The BBB is known to investigate claims of this nature, but it has little sway over
the final outcome of your appeal.
Not exact matches
The twelve judges
of the Constitutional Court (appointed by the Spanish parliament, central Government and the General Council
of the Judiciary) took nearly four years to deal with the
appeal, generating constant uncertainty regarding the
final outcome.
This case involved Ms Kaur, a nurse, who argued that her employer's instigation, handling and
outcome (a
final written warning, upheld at internal
appeal)
of its disciplinary process following her altercation with a colleague, was unreasonable such that it amounted to a repudiatory breach
of the implied term
of mutual trust and confidence.
Deference is not justified by arguing that trial judges are always right about such matters, but rather that having a
final outcome is preferable to having a reversal that encourages more
appeals in the name
of achieving «perfect justice» (which dovetails,
of course, with «justice as proportionality» arguments that getting what is arguably the «right answer» is often not worth the public or private cost).
The Manitoba Court
of Appeal also found that a «beneficiary need not suffer an actual loss in order to be entitled to a remedy» (at paragraph 23) and «given the shameful conduct on the part
of the appellant fiduciary» (at paragraph 26) it ordered the appellant to pay the funds to the court pending the
final outcome of the administration
of the estate, while repeatedly emphasizing the obligations
of a committee and the lengths the court will go to in upholding this fiduciary relationship.
My case, which is still under
final appeal is yet to be resolved and the
outcome of the
appeal is neither here nor there.