Velocity - specificity probably happens for many reasons, including greater increases in single
fiber contractile velocity (including fiber type shifts), greater increases in early phase neural drive, more suppressed co-activation, and bigger improvements in co-ordination, compared to low - velocity (heavy load) training.
Single muscle
fiber contractile properties during a competitive season in male runners.
Peripheral factors include muscle size, moment arm length, the length of the fascicles, the prevailing pennation angle of the fibers, the muscle fiber type, and even the single
fiber contractile properties.
A very important point about muscle
fiber contractile properties is that there is a strong inverse relationship between a muscle's strength and its endurance.
Not exact matches
Strength training has an undisputable good record for providing benefits such as increased muscle
fiber size, increased muscle
contractile strength, increased tendon strength and increased ligament strength, in people who train consistently (more than twice per week) for 12 weeks.
Almost 80 % of the muscle
fiber's density is comprised of these
contractile parts, which leaves a great potential for muscle size growth.
Hypertrophy is an increase in the different size dimension of muscular
fibers, whether in terms of size increases in the
contractile or non-
contractile fibers of muscle tissue.
Trauma = Microtrauma, focusing primarily on type II
fibers here - how much actual structural damage this workout is doing to your
contractile tissue.
it also seems that for me, more high weight low rep training would be preferential as it produces more
contractile based muscle
fibers or myofibriol and would increase strength moreso then size.
Thus, the affected muscle
fibers strengthen their lateral connections to the ECM by forming new costameres (e.g. integrins) either side of the damaged area, and this enables
contractile force to be transmitted despite the injury.
But the broad range of
contractile properties across all muscle
fibers means that
fibers of the same type do not all have the same level of strength, endurance, or speed.
This suggests that one way in which velocity - focused training produces velocity - specificity is by altering
contractile components of the individual muscle
fibers.
They designed a study «to compare the adaptive changes in muscle size,
contractile strength, and MHC (
fiber type) composition evoked by resistance training performed at either low or high contraction intensity (i.e. low or high reps) while equalized for total loading volume»
The above description of the
contractile properties of each muscle
fiber type might lead you to believe that each type of
fiber has distinct
contractile properties.
The
contractile properties discussed earlier tell us what the average
contractile properties are for each type of muscle
fiber.
This damage consists of microscopic tears in the muscle
fibers that make up the muscle and may involve injury to the
contractile elements within the muscle
fiber as well as the surrounding tissue, the connective tissue that surrounds each muscle
fiber.
All muscles contract using the same basic principles - ion transport powers the attachment, configuration change, and detachment of protein cross bridges in a given muscle
fiber, which causes
contractile proteins to slide across each other and, well, contract.
This indicates that there are other features of muscle
fibers that determine
contractile velocity.
The greater gains in strength - to - size that result from an increase in specific tension are not reflected in improvements in muscle power, because the reduction in
contractile velocity counteracts the effects of the increased muscle
fiber force (Erskine et al. 2011).
This reduces the effective
contractile length of muscle
fibers, reducing the shortening velocity, and increasing force production (Erskine et al. 2011).
Since the upper region appears to display slower
contractile characteristics, it may have a greater proportion of type I muscle
fibers.
Since the middle and lower regions display faster
contractile characteristics, they may be comprised of a greater proportion of type II muscle
fibers.
Although MMG is still in its infancy in comparison with EMG, there are indications that it can be used to assess differences in a range of parameters, including muscle
fiber type, muscle force, peripheral fatigue, and
contractile properties (see review by Ibitoye et al. 2014).