It's
a film about empathy, forgiveness and parental bonds, and another sublime low - key drama from a director who never fails to raise the emotional stakes in a subtle and sensitive manner.
Not exact matches
The
film succeeds at not just creating
empathy for these kids, but also forcing viewers to ask hard questions
about the unseen world around them.
Chaz Ebert, President of The Ebert Company and Publisher of RogerEbert.com will welcome panelists John Sloss of Cinetic Media; Cameron Bailey, Artistic Director of the Toronto International
Film Festival, and Anne Thompson of Indiewire and Thompson on Hollywood for a free - wheeling conversation
about why
empathy should be encouraged in the works of emerging writers on
film and filmmakers.
It's a
film that deserves as wide an audience as possible in spite of its forbidding length; a hugely powerful work of great
empathy and insight that features a performance from Léa Seydoux that would probably have been the most talked -
about coming out of Cannes had it not been overshadowed by that of the
film's lead Adele Exarchopolous.
There's a couple genuinely funny parts, but not enough; and while you have to love a sport where drinking is an integral part of the training regimen, at no point in the
film does one feel the slightest bit of
empathy for the players who are
about to lose their jobs... and in a movie with that as the central conflict, that's a problem.
All these years later we're still thinking
about A.I. and how the
film manages to engender so much human
empathy while remaining an essentially cold, remote work largely told from the point of view of robots.
Brice milks this (so to speak) for big laughs in a nude dance sequence — wearing convincing prosthetic dicks, Schwartzman and Scott are truly the genital equivalent of Arnold Schwarzenegger starring opposite Danny DeVito — but he also treats Alex's embarrassment with genuine
empathy, briefly turning the
film into a serious, affecting drama
about deep - seated feelings of inadequacy.
All these years later we are still thinking
about A.I. And one of the questions that inevitably comes up is just how the
film manages to engender so much profound human
empathy while remaining an essentially cold, remote work largely told from the point of view of robots.