Sentences with phrase «few talking points»

From now on, go into your interviews with a tailored resume and a few talking points specifically related to personal experience (from work, academics, or even hobbies) that will allow you to quickly transition into the company and be productive from day one.

Walt was at Code Media this week, so Walt and Nilay go over a few talking points from the conference, including the announcement of the Caavo streaming box — something Nilay is pretty excited about.

May we suggest a few talking points?

It is okay to have a few talking points in mind you want to talk about or ask your date, but it's not okay to sound like you're reading from a script.

The bottom line is that EJ is generally well versed, and if you're going to debate him, you've got to be armed with a bit more than a few talking points with few facts of your own to hit back with.

The Hard Tackle discusses a few talking points to emerge from what was an exciting Manchester United win.

Here is a few talking points which are doing the rounds, and start with the shortest - lived story, and work my way up to what I believe will be the longer saga.

Not exact matches

For example, instead of descriptive bullet points when I'm recommending a particular communications strategy, I'll often show a few screenshots of media coverage that resulted from the strategy, then talk through how we got there.

You read a few interesting messages and are just formulating a response when you suddenly realize that the talk in the meeting has shifted to something you very much need to know about — but you've missed an important point.

Of course, you should come prepared for the meeting with a few thoughts and talking points, but don't get discouraged from sharing your opinion in the future if you're wrong about something.

Having talked about liquidity from the banking system's point of view, I will finish with a few thoughts on liquidity in the superannuation (pension) system.

But Hempton brings up a good point: lots of people talk about it, but very few people actually act this way.

Hal is here talking about the second case, that of what is called «free banking», and is right to point to George Selgin as a leading scholar in this field (here's a podcast I recorded with George a few years ago)-- his books are a must - read if you are serious about money.

Perhaps we were all expecting a few carefully crafted talking points, the typical boring old political speech with stats and taglines designed to humble brag a bit and provide a snippet for the evening news.

If you ask the average Christians how God is most clearly revealed in Jesus Christ, they may talk about His teachings, His miracles, or maybe even His resurrection from the dead, but few would point to the cross.

You might have a point if we are talking dinasaurs, but not in re: to mammals and all other creatures who have lived in the last few million years.

I, admittedly, used to be the type who would buy the off - brand cling wrap because I tend to be unnecessarily frugal at times but, at some point, Thom talked me into spending a few extra bucks on the quality stuff and I haven't reached for the $ 2 roll, since.

Every sport book today is computerized, Back in my day money always moved the line if a player was respected, and if the squares tossed enough money on a game most books would move the line a little, However the big books would just sit and even take layoffs from the small stores, They knew even if the squares got hot in the end the juice would eat em up.Gone are the days when Billy Walters and his crew would move the line 3 and 4 points, I'm talking sides not totals, Forget about what they did to the horseshoe with totals in the NBA, Back then you could catch small non computerized stores with bad lines to begin with, imagine a three point move and the small store or corner bookie is off on the line a few points to begin with, I could catch some game with 6 and seven point advantages, with computers today if you can catch a half or one point advantage your lucky.Even if you know the group moving the line most of these store move the lines on air, when I say air they just watch the screen from D.B. And move the line before they even get hit, Hell even the big stores have the sharps on small limits per call.

It was no surprise to hear Arsene Wenger talking this week about the pressure of being at the top of the Premier League, as his Arsenal side have suffered with it plenty of times, including over the last few weeks when the Gunners hit a slump after finding ourselves two points clear and in pole position to win the Premier League.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If we're third or second with a few games to go and the points total still says it's possible then we can talk about it.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Stop talking about it now coz we need to win at the weekend but rest a few or play best team coz we need the 3 points and play 2nd team next week C1 cup Well done Arsenal

As well as declaring himself pretty underwhelmed by the signing of Moussa Sissoko from Newcastle by our north London rivals Tottenham (Keown thinks it was an unnecessary purchase which the spuds can scarcely afford as they build a new stadium) he spoke about one of the biggest talking points of the last few days, the loan move of Jack Wilshere to AFC Bournemouth for the season.

It certainly doesn't help that with the current manager we seem to have declined to a point (I'm not talking recently because obviously we've had a few good results, but I'm talking over longer periods of time) where we don't seem to have a specific style of play.

The Hard Tackle takes a closer look at few of the significant talking points from Wednesday's EFL Cup fixture.

In the end, we won with the classic two goal margin that we have done the last few weeks but there were a lot of talking points as well.

Talk to other mums in the Community, or help your partner understand about the the first few weeks with a newborn by getting them to read our dad's point of view on this.

