Sentences with phrase «final ruling by the court»

Joe Sandler, counsel for the HIA, stated: «The Court's order effectively prevents the DEA from enforcing its Interpretive Rule «until a final ruling by the Court on the validity of the DEA's action.

A final ruling by the court is expected three to six months after the AG's opinion — so likely by November.

Not exact matches

On Sunday, a federal court rejected a request by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline but said that ruling was «not the final word,» as a necessary easement still needed government approval.

While the court's final ruling is yet to come, Banco del Estado de Chile and Itau Corpbanca have been ordered by the court to remove the block imposed on the accounts of cryptocurrency exchanges.

Alonso said he expects the final budget that is eventually approved by Congress to include a weakened form of the Clean Power Plan because the EPA is unlikely to attempt to challenge a Supreme Court ruling saying the EPA is required to regulate carbon dioxide.

The APA notice - and - comment process recognizes that changes may be made to the proposed rule based on the public comments received, but the courts have required that any changes made in the final rule be of a type that could have been reasonably anticipated by the public — a logical outgrowth of the proposal.

In its final ruling of 26 June 2013 the court stated that all the documents whose return was being demanded must be given back by January 2014, and that the Anne Frank House could not lay any claim to the documents of which it believed it was the owner.

By the time a final ruling is made, the Obama administration believes that, as was the case with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, industry will have already done so much to comply with the rule, that the high court's decision will be almost irrelevant.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA — Vote Hemp expects the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to rule on a Motion to Stay the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) «Final Rule» on hemp food products by the end of this wrule on a Motion to Stay the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) «Final Rule» on hemp food products by the end of this wRule» on hemp food products by the end of this week.

Pursuant to Clean Air Act § 307 (b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7607 (b)(1), Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and D.C. Circuit Rule 15, Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Hoosier Environmental Council, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ohio Citizen Action, and Sierra Club (collectively, «Petitioners») hereby petition this Court for review of the 2 final action taken by Respondents U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Administrator Scott Pruitt in the attached memorandum from William L. Wehrum, dated January 25, 2018 (Attachment 1), and in the Federal Register notice published at 83 Fed.

215, 795 S.E. 2d 485 (2017), where the Virginia Court of Appeals upheld the Circuit Court ruling the attorney ex-husband was in contempt of court for failing to abide by the terms of the final deCourt of Appeals upheld the Circuit Court ruling the attorney ex-husband was in contempt of court for failing to abide by the terms of the final deCourt ruling the attorney ex-husband was in contempt of court for failing to abide by the terms of the final decourt for failing to abide by the terms of the final decree.

Applying the Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27, the Court noted that «subject to certain well - known exceptions, the general rule is that when an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, whether on the same or a different claim.»

As part of the Supreme Court's August 27, 2014 Administrative Order revising implementation of the 365 day rule, «In the event no request for a final hearing is received by the Clerk of Court within the time period prescribed and there is no other order by the Chief Administrative Judge extending the case, the Clerk of Court shall prepare an Order of Dismissal without prejudice and provide the order and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.»

Differently than the procedure for preliminary rulings before the CJEU, which allows the latter Court to use a wider margin of appreciation when it assesses the admissibility of the referring order and to rephrase its scope and content in the light of EU law (as it did with the request from the Tribunale di Cuneo that started the Taricco saga), the ICC is more strictly bound by the correspondence between such order and the final ruling.

The KRG relied on a decision by Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Democratic Republic of Congo and others v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC [2011] HK CFAR 395 where the Court followed Mighell in the context of the PRC rule of absolute immunity, rather than restrictive immunity which does not operate in respect of commercial transactions.

In this class of cases, we think the rule of action which should govern the civil courts, founded in a broad and sound view of the relations of church and state under our system of laws, and supported by a preponderating weight of judicial authority, is that whenever the questions of discipline or of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom, or law have been decided by the highest of these church judicatories to which the matter has been carried, the legal tribunals must accept such decisions as final and as binding on them in their application to the case before them.

