Sentences with phrase «filibusters for»

Washington (CNN)- In a rare, private meeting with nearly all 100 senators Monday night, the upper chamber failed to come up with a deal to avert the so - called nuclear option — a partisan threat by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that would eliminate filibusters for executive - branch nominees.

If the GOP / Teatrolls want to agree to rules that define when filibusters for nominees will be allowed, instead of just removal of the filibuster for nominees altogether, I'm pretty sure Reid would negotiate.

This comes, of course, just one week after Senator Chris Murphy led a 15 - hour filibuster for a vote on gun control.

At the moment the Democrats do not have the ability to filibuster for court nominations (except scotus)

Gorsuch will get on the bench no matter what, but let it be after the GOP ends the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees and with only GOP votes.

filibustering for 15 hours on June 15.

The GOP / Teatrolls, however, and this is the distinction, have threatened to get rid of the filibuster FOR EVERYTHING... and that is precisely what they will do if ever given a majority in the Senate ever again.

The menu of «capitol assets» and «liquid assets» includes gourmet burgers and specialty cocktails worth filibustering for.

But Smith doesnít toe the party line, instead launching a filibuster for what he believes in.

But Smith doesn't toe the party line, instead launching a filibuster for what he believes in.

While still Senate minority leader, the Kentucky Republican warned then - Majority Leader Harry Reid, D - Nev., not to go nuclear, not to end the filibuster for a few relatively minor executive nominees.

Of course, in light of the current composition of the U.S. Senate and the current President, and the precedent that the «nuclear option» can abolish the filibuster for some kinds of judicial appointments (a parliamentary ruling which is almost surely not justiciable due to express language vesting procedural questions in the U.S. Senate in the Senate and not the courts in the U.S. Constitution), this question is unlikely to present itself any time soon.

Not exact matches

All the proposals for DACA and border security funding went down in flames in February for various reasons unrelated to the filibuster.

While Congress is in the hands of a Republican majority, getting Democrats to go along with cutting taxes for the wealthiest Americans — as is Trump's plan — will be a tough sell; while the Republicans control the Senate, the Democratic minority could filibuster bills they don't like.

That kind of massive legislative backtracking, which has been largely absent in the filibuster age, could create massive uncertainty for entire industries and create the kind of nonproductive regulatory compliance work that stifles faster growth.

Over the course of the day, Paul's filibuster became a hotspot for up - and - coming Republicans, with a parade of conservative Senators — including Ted Cruz (R - Texas), Mike Lee (R - Utah), Marco Rubio (R - Fla.)

Trump also reiterated his call for McConnell to send the filibuster in a tweet on Wednesday after the failure of the latest GOP healthcare bill, and in an interview with «Fox & Friends» host Pete Hegseth.

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus has sought to downplay the divisions between Republican libertarians and the Establishment, and reiterated to reporters Monday that he thinks Sen. Paul's filibuster was a «unifying moment» for the GOP.

McConnell has batted down Trump's calls to get rid of the filibuster and is known as a stickler for Senate rules.

Senate Finance Committee aides said they planned to make adjustments to the legislation because it probably does not comply with the rules for a special Senate procedure they hope to use to pass the bill with 50 votes, rather than the 60 votes typically needed to beat a filibuster.

For one, killing the rule would actually take quite a bit of work and could face the threat of a Democratic filibuster in the Senate.

But the news «isn't a big victory» for Sen. Wendy Davis, who famously filibustered against the laws (see below), notes Atlantic Media's National Journal.

The Goodenoughs Get in Sync: A Story for Kids About the Tough Day When Filibuster Grabbed Darwin's Rabbit's Foot and the Whole Family Ended Up in the Doghouse: An Introduction to Sensory Processing Disorder and Sensory Integration by Carol Stock Kranowitz, illustrated by T.J. Wylie; 89 pages.

And as children this age establish their independence and become aware of things they can control, it's not unlike them to turn into a filibustering politician bargaining for one more story or to stay up for one more commercial break before bedtime.

