Sentences with phrase «figures mean response»

Not exact matches

@right4life: your response basically means «YUK YUK I CA N'T FIGURE IT OUT, SO, IT»S TOTALLY OUT OF OUR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND.»

In total, we were able to extract mean differences in total cholesterol between those breastfed and formula - fed from all 17 eligible studies (representing 17 498 subjects); of these differences, 13 were based on the response of individual authors (11 703 subjects), whereas 4 were obtained from the published literature (Figure 1 and Table 1 for both).

In the figure below, you can see that, here again, more soya protein meant more anabolic response.

Figure 1: Response to the survey question «Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?»

We received 21 Pan-Arctic responses for the September 2013 Arctic mean sea ice extent with a median value of 4.0 million square kilometers and the quartile values are 3.8 and 4.6 million square kilometers (Figure 1).

That means a model with high - end GHG response (about 1.3 ºC according to Figure 10.5) is also likely to have a high - end OA response (about -0.6 ºC).

Shown are the simulated, multi-model mean responses to (i) the A2 emissions scenario and (ii) an extended B1 scenario, where radiative forcing beyond the year 2100 was kept constant to the 2100 value (all data from Meehl et al., 2007, Figure 10.4, see also Meehl et al., 2007, Section 10.7).

We received 21 responses with a range of estimates from 4.0 to 5.0 million square kilometers for the September 2012 arctic mean sea ice extent (Figure 1).

The same model generating the global mean temperature in this figure is also used to simulate the response of tropospheric winds to the Antarctic stratospheric ozone hole, for example.

Simulations with a simple climate model (Schimel et al., 1997) indicate that the global mean temperature response in these profiles is likely to differ by no more than about 0.2 °C from the equivalent WRE profiles (Wigley et al., 1996; see Figure 9.16), though the maximum rate of temperature change is likely to be lower with the S profiles.

We received 21 responses for the Pan-Arctic report (Figure 1), with estimates in the range of just below 4.0 million square kilometers to as high as 5.4 million square kilometers for the September arctic mean sea ice extent.

Figure 3 illustrates the observed mean responses and model fits for the IMM and WLC groups using the treatment completer sample.

Figure 2 illustrates the observed mean responses and LME model fits for the IMM and WLC groups using the ITT sample.