Sentences with phrase «figure above»

As the figure above illustrates, home mortgages represent the largest share of total household loans.

The figure above plots the real return on the 10 - Year Treasury Note (the left axis) with the natural log of Fed holdings of longer - dated US Treasury securities, those maturing in 5 years or more.

Shown in the figure above, although refinancing applications fell significantly in response to higher rates in late 2016, and have declined over the September 2017 to January 2018 mortgage rate increase period, the decline in February was smaller compared to the extent of the rate increase in the same month and mostly offset the modest increase in January.

A recent report from Child Trends found that the odds that children in Sweden were held back in school were 78 percent higher for children from single - parent families, compared to their peers from two - parent families, as the figure above indicates.

However, as you can see from the figure above, the story does not stop with a simple cryptocurrency wallet.

Feature # 506 noted in the bottom right figure above presents a special «stop mechanism» that prevents the base from sliding when the user is positioning the display from an upright position to an artist's tablet slanted down when working with a Surface Pen as noted in the top patent figure.

These results are in line with the more precise studies in the figure above.)

Rates to cover manufacturing jobs can be significantly higher or lower that the figure above, depending on the types of products your company produces and the injury risks your employees face while making them.

However, the previous solvency ratio was also a substantial figure above the solvency ratio demanded by the Indian regulations, which is 150 %.

However, look at the figure above.

Pablo, Taking into account your 50 % figure above, and the relative area of the oceans (71 %), «back of the envelope» calculations suggest that the oceans receive about 37 terrawatts of internal heat.

The importance of such thaw - discontinuities can not be underplayed in a model of catastrophic devolatilisation (Shakhova, 2014), as illustrated by Mars where violent degassing equivalent to 20 Yamal explosions per km ² occurs through sub-mound palaeo - taliks alone (e.g., Figure above).

He compares (see figure above) something called the «Gore curve» with something called the «true curve» (la courbe veritable).

In our case, the water is flowing into the tub faster than it's draining out - the shallow oceans are warming fast, as the figure above illustrates.

As an aside, since that study almost certainly underestimated the rate of sea ice loss — for instance, it ignores black carbon, a major source of ice loss — I tend to think that the actual summer ice loss will be somewhere between what that study projected and the oversimplified quadratic projections in the figure above.

The jurors said he is renown for his «visionary business strategy and high degree of environmental awareness,» stating he is «an outstanding figure above all because of his contributions to environmental protection.»

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/04/13/3426117/climate-panel-avoiding-catastrophe-cheap/ «Now you might think it would be a no - brainer that humanity would be willing to pay a very high cost to avoid such catastrophes and achieve the low emission «2 °C» (3.6 °F) pathway in the left figure above (RCP2.6 — which is a total greenhouse gas level in 2100 equivalent to roughly 450 parts per million of CO2).

One thought — the figure above works for me and is of a kind often used, but it took me a while to figure out because it's a graphical presentation of data, not a picture.

5.6 Million Urban Shade Trees Killed in Texas The effects of the driest year on record for Texas are still being tabulated, with the latest info being this figure above, representing 10 % of the state's urban forests and is in addition to the 500 million trees killed by drought as reported in December.

Looking back at the figure above, both approaches are based on assuming that aerosol forcing is at the edge of the probability spectrum (as if it were some fudge factor), whereas the most likely value is somewhere in the mid range.

To proceed I have adopted a strategy based on the 60 - year cycle, which has been estimate to have amplitude of about 0.3 °C, as the first figure above shows.

Getting back to the main point of the paper, it should be obvious from the figure above that the first equation is not a good approximation of the second, because the entrainment term is not a major player and it certainly is not acting to balance the buoyancy acceleration.

However, for such an ambitious target as 1.5 C, 0.3 C can make a substantial difference when calculating how much remaining CO2 we can still emit without pushing us over 1.5 C of warming when the remaining budget is calculated by simply subtracting off estimates of cumulative emissions to date from the ESM - based budgets for 1.5 C relative to preindustrial (i.e. the horizontal difference between the cross and the vertical dashed black line in the figure above).

The figure above is after a figure from Maus et al 2010 «Long term solar activity influences on South American rivers».

We can see this in the figure above, where the spikes during the El Niño events (particularly the 1997/1998 event) are much larger than in the surface data.

Land - only lower tropospheric temperature data from the three groups, UAH, RSS, NOAA STAR are shown in the figure above.

As the first figure above shows, the IPCC estimates the temperature influence of internal variability since 1950 at ± 0.1 °C, during which time we've seen about 0.65 °C global surface warming.

The figure above compares the average track forecast errors in the Atlantic Ocean basin during the past six hurricane seasons for the most reliable computer models available to the National Hurricane Center during this period.

The figure above compares the three major global surface temperature records to 105 unique runs involving 42 different GCMs used in the upcoming IPCC report.

The figure above is from the fact sheet.

This is illustrated in the figure above for two periods in a single model run.

The figure above compares some of the Earth's stored energy resources.

The figure above shows all 105 model runs, and reveals significant differentiation among the models.

So how does your hypothesis explain that from Jose cycle 31 to 42, a period of over 2000 years between 2800 BP and 5000 BP, essentially no grand solar minima took place, as the figure above from McCracken shows?

In the figure above, note the vertical sections of (A) temperature, (B) aragonite saturation, (C) pH, (D) DIC, and (E) pCO2 on transect line 5 off Pt.

It goes from 1C to 10 C. See IPCC figure The above huge error bars are not exactly what is called a «small» error.

The Addendum Figure above shows the distribution of June 2014 Outlook contributions as a series of box plots, broken down by general type of method.

That is approximately a 93 percent reduction from the Business as Usual case, the 1200 figure above.

The blue line plots the mean carbon budget (across the 1000 samples) as a function of the uncertainty surrounding climate sensitivity (for this demonstration, climate sensitivity is expressed in units of KW - 1 m2, with a mean of.741 and variance as shown in the figure above.

For the reconstruction discussed in the emails (based on tree ring width in Briffa et al 1999) was superceded by a subsequent study (Briffa 2000, based on tree - ring density) as seen in the final figure above.

In the figure above, you'll notice that the CCC model that Boer is focusing on has the weakest response of precipitation compared to the other models.

2nd, let's restrict the discussion to the GISS data set, as shown in the 1st figure above, and even more restrictive, constrain the analysis to just the two middle legs (as these are two interior legs that «may» look somewhat similar to what some are calling the current SAT hiatus):

This could then be plotted for all n somewhat similar to the 2nd figure above (but with 31 curves for the 31 n values).

David Rose's article also includes the figure above which purports to show that the NOAA data was adjusted to show higher temperatures.

This study from which the figure above is taken (Swanson et al, 2009, Has the climate recently shifted?)

The figure above shows the old ERSST 3, the new version 4, and HadSST side by side.

For example, the figure above shows how aggressive climate - friendly policies in the IEA's ambitious «450 Scenario» (a 2 degree - focussed scenario) could provoke increases in deployment of renewable energy and efficiencies, as well as a relatively big contribution from CCS by 2035.

Figure above: Global maps which show the cooling (purples - blues - green) and warming (yellow - orange - red) tendencies for the present (top row), for the A1B projection in the year 2050 (second row), and for B1 in 2050 (third row).

Whilst you're at it perhaps you could explain the theory behind all the red and yellow areas on the Pacific side of the Arctic in the Yeager et al. figure above?

For example (see figure above), let's say the average monthly max.