Sadly,
the film lacks the depth in screenwriting to support them.
However, the entire
film lacks a depth of character or story.
While there are a number of laugh out loud anecdotes from the likes of Jim Jefferies, Stephen Merchant and Christopher Guest, the quantity over quality approach of
this film lacks the depth suggested by its title.
Not exact matches
If you consider Malick's The Thin Red Line, for example, you'll find a philosophical
depth that's
lacking from Gibson's
film yet it would have benefited greatly from.
Good production values for a low budget
film and good acting from the main characters and most of the cast and good pace but the story feels empty, cliché, flaw and
lack of
depth.
With a giant god like hand, Whedon destroys viewer expectation by carefully crafting the perfect satire
film with a wit, intelligence and
depth that is often
lacking in the
films it makes fun of.
Sadly, it's in service to a
film that
lacks in the way of suspense,
depth or originality.
An obsessive perfectionist who methodically worked in virtual reclusion, director Stanley Kubrick was at once widely praised for his technical brilliance and scorned for his
film's
lack of emotional
depth.
While it gives us a generally positive overview of the
film, it
lacks real
depth.
While I can enjoy «life story»
films, they tend to end up as little more than «greatest hits reels»; they zip through major events in a brisk, superficial way that usually
lacks depth.
While the
film is technically polished and visually breathtaking, it
lacks depth and becomes little more than a lawless fairy tale packed with pretty people.
Presented in widescreen and fullscreen on the same side of a dual - layer DVD, the
film's image
lacks depth here — there's a muted, Seventies quality to Barry Stone's cinematography that no doubt looked smashing on the big screen and probably would've been marginally improved at home by dispensing with the fullscreen version (thus lessening the compromise of compression), which lops a significant amount of visual information from the right side of the frame (while restoring a negligible amount to the bottom — in one shot literally a pinkie toe).
The set designers are VERY indebted to classic
films and the script is mostly weak, humourless and
lacks anything called «character
depth» or «story development».
The zany misadventures aren't enough to carry the
film, and
lacking depth of character creates a «holiday spirit» climax that is tough to care about.
Also featured is the extra «Analyzing Dark Water Sequences,» which takes an in -
depth look at the creation of three specific scenes in the
film, but the
lack of any audio commentary by the director or the all - star cast is extremely upsetting.
Or it could become a snapshot of a particular cultural era for the archives, but, nah, this
film is much too
lacking in
depth for that.
The latter infuse the
film with bass,
depth, and impact otherwise
lacking.
Shame A divisive
film in many ways, with some praising Fassbender and the
film's style, while other were put off by its
lack of
depth.
Boyle and cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle have shot the
film on digital video, a controversial choice considering the format's grainy resolution and
lack of
depth, but I think it's the right choice.
A
film that hold the audience's attention from start to finish and will play very well on both sides of the pond.The authenticity of the sets and period detail compliment the superb acting performances especially by Colin Firth.I previously thought Colin Firth
lacked depth - how wrong I was!
Welcome to the Punch sets itself up as a rather conventional genre
film, but where the writing may
lack a
depth of character or thematic weight it's more than made up for in terms of sensory - appealing thrills and a hyped up rhythm that keeps things moving along at an appropriately rapid pace.
The lower - budget visuals
lack the power and
depth of the first
film, but offer plenty of appeal on their own.
As the
film's second half leans progressively more on the mending of mother - daughter bonds and toward multiple syrupy reconciliations, the
lack of weight and
depth given to everyone besides Amy and Ruth begins taking its toll.
That flatness of thought, its
lack of
depth, renders the
film fairly careless and almost offensive in its depiction of indoctrinated sexual assault.
With more of a sense of nostalgia rather than relevance, the
film lacks a compelling narrative, and thus
lacks the
depth of many of Linklater's recent projects.
Unfortunately, the
film is uneven and has not aged well as a result, with Michael Hirst's screenplay a good work, but
lacking in some
depth and memorable moments.
However, while the six - minute and 40 - second program
lacks depth, it nonetheless provides a mildly entertaining look at the
film.
Though not without some instances worthy of merit, the
film unfortunately feels a bit hollow,
lacking in any real emotional
depth.
It's the latest effort from Laika studios, whose stop - motion wizardry previously gave us Coraline, and though ParaNorman
lacks the psychological
depth and sinister ingenuity of that Henry Selick
film, it combines genre savviness and supernatural slapstick to mostly pleasing results....
Also, the fact that Elliot only seems to like Allison for her looks leads one to not really care whether or not he ultimately ends up with the woman he so desires, and the ending of the
film only confirms this
lack of emotional
depth.
Unfortunately, this pulpy non-fiction
lacks juice and as a result, we get a
film with no fun, no humor, no
depth, and finally, no point.
Squanto adds more
depth to its favorable characters than other
films, but the bad characters are noticeably
lacking any redeeming values.
For what it's worth as regards The Incredible Hulk, I'll restate the fact that I've never been one to hop on the anti - sequel / anti-remake bandwagon (I'd rather see more double - bills of
films like Capote and Infamous than «original»
films lacking in soul or
depth), and despite his many offenses (most of them relative in my book), nor will I take part in the seemingly mandatory pastime of kicking M. Night Shyamalan when he's down.
That would have stretched out the run time, but I would rather have a longer
film than an incomplete one that ends up being shallow and
lacking the
depth that it should have.
I feel like so many
films feature bad guys that
lack depth but that isn't the case here.
Elba finds a
depth of character not provided on the page of William Nicholson's screenplay, and his maturing characterization allows the
film, which suffers from Cliffs Note - idis, a bit of
depth it would otherwise
lack.
The story is interesting enough but
lacked any real
depth and I don't really think it merited a
film about it, certainly not so soon after the events.
That's not the story being told in this
film, and it doesn't really comfortably fit in, but it gives some
depth that would otherwise be
lacking.
What the
film lacks in personality and
depth it tries to make up for in references and «easter eggs.»
The themes and settings are classic Williams, almost a pastiche, but the characters
lack the full - blooded passion and
depth of the great Williams characters and the
film compounds the weaknesses with a recreation that feels more affectation than lived life.
Both cuts of the
film sadly contain Franco's novice camerawork and total
lack of
depth in both character and story.