Sentences with phrase «filibuster rules»
"Filibuster rules" refers to the regulations or procedures that allow politicians to engage in extended or prolonged speeches in order to delay or block the passage of a proposed law or bill in government discussions. These rules grant individuals the ability to use lengthy speeches as a tactic to obstruct or stall the legislative process. Full definition
So long as the Republicans hold fewer than 60 Senate seats, and the current filibuster rules remain in place, the majority party will need Democratic votes to close discussion on any policy matter.
observer.com
Update: At «The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times,» Todd Ruger has a post titled «Suit Challenging Senate Filibuster Rule Fails in D.C. Circuit.»
He said Senate Democrats poisoned the well when they changed filibuster rules unilaterally to confirm lower court nominees — and he said that election - year politics make it virtually impossible to find a pick everyone will be happy with.
Unfortunately, it seems the most recent edition is from 1992, and therefore it would not contain, for example, the new filibuster rules.
For example, they changed the judicial filibuster rule as laid out in this answer - but since they never officially changed the rules with a 2/3 majority as required, the «rule» they are now using isn't listed in those official rules.
(CNN)- Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh used an analogy about rape Friday to blast this week's decision by the Senate's Democratic majority to change the chamber's filibuster rules despite the unanimous opposition of minority Republicans.
In her recent piece, Fillibuster, 2016 she re-enacted Senator Wendy Davis» 11 Hour filibuster against Texas abortion laws in June 2013 adhering to the Texas filibuster rules which prohibited sitting, leaning, drinking, eating, or restroom breaks.
Under current filibuster rules, 60 votes are needed to close discussion of most matters.
Notwithstanding the fact that a complete repeal is unlikely due to Senate filibuster rules that would require 60 Senate votes to pass, Republicans could use the budget reconciliation process to immediately remove key revenue provisions of the law, including Medicaid expansion funding, the unpopular Cadillac tax on high - cost coverage, and the penalties for either not having or not offering health insurance, known as the individual and employer mandates, respectively.
There was an order in there titled «To provide for expedited Senate consideration of certain nominations subject to advice and consent», but this did not appear to be the new filibuster rule.
«And I think he has to get rid of the filibuster rule,» Trump said.
Instead of changing the debate (the role that originally brought him to prominence), he has been trying to craft legislation that can pass the Senate while avoiding the filibuster rule.
Moreover, when the Senate changed its filibuster rules in 2013, so that judicial nominees were exempt, the change did not extend to Supreme Court nominees.
In recent years, the Senate has operated under a filibuster rule that 60 votes are needed to end debate and bring an issue to a vote.
The future makeup of the court depends upon imponderables like the outcome of presidential elections and the makeup of the Senate (and its filibuster rules, as we saw last week).
At least 10 Senate Democrats oppose or are leaning against a proposal to overhaul the filibuster rule by lowering the number to end debate.
In July 2013, the nuclear option was raised as nominations were being blocked by Senate Republicans as Senate Democrats prepared to push through a change to the chamber's filibuster rule.
«If Republican Senate doesn't get rid of the Filibuster Rule & go to a simple majority, which the Dems would do, they are just wasting time!»
[8][9][10] The metaphor of a nuclear strike refers to the majority party unilaterally imposing a change to the filibuster rule, which might provoke retaliation by the minority party.
«If Republican Senate doesn't get rid of the Filibuster Rule & go to a simple majority, which the Dems would do, they are just wasting time,» Trump tweeted Wednesday morning.
The U.S. Senate was expected to take up the $ 51 billion federal Sandy recovery package today but ended up putting it off at least for a day while Senate leaders negotiate over changes in filibuster rules.
But current filibuster rules, which Republicans appear loathe to change, require 60 votes to close discussion on any piece of legislation — meaning the GOP majority will depend on the backing of at least eight Democrats to advance their agenda.