Pursuant to Article 402 of the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure, a final and binding judgment or ruling rendered by a foreign court will be recognised except for certain situations, one of which is violating due process of law or the public policy of Taiwan.

Response: Under the final rule, if the disclosure is pursuant to an order of a court or administrative tribunal, covered entities may disclose only the protected health information expressly authorized by the order.

Thus, in the final rule we provide that a covered entity may disclose protected health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful process that is not accompanied by a court order if it receives satisfactory assurance from the party seeking the request that the requesting party has made a good faith attempt to provide written notice to the individual that includes sufficient information about the litigation or proceeding to permit the individual to raise an objection to the court or administrative tribunal and that the time for the individual to raise objections has elapsed (and that none were filed or all have been resolved).

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in compliance with and as limited by relevant requirements of: a court order or court - ordered warrant, or a subpoena or summons issued by a judicial officer.

Under the final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in response to a court or administrative order, provided that only the protected health information expressly authorized by the order is disclosed.

Rules of Procedure for Administrative Appeals: These rules govern the procedures in all circuit courts for judicial review of final orders or decisions from an agency in contested cases that are governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, W.Rules of Procedure for Administrative Appeals: These rules govern the procedures in all circuit courts for judicial review of final orders or decisions from an agency in contested cases that are governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, W.rules govern the procedures in all circuit courts for judicial review of final orders or decisions from an agency in contested cases that are governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, W. Va..

However, we note that the final rule limits the permitted disclosures by covered entities in court or administrative proceedings to only that information which is specified in the order from a court or an administrative body should provide a degree of protection for individuals from unnecessary disclosure.

In § 164.512 (e) of the final rule, we permit covered entities to disclose protected health information in a judicial or administrative proceeding if the request for such protected health information is made through or pursuant to an order from a court or administrative tribunal or in response to a subpoena or discovery request from, or other lawful process by a party to the proceeding.

The final destination of your Wells Nevada traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Wells Nevada court.

The final destination of your Westminster Colorado traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Westminster Colorado court.

The final destination of your Aberdeen Washington traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Aberdeen Washington court.

The final destination of your Ennis Montana traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Ennis Montana court.

The final destination of your West Richland Washington traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your West Richland Washington court.

The final destination of your Colton South Dakota traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Colton South Dakota court.

The final destination of your Joliet Montana traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Joliet Montana court.

The final destination of your Nashua Montana traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Nashua Montana court.

The final destination of your Hannibal Missouri traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Hannibal Missouri court.

The final destination of your Lamar Alabama traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Lamar Alabama court.

The final destination of your Cheraw South Carolina traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Cheraw South Carolina court.

The final destination of your Rolling Fork Mississippi traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Rolling Fork Mississippi court.

The final destination of your Paris Texas traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Paris Texas court.

The final destination of your Rockville Maryland traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Rockville Maryland court.

The final destination of your Cedar Park Texas traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Cedar Park Texas court.

The final destination of your Reading Pennsylvania traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Reading Pennsylvania court.

The final destination of your Johnstown Pennsylvania traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Johnstown Pennsylvania court.

The final destination of your Clinton South Carolina traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Clinton South Carolina court.

The final destination of your Vinton Louisiana traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Vinton Louisiana court.

The final destination of your Thomasville Georgia traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Thomasville Georgia court.

The final destination of your Mint Hill North Carolina traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Mint Hill North Carolina court.

The final destination of your Elsmere Kentucky traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Elsmere Kentucky court.

The final destination of your Salisbury North Carolina traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Salisbury North Carolina court.

The final destination of your Toledo Ohio traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Toledo Ohio court.

The final destination of your Bellevue Kentucky traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Bellevue Kentucky court.

The final destination of your Wamsutter Wyoming traffic school certificate of completion depends on the rules set by your Wamsutter Wyoming court.