My 6 month old has recently started to wake everynight around 1 -30-2.00, i try a few things to settle her before i offer a bottle, But sometimes even after a bottle she is still wide awake and will stay like this for a couple of hours with me literally having to just sit there awake andnleave her in her cot to talk to herself play with her dummy or cry... I am at the breaking point i need sleep... do nt get me wrong this is what being a parent is all about but its a shock to my system after her sleeping throughbfor a couplr of.montjs rarely waking... Need opinions and advice for the in the middle of the night feed, because so many people have told me i shouldnt be giving a bottle and at 6 months shr shouldnt berd a bottle at that time and i should just leave her??? I do nt know what to do... Please help??

We wait until 34 weeks because a baby is still quite small at this point so we want to give the baby enough time before initiating the discussion of interventions, however, it still leaves a few weeks to try and help the baby turn before we start talking about breech birth options.

I just wanted to write this post and talk about some mistakes that I have seen, and also point out a few things you may not know about car seat safety.

In the following few points we talk about the importance of apps for child education.

A few minutes into his talk, as Foshee was pointing out the absurdity of BPI's food safety awards on their website, he dramatically turned to his left to the BPI attorneys and asked if they were there to protect whistleblowers and to support the Food Safety Modernization Act, like the rest of us were?

It was vintage Weiner: steady on his standard talking points, open to questions and giving a few flashes of humor, all while projecting a fairly positive attitude despite the likely election results.

Interestingly, it appears that the government has decided to compromise over the bill with Boris Johnson at one point claiming that the EU could» go whistle» for their money and then, a few weeks later admitting on a radio talk show that Britain may have to pay their fair share.

The SUNY plan remains a sticking point, although there's some early talk that Silver might be willing to give on a few issues.

Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D - Bronx) asked Democrats at one point in the past few weeks to stop bashing the governor during tense budget talks.

Large swaths of the globe were painted red by warmth to the point where it's easier to talk about where the heat wasn't (that would be Antarctica, Scandinavia, East Africa and a few parts of Russia for the record).

We're talking a few percentage points difference.

My wife, Deborah, and I were sitting at a table with Dr. Jonathan Wright and his wife, Holly, and we listened patiently to the talk of the Revolutionary War heroes — a few speakers bedecked in 18th - century military garb — knowing that at some point we would be presented with an award for «Excellence in Integrative Medicine.»

With every purchase we make sure to donate to a charity that works closely with the cause shown in the print, and we also provide each customer with a «Talking Point» — a dinky minizine that gives you a few key facts and a bit more information on the issue at hand.

Women tend to be so down on themselves, always pointing out the few extra pounds they need to lose, or other «flaws,» or talking about the losers they've been dumped by --- all while on a date!

You can show your «smile» by making a joke, using a few smileys and exclamation points (but not too many or you might seem like Barney the Dinosaur) and talking about generally light, fun and uplifting things.

Give your relation some time and talk about your interests, culture, values and try to show a keen interest in her family, values and tradition (you're bound to earn a few brownie points that way).

Avoiding excessive talk of drama (especially for those first few dates) is a great point.

The last few years of moto gp games have not been the best 2015 was ok but not great but this yrs has gotten a bit better but still has alot to do to be as strong as f1 2016 graphics are good the bikes sound great but the lack of commentary during races sort of makes the last corner over take less fun the main selling point of the game is reliveing rossi's career in the challenge mode its fun to see the video of him talking about it before you try recreate it but its easily cleared in less then an hr and theres some great races left off the list overall it has many different modes now the drift and rally are nice the dirt bike section is fun and the career is your character going through the vr46 riding team to moto gp its fun and id advise fans of motogp to buy it

The director hasn't been shy in talking up the new movie, revealing through the press rounds for «Moonrise Kingdom» a few things including: the script is done and it will be Euro based movie; it will reunite him with Owen Wilson (which seems to be a mere formality at this point); and one character will be a personal medium.

You're going to have to wait a few more days to see Your Highness for yourselves, but you should absolutely make a point of seeing the film this weekend: this is a film that demands to be seen with a big, rowdy crowd (and preferably one that's been drinking a bit), and if my suspicions are correct, a whole bunch of people will be talking about the film come Monday morning.

«But I can't believe we won't at least talk about it at some point, once Ryan's had a chance to put down the suit for a few months, and we've had a chance to clear our heads.

Well, Lenny's wife Roxanne (Salma Hayek), who even Lenny admits in the movie's single and genuinely clever joke is too beautiful for him, is over-emotional (the movie's opinion of her) because she wants to have another kid, so it does aim one sexist stereotype at one of its few major female characters (Speaking of sexism, can we talk about the MPAA ratings board's glaring double standard in pointing out that a movie's nudity is of the «male rear» variety, directly implying that there's something different — worse, more offensive — about the same of the female kind?).