is grandeur in this view of life with its several powers having been originally breathed by the creator into a few forms or into one; and that whilst this planet has gone on cycling according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning, endless forms, most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.

People who weigh more aren't lazy 4:29 - The idea of «just eat fewer calories» is akin to telling those with depression to just frown less and smile more 6:45 - How calories can count, we just don't need to count them 7:15 - The «Calorie Myth» 7:29 - Calories in / calories out and why it doesn't work 7:44 - The role of the hypothalamus 10:55 - The four laws of thermodynamics and why it isn't as simple as eating less and burning more 11:31 - Why most interpretations of the laws of thermodynamics are completely wrong 12:31 - the problems with eating less 13:46 - Why you'll lose muscle and fat if you just eat less 14:16 - How calories are different 15:00 - The four factors of quality food: satiety, Agression, Nutrition, Efficiency 15:48 - Foods that the more you eat, the healthier you get 16:05 - Foods to avoid 16:38 - How foods manipulate hormones 17:13 - How to get your brain to tell your body to do something 19:44 - How hormones signal the body to build muscle or gain fat 18:55 - Why exercise alone won't help you lose weight 19:45 - Where «exercise» comes from 21:15 - One step to be healthier

Sisson's approach is commendable in its simplicity — he boils the complexities of diet, exercise, and movement down to a few simple and memorable «laws», based on those instinctively observed by our distant ancestors:

Powerpoint for AQA AS Level Physics Waves topic, covering the theory of refraction, Snell's law with a few worked examples and details of a simple refraction experiment to allow students to investigate refraction.

Instead of a sweeping law to help the afflicted few, how about a simple decision to let those who have «gender identity» issues use separate unisex bathrooms and private changing areas if they are not comfortable using the facilities that comport with the body parts they were born with?

A few weeks ago, just after the new state dog law went into effect, Pennsylvania dog breeder Marcus Lantz made what he said was a simple business decision.

Take a few laws of physics, add a soupcon of well - known and well - validated equations applicable to simple and sometimes theoretical situations; stir in judicious amounts of SWAG (GCMs perhaps being the most egregious example); then have at interpreting mostly manipulated empirical data in light of that.

I think there is an incredible opportunity to develop a system that can capture bibliographic information at the paragraph / section level, but also allow for document storage, annotation and ways to clearly link and show relationships between specified legislation, case law and secondary sources, and all with a few simple clicks of a mouse, of course.

With a few simple shifts in your career or entrepreneurial path, you can start practicing in an area of law that provides meaning, purpose and fulfillment.

Just as the current edition took a major step forward by elimination of the heretofore sacrosanct, but totally useless period, in legal citation, the editors of the Guide to Canadian Legal Research are able to introduce reality into the practice of citing court decisions by a few simple changes to the recommended Hierarchy of Sources for case law.

It is caused by at least three other factors: (i) almost every problem law students encounter in law school comes labelled either by the course or by the assigned moot topic; few students ever have to deal with a simple cry for help from a client; (ii) in my experience at law schools — and it may be different now — almost all research was done in the context of litigation or moots and, while that's obviously an important focus, it's not the only one; and, perhaps the most important factor, (iii) the lawyers who give the students work far too often ask the student to «find a case» — this is almost universal focus of litigators — and are uninterested in either context or principle.

It could be something as simple as process improvement and running your business more, not just more efficiently, not just more streamlined fashion but with fewer errors, the whole lean law thing is basically about that.

Few law firm websites do a good job of answering this simple question.

From the point of view of this class — a class I'll just call «lawyers» — it's too clear for argument that (i) law has things to do so that some instrumentalist theory has to be adopted; (ii) few things are simple, so that no single theory will work in every case, whether it's «wealth maximization», «corrective justice», «contract as promise», compensation or deterrence; and (iii) the demands of practice, the solicitor's need to create relations which will be projected into the (uncertain) future and to control the risks his or her client faces, the barrister's need to conduct litigation at a price the parties can afford and in the context of the adversary system, powerfully limit the consideration that a lawyer can give to theory.