Of course the bill's doomed on the Senate floor, since Republicans would no doubt filibuster it out of existence, but that's not enough for the grandly - titled «Public Advocate of the United States,» one Eugene Delgaudio of Loudon County, Virginia.

It appears to me that for budget purposes, the «reconciliation» process could be used by Senate leadership to pass legislation providing funding, circumventing the anticipated Democratic filibuster to block such legislation.

I would also like to add to @sabbahillel's answer that when the Democrats last controlled the Senate, they changed the Senate rules and eliminated the filibuster on federal judge appointments to make it easier for the Senate to approve the appointments of the Obama administration.

How have the senate rules been changed to allow for a filibuster without continued debate?

In the U.S. Senate, the filibuster allows a single senator to effectively block a vote by way of the senate rules that allow for unlimited debate, but now, the senate rules have somehow been modified so that to invoke filibuster you don't even need to actually have «debate» where you do silly things like read names from the telephone book to keep the debate going.

But given that a vote for cloture, to end a filibuster, takes 60 votes, which would require Democratic / Independent support, what reason does the majority have for excitement?

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell claimed the votes to bust a planned Democratic filibuster of Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch, as a showdown neared that could change the Senate, and the court, for generations.

In the U.S. Senate, the filibuster allows a single senator to effectively block a vote by way of the senate rules that allow for unlimited debate, but now, the senate rules have somehow been modified...

Also, I believe there is no filibuster available for tax and budget bills that go through the process called reconciliation with the House.

Unfortunately, it seems the most recent edition is from 1992, and therefore it would not contain, for example, the new filibuster rules.

During WWI a Senate filibuster blocked one of President Wilson's proposals, and he decided enough was enough and moved for a way to override filibusters.

U.S. Senate Republicans deployed the so - called «nuclear option» and changed longstanding rules to clear the way for the confirmation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to serve on the Supreme Court, bypassing a precedent - breaking Democratic filibuster by allowing the nomination to go forward on a simple majority vote.

There have been «real» filibusters since 1917, like Strom Thurmond's famous Civil Rights Act filibuster, but those were largely for show or to make a point.

U.S. Senate Republicans voted to end the filibuster of Supreme Court nominations, setting the stage for the rapid elevation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the high court and removing a pillar of the minority party's power to exert influence in the chamber.

The Senate agreed and eliminated this option from their rules, which now made unbreakable filibusters possible; they didn't actually happen for a few decades.

There was an order in there titled «To provide for expedited Senate consideration of certain nominations subject to advice and consent», but this did not appear to be the new filibuster rule.

The most obvious mechanism, which House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will set out for the President - elect, will be a Reconciliation Bill by which, because such bills are exempt from filibuster provisions in the Senate, spending and revenue - raising decisions can be driven through not just the House but also the Senate on majority votes.

US Senate Republicans ended their filibuster on Wall Street reform, allowing the measure to move onto the floor for debate.

When the Constitutional Assembly, renamed Council, after four months of work, had delivered its bill to Parliament, the minority in Parliament used unprecedented filibuster against the bill for months.

But even though Faso and Stefanik voted against their party on the tax bill, in October 2017 they voted in favor of a budget bill that paved the way for the tax measure to pass the Senate on GOP votes alone — without a filibuster.

She shared insights into her interview process, including how she prepares for pivots and filibustering by politicians, and contrasted public and commercial radio.

And, we see the reinvention of a very old technique for a digital age, in this case the filibuster, which as Tumulty's article points out, was first used in the U.S. Senate when the Constitution was in diapers.

Regardless of what you think of the modern «silent» filibuster, which gums up the works of Congress to no end, a real «talking» filibuster can be a way for a Senator to bring attention to an issue (and to himself) IF people outside the Capitol can see it.

In the Senate, the Majority Leader can call for a cloture vote — that's essentially what the sixty vote requirement for ending a filibuster is.

The fruit of these efforts is not the hoped - for Republican governing majority, but the real prospect of a filibuster - proof Democrat majority in 2009.

Senate Democrats have threatened to filibuster any provision providing money for the wall.