Not exact matches
This means that such
fights, which are at the core of the delays
over energy legislation, are a distraction from the simpler process of building the first stages of a sustained energy quest after a long comfortable nap facilitated by cheap abundant
fossil fuels for which longer - term and indirect costs are finally being gauged.
It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence» in the
fight over climate science and policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage in money and influence held by industries dealing in, or dependent on,
fossil fuels.
But this wouldn't preclude the inevitable
fight over the costs and benefits of continued reliance on
fossil fuels.
Activists are also
fighting Rover and other
fossil fuel infrastructure projects on climate change grounds because the new installations can have a lifespan of 50 years or more, locking in new carbon emissions
over the long term.
It can be added that CO2 impacts are only part of the troubles and impacts created by the
fighting over the right to benefit most from burning
fossil fuels.
The
fight over clean energy and climate policy in California is dripping with out - of - state oil money because the oil billionaires want to stamp out the progress that has been made to move toward clean energy and energy efficiency, and keep us addicted to their
fossil fuels.
In 2017 alone, we've held
over 900 local anti-fracking meetings and trained
over 100 organizations in the country on how to
fight fossil fuels.
Hundreds of thousands of people joined an estimated 2,300 marches and actions in 175 countries
over the weekend, demanding that the heads of state and negotiators in Paris pull together a strong deal to
fight global warming — and
fight to keep
fossil fuels in the ground and shift to 100 percent clean energy.
The entire developed world is implicated by its dependence upon
fossil fuels to function yet some have
over the past few decades struggled valiantly to change this while others have
fought to keep the status quo.
The owners of those
fossil fuels have now begun
fighting over who gets to sell their
fossil carbon, and who doesn't.
'' [I] t is hard to deny that the
fossil fuel industry has been fiercely
fighting effective climate policies
over the past couple of decades.
We can't all become survivalists; surviving into the next century (moot for me as a septuagenerian) will likely call on all our cooperative skills, or else what we are likely to get in a world
fighting over scarce food and water, never mind
fossil fuels, is neofeudalism.
That will put Gina McCarthy, the woman he's tapped to run the agency, at the heart of a
fight over a priority that Obama views as a cornerstone of his legacy — and that the
fossil -
fuel industry views as a threat to its very existence.
To many, the thought of people in a town of just
over 82,000 — in a county of only 200,000 — taking on the
fossil fuel industry in a local
fight with global implications might sound a little, well, ambitious.
As with
fights under way
over the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, and plans to build coal export terminals on U.S. coastlines, the new
fossil fuel abundance is touching off a backlash among those alarmed by the consequences for climate change.