Sentences with phrase «filing of the action»

Filing of an action under A.R.S. § 36 - 2152 can not occur electronically; filing must occur by mail or in person (see Instructions to Minor).

The Sixth Circuit observed that defendants must remove an action to federal court either (i) 30 days from the date of filing of the action; or (ii) if the case is not initially removable, 30 days from the after receiving an amended complaint, motion, order, or any other paper etc. when it becomes apparent that the case can be removed.

The term «arbitral procedure» encompasses the period beginning with the filing of an action and ending when the award is rendered.891 The application of the law by a tribunal, on the other hand, goes to the actual merits of a dispute and therefore falls outside the scope of review at the recognition and enforcement stage.892

In Westland a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In New Hudson a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In Redford a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In Dearborn a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In Northville a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In Southgate a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

Because more than two years had passed between the accident and the filing of the action, the defendants argued that the applicable two - year limitation period had expired.

In Troy a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In South Lyon a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

In Walled Lake a judgment of divorce can be entered 60 days after the filing of the action.

However, the family court awarded wife a laptop she purchased with company funds after the filing of this action.

Perhaps you are at the point in which you may even be considering the filing of an action against a former lawyer.

The court concluded that «having successfully claimed that mediation was a required condition precedent to the filing of this action, the defendant may not now be heard to say that the delay specifically caused by the pendency of that very proceeding has resulted in the running of the statute of limitations.»