«We believe that there were a few mistakes made, and we want to get clarification, but, ultimately, it comes down to the simple fact that, since our first meeting with the bureau, we made it really clear that we would not be opposed to distribution of any sold information but what we have said is that there are laws and we believe, particularly with consent, that the consumers should have the right to choose,» says DiMichele.

Few big law firms view Legal Zoom as a threat, because its service is simple and that market is less profitable.

Consistent with these earlier reports, the Commission strongly favoured statutory appeals over judicial review as a simpler mechanism for legal oversight that can be calibrated to address the particularities of statutory tribunal decisions, and recommended that legislation contain a right of appeal on questions of law (and in certain instances on questions of fact) to the courts from the exercise of statutory power with only a few exceptions.

Here are two timely pieces: How to Encrypt Data on Your Mac in a Few Simple Steps, from Law Technology Today, and a primer on cyber insurance from the Minnesota State Bar Association.

Here are a few simple things you can do to ensure that you assimilate smoothly into your law firm and have a rewarding summer associate experience:

With clear decisions and executable code for law, parties saw significant risk, high cost, and few benefits in taking simple cases to court.

But at a simpler practical level, it's wrong to assume that the people who come to a firm's website do so only to discover a lawyer or the latest newsletter on securities law; there are those, few though they may be, who actually do want to get in touch with the centre of the firm's intelligence network.

There are a few simple things you can avoid that will save you from repeat D.I.L.Z. (Daughter - in - Law Zings) that we all experience from time to time (some of us more than others!).

If you could get in heaven because of your good deeds, why would JESUS had to have gone to the cross, you will not go to hell because you sinned, the bible says we all have sinned, you will go for rejecting GODS free gift, his son, JESUS, SEE, HE TOOK YOUR PLACE IF YOU EXCEPT HIS OFFER BUT IF NOT YOU PAY FOR ALL YOUR SINS, KIND OF LIKE COURT, BETTER TO TAKE AN ATTORNEY THAN REPRESENT YOURSELF, sorry for caps, GOD loved you so much he sent his son to die for you as payment for sin, you will answer to GOD for everything you do, JESUS lived a perfect life which was accepted by GOD for payment of sins, thats up to you if you except it, is bible vs man made religions, thats alot of commeon since, there are man made laws you go by or suffer for, plus, there are so many religions you can make one up to best suit you, it do nt work that way, plus, excepting JESUS is the best way to heaven, why would you think you caould live perfect your whole life, you cant, the devil will use religion to lead as many people away from CHRIST as he can, even in the garden, eve was decieved.if the bible is not true than no man has anyright to even say whats right or wrong, things some people do they think is fine and so on, is stealing your car wrong, why, who said, and why are they right, think about it, salvation is simple, man makes it hard, other religions say you have to earn it, fine, if they live that good, they should except JESUS, why not except him, my way is through JESUS, if thats wrong, what have i lost, other ways are thru something or anything else, what if they are wrong, high price to pay for opinion, what if your son took someoneles punishment, and it cost him his life, how would you feel, think about GODS feelings, you cant take a few verses from man religion and get anywhere, read the bible, if you believe theres a GOD in heaven, please do nt reject his son, all very good questions, thanks, i do nt want to be a problem, i just want you to be in heaven someday, i cant be good enough to there there on my own, so i looked to the perfect one, JESUS, you do nt worked to get saved, you work because you are savd.you get get back out in sin and backslide, but, if your really saved, the LORD lives inside you, it will bother you to do certain things, but you can get numb to it, plus, the bible says, you are not your own, you were bought with a price, JESUS BLOOD, free to you but cost him his life, GOD will chastise for repeated sin, you are his child, just like with your children, spend some time alone with GOD, ask him to show you, would love to talk to you guys over phone, i cant type, you can tell, theres so much more i can say please call me [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED] or email is [EMAILREMOVED]