Not exact matches
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or
climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the
impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating
fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports
on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
The findings were not a total surprise, with future projections showing that even with moderate
climate warming, air temperatures over the higher altitudes increase even more than at sea level, and that,
on average,
fewer winter storm systems will
impact the state.
Dr. Martin added: «These are just
few of the human responses to
climate change that, if left unchallenged, may leave us worse off in the future due to their
impacts on nature.
The biggest
impact a U.S. citizen can have
on global environment problems, such as
climate change, is having
fewer children.
Three federal agencies announced the launch Monday of a joint program to predict
climate change and its
impacts on local scales over a
few decades, information that decision makers will need to adapt to the inevitable.
But most models have focused
on short - term timescales, decades or a
few centuries at most, says Anders Levermann, a
climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and co-author of the new
climate scientist at the Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research in Germany and co-author of the new
Climate Impact Research in Germany and co-author of the new paper.
Such findings indicate that
few places
on Earth will be immune to global warming and that the tropics will likely experience associated
climate impacts, such as increased tropical storm intensity.»
A new study by statistics professors at Oregon State University finds that the biggest
impact a U.S. citizen can have
on this
climate change problem is perhaps not so much surprising as difficult to accept: have
fewer children.
While significant research has explored the environmental
impacts of
climate change, far
fewer studies have considered its psychological effect
on humans, said UA researcher Sabrina Helm, an associate professor of family and consumer science in the UA's Norton School of Family and Consumer Sciences in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
As the world has warmed over the past
few decades,
climate scientists have increasingly sounded the alarm over the potentially catastrophic
impacts that warming could have
on the world's weather.
Sure, there might be a
few papers that take
climate sensitivity as a given and somehow try to draw conclusions about the
impact on the
climate from that... But, I hardly think that these are swamping the number of papers trying to determine what the
climate sensitivity is, studying if the water vapor feedback is working as expected, etc., etc..
«We know that many billions are required over the next
few years to fill the gap in
climate finance, but the money pledged today is vital to help some of the most vulnerable people
on the planet cope with the immediate
impacts of our rapidly warming world,» Ishii continued.
This paper will get a lot of attention, because it follows by a
few months a paper from last summer, Whiteman et al (2013), which claimed a strong (and expensive) potential
impact from Arctic methane
on near - term
climate evolution.
One could argue —
on some people do — that, from the perspective of global resource consumption, a world with
fewer individuals living in highly developed countries — ie, the places where per capital resource consumption is highest — would be desirable in order reduce the
climate impact and resource consumption of the human population.
Either Outcome A; our exponentially growing rate of technological change will quickly lead us to exert such devastating
impact on our planet that we'll be extinct within a
few generations (apologies to the guy who thought his kids would live 10,000 years), or Outcome B; our exponentially growing rate of technological change will quickly lead us to effective measures to control the global
climate.
Compare the SST before and after along the coastline [1 - 3 °C cooling]... some of this is the freshwater run - off from Mississippi River which will increase over the next
few days... thus, we see the footprint of the «land - phoon»
on the Gulf of Mexico and its
climate impacts.
This report, «
Climate Stabilization Targets: Emissions, Concentrations, and
Impacts Over Decades to Millennia,» provides a fresh degree - by - degree guide to impacts on river flows, rainfall, coasts and other factors that matter enormously over the next few decades as human populations
Impacts Over Decades to Millennia,» provides a fresh degree - by - degree guide to
impacts on river flows, rainfall, coasts and other factors that matter enormously over the next few decades as human populations
impacts on river flows, rainfall, coasts and other factors that matter enormously over the next
few decades as human populations crest.
There are far
fewer assessments of possible
climate - change
impacts on tropical regions outside Amazonia.
A
few degrees of global warming has a huge
impact on ice sheets, sea levels and other aspects of
climate.
Hurricanes are likely to become
fewer in number, but fiercer in nature according to two recent studies assessing the
impact of
climate change
on hurricane formation.
During the 1970s, only a
few people speculated that it might be wise to impose serious changes
on industry and agriculture for the special purpose of reducing their
impact on climate.
Those are the kind of results the UN
climate negotiators see as the future of farming — growing more food with
fewer impacts on the land and
climate.
Here are just a
few... British Antarctic Survey (BAS) Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Department of Energy and
Climate Change (DECC) Energy Saving Trust (EST) Environmental Change Institute (ECI) European Space Agency (ESA) The Geological Society (GS) Grantham Institute for
Climate Change (GICC) Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) Met Office (MO) National Academy of Sciences (NAS) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Oceanography Centre (NOC) The Royal Society (RS) Tyndall Centre for
Climate Change Research (TCCCR) UK
Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP) United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change (UNFCCC) World
Climate Research Programme (WCRP) World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
But even with these measures,
few organizations will have addressed their entire
impact on the
climate — especially those in the value chain, for which they are not directly responsible.
