Sentences with phrase «few years of data»

Finally, note that the effect of the last few years of data is smaller on the transient climate response than on climate sensitivity.

They could make a much better decision about which teachers to retain for tenure if they had an extra few years of data.

Also, for time series analyse4s, where it would be useful, say, to update a published analysis with the latest few years of data, this is already normally done via a database on on the authors website...

lolwot's summary is fine and accurate in the context of a claim that the last few years of data are evidence that «global warming» has stopped / paused / done something different.

In response to the criticism that teacher impacts on student test scores are inconsistent over time, the authors show that «although VA measures fluctuate across years, they are sufficiently stable» that selecting teachers even based on a few years of data would have substantial impacts on student outcomes, such as earnings.

On the third point, Hess explains that value - added measures of teacher effectiveness are too imprecise and unreliable when just a few years of data are used to judge individual teachers.

We also show that although VA measures fluctuate across years, they are sufficiently stable that selecting teachers even based on a few years of data would have substantial impacts on student outcomes such as earnings.

They simply suggested that in order to calibrate the models, a few years of data need to be collected on the CC tests (PARCC, SBAC).

Again, that's only a hypothesis; it will probably take a few years of data - gathering and - crunching before we know for sure.

A few years of data about a consumers is a better indicator for how they may act in the future than having only a few months of information.

I have to disagree with this, and was trying to point out that even a very short period, a few years of data, would have to be considered meaningful (i.e., not explainable by ENSO) if the temperature anomaly were sufficiently large.

The models and observations both also indicate that the amplitude of interannual variability about these longer - term trends is quite large, making it foolhardy, at best, to try to estimate the slope of anthropogenic warming from a few years of data (as you seem to advocate).

Interannual variability of climate is likely to strongly influence the spatial distribution of CO2 sources and sinks, so that analyses based on a few years of data are insufficient to establish a long - term trend.

Looking at a few years of data or even hundreds of years of data does little in terms of proving «global warming» or «global cooling» for that matter.

But scientists are being cautious about overinterpreting a few years of data.