FERC ruled that the state acted in a reasonable time, and a second application was
filed by Constitution less than a year after one dating from May 2014.
On May 22, U.S. District Court Judge William K. Watkins, Jr., whose court is in Montgomery, Alabama, cancelled the May 24 hearing in Stein v Chapman, the ballot access lawsuit
filed by the Constitution, Green and Libertarian Parties.
Not exact matches
The suits
by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign,
filed in federal courts in Baltimore and Seattle, claim Trump's plan violates the Equal Protection clause of the
Constitution.
Texas Representative Matt Schaefer
filed House Joint Resolution 89 that proposes to amend the Texas
constitution by establishing virtual currency rights and limiting subsequent efforts to regulate digital currency.
Detroit school students, represented
by the Los Angeles - based public interest firm Public Counsel,
filed suit last month against the state of Michigan, claiming a legal right to literacy based on the 14th Amendment to the
Constitution.
The writ petition
filed by Kali Digital claims that the decision of the Reserve Bank to deny services to crypto traders and exchanges violates various acts of the Indian
constitution - Article 19 (1)(g) and Article 14 - which promise individuals a fair treatment among the eyes of law, as well as the freedom to practice any business or occupation of their choice.
Twenty - one years after the RFRA was introduced in the House of Representatives
by Chuck Schumer, passed nearly unanimously
by Congress, and signed into law
by President Bill Clinton, the Freedom From Religion Foundation has
filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to strike it down as an unconstitutional «takeover of the Court's power to interpret the
Constitution» and a violation of the Establishment Clause.
The plaintiff is seeking: A declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of the provisions of the 1992
Constitution, particularly Articles 88 (5), 218 (a) and (e), 284 and 287 thereof, the 1st defendant can not act as the legal representative for Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta, the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Ghana, in a pending investigation bordering on conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response
filed by the 1st Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whatsoever;
«Because the
Constitution provides the authority for the allocation of monies for particular and additional services, appertaining to or entailed
by that special capacity, the documents
filed with the Comptroller can not be false and therefore the instruments
filed were not false filings under Penal Law,» the memo states.
The Knoxville News Sentinel has this story on the new ballot access lawsuit
filed two weeks ago
by the
Constitution and Green Parties.
In his suit marked FHC / ABJ / CS / 508/2017 and
filed on June 28, Dawodu urged the court to declare Saraki as empowered
by the Nigerian
Constitution to set up a medical panel to determine Buhari's health status «without first being a resolution of the Executive Council of the Federation.»
According to Article IV of the California
Constitution, the candidate must be a United States Citizen, a resident of California for three years, a resident of the legislative district for one year and a registered voter in that district
by the time nomination papers are
filed.
To fight what it called a «grave threat» to the country, a watchdog group
filed a lawsuit alleging that Trump is violating the U.S.
Constitution by allowing his business to accept payments from foreign governments.
His lawyer, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN), who
filed the suit on behalf of the former governor on Tuesday, argued that his client's rights allegedly violated
by the three respondents were guaranteed
by sections 35 (1), 34 (1), 35 (4), 41 (1) of the Nigerian
Constitution.
According to the Court of Appeal, Metuh and his company failed to first obtain the leave of either the trial court or the appellate court before
filing a notice of appeal as required
by the
constitution when
filing an appeal against an interlocutory decision, on the grounds of mixed law and facts.
This week, supporters of Blake's main rival, Marsha Michael, a court attorney favored
by the Bronx Democratic County Committee,
filed specific objections seeking to invalidate his petition signatures and disqualifying him because he doesn't meet state
constitution's residency requirements.
Other suits
filed by Posner on the budget that year, dismissed on the basis of his lacking standing, generically stated that Posner argued the budget violated Article VII of the
Constitution.
A bill that would be the first step toward changing the
constitution passed the Senate but stalled in the Assembly amid concerns
by public employee unions that it would capture rank - and -
file state workers — not just corrupt politicians.
On December 8, 2011, opponents
filed suit, alleging that the newly drawn state House map violated the Voting Rights Act and the equal protection clause of the United States
Constitution by «targeting African - American incumbents for pairing, and «cracking» the Latino community of southwest Detroit.»
The plaintiffs had
filed the substantive suit on July 4, 2016, contending that that
by virtue of the PDP's
Constitution, they must remain in office till 2018.
