While we'll have to wait for
the final outcome in this case, the authors should be commended for acting swiftly to try to correct the record.
Not exact matches
Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency
in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse of market power (legal framework must «level the balance of market power
in negotiations...», «ensure transparency
in the transmission of market prices» and «not allow for
final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed
outcomes - perverse
outcomes in the
case of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)
What will happen
in any
case can not be predicted
in advance, nor the
final outcome of the whole process.
But the Supreme Court,
in making a determination on a similar application filed by Woyome for stay of proceedings pending the
final outcome of the
case before the African Court, argued that there was no real factual and legal basis for it to share its powers and jurisdiction with any other court, and so it can not be compelled to halt the ongoing proceedings.
We saw that most recently
in the election of 2000, where the
final votes were contested and there was some question about whether Al Gore would bring a legal
case to contest the
outcome over the vote tally
in the state of Florida.
While the
final outcome of the Vergara
case remains to be seen, the unions» firm stance against reform could help prompt tenure opponents to mount an initiative campaign — a routine occurrence
in California politics.
Whatever the
final outcome of the
case, I hope the federal government will seriously consider the actual and potential dangers that sex workers face
in their work, and push to enact legislative changes that enable them to protect themselves and to seek legal protection as needed.
An arbitration functions similarly to a trial
in which the parties present evidence, testimony and argument to an arbitrator who will then make a
final decision on the
outcome of the
case.
I've won one
case where this happened (where there was extensive email correspondence between business lawyers regarding the changes that would be made
in each draft and there the version signed did not correspond to the last version signed electronically
in a very long document on paper and there were other indicia of fraud), but by far the more common
outcome is to bind the party signing the document (especially
in a commercial context) and to consider failing to carefully read all terms of the
final draft to be negligent on the part of the party signing the contract.
The speed with which you hire legal representation can make all the difference
in the
final outcome of your
case, since it could determine whether you are successful
in having the charges against you dismissed or if you end up being convicted and sentenced to a lengthy term
in federal prison.
The quality of the Manassas child custody lawyer that a parent chooses
in their
case may significantly impact the
final outcome of the
case.
Do you have a view on whether or not a successful legal challenge prior to notification would effectively thwart any subsequent challenge;
in the
case of article 50 having been invoked (following Parlimentary consent) and another group wish to contest the
outcome of negotiations by launching a new legal challenge requesting that Parliment once again be asked to approve the
final deal.
Does it at all affect the
outcome of existing
cases, when someone quotes an older
case trying to prove a point to obtain a decision X, where
in actuality the
final decision of such old
cases were to finally rule against X?
It's interesting that you place an accent on «distinguishable», whereas
in reality, I've never seen any of the
case law references actually mention the
final outcome of any of the
cases they mention, and, overall, it seems like the probability of favourable / non-favourable decision of the referenced
case is like, perhaps, 50/50.
The court procedure
in Financial Remedy applications means that approximately 90 % of all
cases settle at the Financial Dispute Resolution hearing, which is akin to
in - court mediation, rather than go to a
final hearing when a judge determines the
outcome.
While it is obvious the justices retain the
final say
in the
outcome of a
case, the process of research and writing undertaken by the clerks may help shape the judgments
in a fundamental way.
There, the woman
in a Family law
case represented herself and
in terms of the
final outcome, was the successful party overall.
Appellate judges often disagree on the appropriate comparator group
in equality
cases, which has a direct impact on the
final outcome.
As time goes by,
in fact, these
cases seem to become more common, with claimants seeming to have the upper hand more often than not
in the
final outcome.
2) If there is no investigation required to be done, the claim has to be settled within 30 days 3)
In case a detailed investigation has to be done, then the same has to be completed within 6 months and the
final outcome: claim settlement or repudiation has to be conveyed to the nominee / beneficiary.
In determining the final outcome of the case, there is presumption that a parent may relocate, but the presumption may be rebutted by the factors set forth in the statut
In determining the
final outcome of the
case, there is presumption that a parent may relocate, but the presumption may be rebutted by the factors set forth
in the statut
in the statute.
The judge has the
final say
in your
case's
outcome, not you.
However, when employed
in the appropriate
case, the Settlement Agreement reached is almost always more satisfactory and effective to both spouses, because each has had a full opportunity to be a part of the developmental stages of the
final outcome.
Final Report (PDF - 125 KB) Winokur, Crawford, & Longobardi (2006) Uses a matched
case design to compare children
in kinship care with children
in foster care on available child welfare
outcomes.
What is equally important here
in comparison to the
final outcome of the vote is the interest that you all will, or will not display herein, as the
case may be, regarding your attention to and response to the past, present and projected actions of CREA.