This appears to have resulted in more Americans prioritizing environmental protection and
fewer backing nuclear power as an alternative energy source.
Not exact matches
If we choose to reduce our arsenal to what is viewed by many as a credible deterrent, maybe 300, 400 weapons, which is vastly
fewer than 10,000, but would still inflict, you know, horrific damage to anybody foolish enough to challenge us on that front, well then we'll be living in a slightly different world; or we could, as George Shultz, et al argued, «Try to work towards a world free of
nuclear weapons in their entirety and put this destructive genie
back in the bottle.»
Yes, it is common knowledge that Japan restarted a
few of its
nuclear plants, but they have significantly pared
back their
nuclear program and ambitions.
It might help you if you had a
few concepds in mind too when considering this subject, like «space» is the big energy «sink» with old sol (and the internal heat generating processes (including
nuclear) of the earth) as sources... any mechanism that results in a delay of energy leaving earth, such as a «bounce -
back» or a re-rad of energy (like
back radiation) certainly is going to increase the «energy flux» in the system, and this in any way you want to frame the argument translates to a «higher» energy state, and a higher so - called temperature» (movement in matter, velocity of air molecules or oscillations in certain «resonant molecules) as well.