The Supreme Court [today], Wednesday, dismissed an application
filed by journalist Richard Dela Sky, which asked the court to interpret provisions of the 1992
Constitution on the appointment of an Electoral Commission Chair.
This is the ballot access case
filed by the Green Party and the
Constitution Party in July 2011.
This is the case
filed by the Green Party and the
Constitution Party, challenging the May petition deadline for newly - qualifying parties.
A bill that requires Tennessee's public schools to set aside one minute at the beginning of the school day for «meditation, or prayer, or personal beliefs» has been signed into law
by Gov. Lamar Alexander, but the American Civil Liberties Union (aclu) of Tennessee intends to
file suit shortly on the grounds that the law is in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution.
The longest - running of the cases,
filed in federal court in 2000, alleged that Arizona's individual tax - credit program violates the establishment clause of the U.S.
Constitution by permitting organizations to provide scholarships to students that can be used only at religious schools.
The lawsuit,
filed by the nonprofit Public Interest Law Office of Rochester in September 1998, claims that the state has deprived the plaintiffs — all low - income black and Hispanic students — of their rights under the state
constitution to a sound basic education
by failing to alleviate concentrations of poverty in the 37,000 - student Rochester school district.
The Minnesota Federation of Teachers has
filed suit in federal district court in St. Paul to block the state's 1985 Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act on the grounds that the law violates both the state and federal
constitutions by permitting the «direct diversion» of public funds from public schools to church - related colleges and universities.
And we'll also keep you posted on the lawsuit
filed by public school teachers who allege that the repeal of career status violates state and federal
constitutions by denying teachers due process rights.
A judge has rejected a lawsuit
filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center claiming that Mississippi's charter school law violates the state's
constitution.
The Niehaus lawsuit,
filed by the Arizona School Boards Association and the Arizona Education Association, claims that the Empowerment Account program violates the religion clauses of the Arizona
Constitution.
In September 2010, the ACLU
filed suit on behalf of students alleging the fees violated the California
constitution's free public education guarantee and discriminated against lower - income students
by creating a «pay - to - learn» system that threatened the integrity of the free public education system.
Except as expressly provided herein, any claim, dispute or controversy (whether based upon contract; tort, intentional or otherwise;
constitution; statute; common law; or equity and whether pre-existing, present or future), including initial claims, counter-claims, cross-claims and thirdparty claims, arising from or relating to (i) the Card; (ii) any service relating to the Card; (iii) the marketing of the Card; (iv) this Cardholder Agreement, including the validity, enforceability, interpretation, scope, or application of the Agreement and this arbitration provision (except for the prohibition on class or other non-individual claims, which shall be for a court to decide); and (v) any other agreement or instrument relating to the Card or any such service («Claim») shall be decided, upon the election of you or the Bank (or Green Dot Corporation or the Bank's agents, employees, successors, representatives, affiliated companies, or assigns),
by binding arbitration pursuant to this arbitration provision and the applicable rules and procedures of the arbitration administrator in effect at the time the Claim is
filed.
The collections varyingly consist of meeting minutes,
constitutions,
by - laws, officer lists and
files, original research on breeds, correspondence, brochures, pamphlets, premium lists, show catalogs, club publications, photographs, audio - visual material, and more.
A Georgia state trial court has denied a motion to dismiss
filed by Reed Elsevier, the parent company of LexisNexis, in a class action accusing the company — and Fulton County — of violating the state
constitution by requiring court documents to be electronically
filed at litigants» expense.
On Tuesday May 27, 2014, it was reported in the media that a motion raising a question of public interest was
filed in Quebec Superior Court
by a medical doctor Paul Saba, and a woman with cerebral palsy Lisa D'Amico, claiming that Bill 52 is illegal and violates both the Quebec and Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Quebec's Civil Code, the Quebec Code of medical practice, medical ethics, the Criminal Code and the
Constitution.
It is also noteworthy because the court recognized that the right to copyright is a human right protected
by the
Constitution of Ireland, 1937; and that the graduated response protocol was fully justified in light of the importance of copyright and the adverse effects of unauthorized online
file sharing.
By Notice of a Constitutional Matter
filed herewith, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission («the Commission») has given notice that the above proceedings potentially involve a matter arising under the
Constitution or involving its interpretation within the meaning of section 78B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).