Not exact matches
At the time, O'Connell was working on a poster for a science - fiction and horror
film festival featuring John Carpenter's 1988 cult classic «They
Live»
about aliens
living incognito among
humans.
At the cutting edge of research in the
life sciences, a team of scientists and animators from Japan has created an astonishing new
film about the function of the
human heart.
Other
films challenged audiences to confront the role of
humans in wildlife extinction, invited viewers to think twice
about our seemingly insatiable appetites for food and fuel, and encouraged the adoption of more sustainable ways of
life.
Such a strong reaction persuaded Pixar to avoid making uncannily realistic
human characters — it has since focused its efforts on
films about living toys, curious robots and talking cars to win Academy Awards and moviegoers» hearts.
This is a
film about the
human side of technology,
about the philosophical implications raised by this strange and alluring new digital world we
live in.
But the whole
film is a missed opportunity because the situations repeatedly defy credibility, and the humor never says anything remotely fresh
about human nature or the world we
live in.
mmm... a protagonist who complete dominates a long
film to the detriment of context and the other players in the story (though the abolitionist, limping senator with the black lover does gets close to stealing the show, and is rather more interesting than the hammily - acted Lincoln); Day - Lewis acts like he's focused on getting an Oscar rather than bringing a
human being to
life - Lincoln as portrayed is a strangely zombie character, an intelligent, articulate zombie, but still a zombie; I greatly appreciate Spielberg's attempt to deal with political process and I appreciate the lack of «action» but somehow the context is missing and after seeing the
film I know some more facts but very little
about what makes these politicians tick; and the lighting is way too stylised, beautiful but unremittingly unreal, so the
film falls between the stools of docufiction and costume drama, with costume drama winning out; and the second subject of the
film - slavery - is almost complete absent (unlike Django Unchained) except as a verbal abstraction
«Her vision left an indelible mark on I Think We're Alone Now, which brings an extraordinarily thought provoking
film about human connection to
life.
Lynch isn't interested in wallowing through sadness, it's
about a moment in
human life rarely explored on
film.
After a slow start, this
film -
about a former boy genius (George Clooney) and a current girl genius (Britt Robertson) traveling to a city outside time and space - becomes a delightful and thoughtful exploration of the ways in which the future, the concept and promise of it, function in
human life.
As a fan of director Ridley Scott's original 1982 neo-noir sci - fi
film, set in a dystopian future in which
humans and androids
live side - by - side, Deakins was excited
about the idea of working on the long - discussed sequel.
Selected by Chile to represent the country in the Best Foreign Language category at the Oscars, this moving, funny, very
human film about a middle - aged woman and the obstacles that prevent a full and rich love
life has a terrific shot at making the final five nominees.
Based on his one - man show of the same name (which was in turn inspired by actual events from his
life), the
film is a witty, sharply written
human comedy
about professional rejection and the fear of commitment.
And love your
life,» Krieps explains in the clip, while co-star Leslie Manville adds, «It's a
film about human condition and how we all struggle to have something that makes us feel real and have purpose.»
The
film is a sequel to the 2015 fantasy
film about humans and monsters who
lived alongside — and at odds — with each other in ancient China, making $ 390 million.
Based on his one - man show of the same name (which was in turn inspired by actual events from his
life), the
film is a witty and consistently funny
human comedy
about the fear of commitment, and hands - down my favorite movie at this year's SXSW.
The story tells the tale of a family of four - inch - tall people, called Borrowers, who
live hidden
about the
humans or beans as they are called in the
film.
Ken Loach's latest, the winner of this year's Palme d'Or at Cannes, is one of the most important
films of 2016; there couldn't be a more timely moment for a
film about the value of citizenship, and to issue a protest against the increasingly powerful dehumanizing forces of what you might call «client culture,» the corporate logic that reduces
human lives to economic statistics or blips on screens.
Any movie like this made for the most part since the 1980s would talk the talk
about showing the changes, but not show it, show it badly and / or be more sexually oppressed than not, but Russell has zero trouble from this first
film he had control over himself dealing with all kinds of
human sexuality, yet that freedom is incidental to character study, capturing the story and bringing it to
life as he does so well here.
Indeed, the
film is no longer
about the monsters, who had been the stars of the first movie, but
about the
humans who
live among them.
Dramatic
films which have portrayed the «homefront» during times of war, and the subsequent problems of peacetime adjustment include William Wyler's Mrs. Miniver (1942)
about a separated middle - class family couple (Greer Garson and Walter Pidgeon) during the Blitz, Clarence Brown's The
Human Comedy (1943) with telegram delivery boy Mickey Rooney bringing news from the front to small - town GI families back home, John Cromwell's Since You Went Away (1944) with head of family Claudette Colbert during her husband's absence, and another William Wyler poignant classic The Best Years of Our
Lives (1946) with couples awkwardly brought back together forever changed after the war: Dana Andrews and Virginia Mayo, Fredric March and Myrna Loy, and Harold Russell and Cathy O'Donnell.
Whereas in Up we begin by being overwhelmed with truths
about the
human condition, then descend into a comparative banality that improves as the
film goes on, ending in a close approximation of the beauty of the prologue, in Inside Out we start with silly fun that threatens to go nowhere interesting, and then slowly move towards profound meditations on the meaning of
life.
Framed by the conceit that Cinderella's vermin - pals want to write a storybook
about their favourite
human, Cinderella II opens with a strange section aping Rebecca, continues with a strange section aping It's A Wonderful
Life, and concludes with a misguided apologia of the original
film's Disney - patented subtext of «beauty makes right.»
In the case of Inside Llewyn Davis, this consistent pull toward bad luck gives the
film a rare sort of melancholy, one that avoids sentimentality and pity, as well as outright cynicism, to find a strange, unmistakable truth
about the emotional bruises and physical suffering of
life as a
human or, even worse, an artist.
So the
film is
about the struggles of educators to create a successful inner city school that changes
lives, but it's also
about the people in the community and
about the
human condition.
Director Naomi Call will be our special guest, leading an audience Q&A after her
film screens; Love Unleashed, directed by Kasey Klonsky, is a short documentary that explores the deep emotional bond between
humans and their older dogs; Maybelle's Story, directed by Ellie Laks, is a short
film about a cow who had a reprieve from slaughter and getting a second chance at
life; Hope the Blind Goat by Shawn Bannon is a two minute long short
about a goat who is rescued and given a happy
life.
Through this conversation, a combination of language play, moving image and installation, Theobald explores conflicted feelings
about societal conventions, the repeated cycle of
human existence, and the ways that received wisdom
about life, love, death, freedom and personal growth feed back into daily
life through depictions in
film, television and music.