If we have fewer trials, we will have fewer appeals, and, therefore, we may need
fewer appellate judges.
Not exact matches
The Crown maintains
appellate courts must follow their own precedents and that «subject to a
few exceptions or procedures,
appellate authority binds all
judges and panels of that court».
As such, the qualifications we look for in Supreme Court justices are more likely to be found in inside - the - beltway types,
appellate judges and government attorneys now than they were a
few decades ago.
More
appellate courts, with
fewer judges on each, are better than bulking up the existing courts.
Similarly, the standard does not change as the trial becomes longer and more complex, but the likelihood that the
appellate court will rely on the presumption tends to increase when trial
judges have lived with the controversy for weeks or months, instead of just a
few hours.