Air pollution, ozone depletion, acid precipitation, global warming, desertification, smog production, and deforestation are but a
few of the human
impacts on the
climate system that arise from the alteration of the mass and energy exchange with the atmosphere.
A recent study from the Swedish Ministry of Sustainable Development argues that males have a disproportionately larger
impact on global warming («women cause considerably
fewer carbon dioxide emissions than men and thus considerably less
climate change»).
The relative magnitudes of the
climate impacts induced by the naturally - occurring NAO and by anthropogenic factors will depend
on the time horizon (e.g., next
few decades vs. end of the twenty - first century), time - scale (interannual vs. multi-decadal), and parameter (temperature vs. precipitation) of interest (e.g., Deser et al. 2012).
Heavy snowstorms are not inconsistent with a warming planet... In fact, as the Earth gets warmer and more moisture gets absorbed into the atmosphere, we are steadily loading the dice in favor of more extreme storms in all seasons, capable of causing greater
impacts on society... If the
climate continues to warm, we should expect an increase in heavy snow events for a
few decades, until the
climate grows so warm that we pass the point where it's too warm for it to snow heavily.
Today, many fossil fuel companies already acknowledge that action
on climate change presents a material risk, but
few offer disclosures that adequately assess the financial
impact.
However,
on a time scale of a
few years to a
few decades ahead, future regional changes in weather patterns and
climate, and the corresponding
impacts, will also be strongly influenced by natural unforced
climate variations.
Today I sat in
on one of the
few (if not only) COP22 side events
on the
impacts of animal agriculture in driving
climate change.
«Today, we have to assume that the risks of negative
impacts of
climate change on humans and nature are larger than just a few years ago,» says Hans - Martin Füssel from the Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Researc
climate change
on humans and nature are larger than just a
few years ago,» says Hans - Martin Füssel from the Potsdam Institute of
Climate Impact Researc
Climate Impact Research (PIK)
Today, we have to assume that the risks of negative
impacts of
climate change
on humans and nature are larger than just a
few years ago
The abrupt
impact of
climate change
on causing extinctions of key concern, therefore, is its potential to deplete population sizes below viable thresholds within just the next
few decades, whether or not the last individual of a species actually dies.
It presently is not possible to place exact probabilities
on the added contribution of
climate change to extinction, but the observations noted above indicate substantial risk that
impacts from
climate change could, within just a
few decades, drop the populations in many species below sustainable levels, which in turn would commit the species to extinction.
This long - term perspective illustrates that policy decisions made in the next
few years to decades will have profound
impacts on global
climate, ecosystems and human societies — not just for this century, but for the next ten millennia and beyond.
«Because our understanding of
climate change and the
impacts on the world around us has advanced significantly in the last
few years, it was vitally important that the AGU update its Statement.»
Attempts to significantly influence
climate impacts based
on just controlling CO2 and a
few other greenhouse gases emissions is an inadequate and incomplete policy for this purpose.The goal should be to seek politically and technologically practical ways (with minimal cost and maximum benefit) to reduce the vulnerability of the environment and society to the entire spectrum of human - caused and natural risks including those from
climate, but also from all other environmental and social threats.
Hydropower has some well - known environmental
impacts, especially
on rivers and aquatic ecosystems, but it produces
few or no air contaminants, whereas burning natural gas emits many pollutants, including
climate - changing greenhouse gases.
Because our understanding of
climate change and its
impacts on the world around us has advanced so significantly in the last
few years
Imagine then the
impact of discovering a
few years later (via
Climate Audit and Bishop Hill) that the hockey stick graph was methodologically flawed and based
on poor data.
Both these countries experienced an upsurge in extreme
climate events in the past
few years, and one would think that would have serious
impact on peoples» attitudes.
Nevertheless, as I have said, the
impact of the reductions in Arctic sea ice extent, which we have seen in the last
few years
on our winter
climate, is only one of a number of factors, and certainly last year was probably not the dominant factor.
On the other hand, if abrupt climate changes don't happen on their own — if they only happen due to extraterrestrial causes — then one would want to see evidence of impacts for at least a few more of them, not just on
On the other hand, if abrupt
climate changes don't happen
on their own — if they only happen due to extraterrestrial causes — then one would want to see evidence of impacts for at least a few more of them, not just on
on their own — if they only happen due to extraterrestrial causes — then one would want to see evidence of
impacts for at least a
few more of them, not just one.
For many years important events in human evolution have been attributed to
climate change and as part of a recent study, scientists have been considering the precise
impact that
climate change has had
on human evolution during the last
few hundred thousand years.
All of the ocean oscillations (ENSO, AMO, PDO, etc) have a big
impact on climate over timescales that range from a year to a
few decades.