Sentences with phrase «final ruling in the case»

A final ruling in the case is expected by the end of next week.

Then again, the current court could make a final ruling in the case even before the court makeup shifts in January as a result of the Nov. 5 elections.

The court is scheduled to issue a final ruling in the case on February 9th.

I am currently trying to get compensation for a (heavily) delayed flight; whether or not I will receive it will depend on the Court's final ruling in this case.

Not exact matches

Up until recently, many considered the case closed — that is, open Internet principles were largely preserved, after the Federal Communications Committee Chairman Tom Wheeler published a final ruling on the matter in March.

Disney shareholders lost their case but the final ruling set a new bar for directors when approving these kinds of exit packages: «If a director acts with conscious disregard — in other words, a looking away — rather than a deliberate intent to violate his duties, he can still be held liable for acting in bad faith,» plaintiffs» attorney Steven G. Schullman told the New York Times back in 2006.

The Liberals are unlikely to make any final decision on drug testing until the Supreme Court of Canada rules on its legality in a case between Suncor and workers at its Alberta oil sands operation, said Troy Winters, senior health and safety officer with the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

In that case, contingencies explain that «the Final Settlement Value will be determined in accordance with the By - Laws and Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation («OCC»).&raquIn that case, contingencies explain that «the Final Settlement Value will be determined in accordance with the By - Laws and Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation («OCC»).&raquin accordance with the By - Laws and Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation («OCC»).»

If this be the case, then an understanding of the kingdom in three senses — the eternal, righteous rule of the sovereign God; the call to moral obedience in love; and an apocalyptic final consummation — seems less inconsistent in the thought of Jesus than they have often been assumed to be.

The theocracies found in Iran and Saudi Arabia, where the clerics play a major role in government (or have the final say on any government action in the case of Iran), tend to be the exception, rather than the rule.

Today, however, such a system is not commonly practiced and most parliamentary system parties» rules provide for a leadership election in which the general membership of the party is permitted to vote at some point in the process (either directly for the new leader or for delegates who then elect the new leader in a convention), though in many cases the party's legislators are allowed to exercise a disproportionate influence in the final vote.

«Judge Philip Minardo's procedural ruling is not the final decision in this case.

Yes, the Man Booker Prize not only goes to a book published in the UK by a «formal» publishing house (don't worry, just in case you're confused and think your book is eligible, the rules are nice enough to state further down that you're not welcome), but also expects the publishers of the six books whittled down to the shortlist to foot the bill for advertising to the world that this book made it to the finals.

In the case of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, for example, the Supreme Court didn't make a final ruling until 2008, 19 years after the spill.

One of the most exciting and unique things about the xenosaga series is that you can look foward to seeing different character models with each new game because appearence of the characters change with each game, not because the characters have aged but for other reasons.There is one special thing that xenosaga episode three has that should have been in the other xenosaga games is the swimsuit mode because it allows you to watch movie scenes with the characters in there swimsuits but for some reason not all of the movie scenes in xenosaga 3 can be viewed in swimsuit mode, I guess it would have made the movie less serious or something.My favorite movie scenes in xenosaga are blue testament, white testament, KOSMOS verses Black Testament, any movie with Luis Virgil becaus ehe is my favorite character in the game because he's passionate and i don't think that he is a bad guy since he was able to brek free from being a testament and the only real reasons why he became a testament was because he wanted to be able to visit that old church on miltia and to gain power to prevent death.I also love Luis Virgil and all of the movie scenes that he appear in becaus they are very dramatic.The best thing about the xenosaga series is thst the story is very dee, interesting, and shocking and anyone who has played the game in order from episode one through three will definitely say the same thing.There is no doubt that anyone who has completed episode one and two will be stunned when every secret and mystery is unraveled in episode three.The one thing that I can't seem to under stand is why do some of the characters have to travel back to the earth in the end, will shion and the gang make it back to earth or will there descendants finish the mission and find earth in the end, Chaos and Nephilim told the group that the key to saving humanity lies on earth, what I want to know is what is it and how will it be used to save the universe, Even in the end new mysteries arose and remained unraveled.If there is any one outher who has has the awnswer to any of these questions please let me know when you write you're review or else there has just got to be a xenosaga four on the way, (crying) they just can't leave the story end this way.The only thing that dissapointed me about the game at first was the battle system because on the back of the case of xenosaga three said that the best aspect of the previous battles systems from episode one were combined to form a new battle system, If namco had really done this Xenosaga episode three would have had a better battle system in my opinion because I belive that the best aspect of xenosaga episode one were the special atacks wich are better than the those of episode three and the best aspect of episode three as the break system wich was also better than those of episode three.I think that namco should have given xenosaga episode 3 the battle system of episode 2 combined episode ones style of special attack, but doing this would have probably made the battle system of xenosaga episode three boring because the same old tactics would have to be used in a new game and the battle system most likely would not be as realistic as it is but it would probably be cooler.However the ability to summon all four Erde Kaisers including the new Erde Kasier Sgma my most favorite summon in the world at will and use new Ether and Tech attacks along with the new Counter and Revenge abilities gave xenosaaga episode three more than boost that it needed to have an descent battle systemThe E.S battle system of xenosaga episode 3 is way more better than those of episod one and two though, I must say that Namco really outdid themselves with the E.S battle system of xenosaga episode because the other E.S battle system from the two previos games weren't good, luckily they made up for it with the character battle system.In episode one I never really wanted to use anA.G.W.S, lucky for me they were optional but in episode two sadly it is manatory that you pilot an E.S to progress in the game in Episode three you piloting an E.S is also mandatory to progress in the game but the difference between the three episode is that will be sorry in episode three you will ge glad that you are using an E.S because their battle system is extremely cool.Xenosaga is most definitely one of the besrt RPG games in the world andit is far more better than any final fantasy game that Square Enix has ever made but for some reason it still score lower than Some Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES final fantasy game that Square Enix has ever made but for some reason it still score lower than Some Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES RULE!

In substantiation of the claim of the ECJ's «repeated» rulings on the topic references to three cases are proffered: one from 1957, another from 1961, and a final case from 2005.

If the opposing party in your case appeals a final ruling of a trial court or agency or board, that party is the «appellant» and you are the «appellee.»

Accordingly, more detailed comments on tax rulings must be included in the final version of the draft notice on the notion of state aid, especially if the OECD guidelines are to be regarded as appropriate guidance in all cases.

The author also discusses the blood quantum rule, cultural appropriation, Indigenous use of intellectual property laws, Two - Spirit identities (Indigenous transgender individuals), the landmark Delgamuukw and Tsilhqot» in cases (recognition of Aboriginal title), non-benign myths about Indigenous peoples, the six - volume Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) final report on the residential school system where at least 6,000 Indigenous children died, Canada's Stolen Generations (between 1960 and 1990, 70 - 90 % of Indigenous children in Canada were removed from their homes and placed into non-Indigenous homes), Inuit relocations, the issue of access to safe drinking water for First Nations communities, the five - volume report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Indigenous lands, education, treaties, and treaty - making.

In a fifth case the Supreme Court issued its final judgment on a matter that had already been sent to Luxembourg for preliminary rulings on two occasions; it concerned the limitation period applying to claims brought against producers of goods (O'Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKHL 23).

Within the past few years the South Carolina Supreme Court has promulgated one rule in which family court cases are dismissed if no final hearing is requested within 365 days of the date the action is filed and another rule in which cases need to be mediated in most counties (including all three local countries: -LSB-...]

Within the past few years the South Carolina Supreme Court has promulgated one rule in which family court cases are dismissed if no final hearing is requested within 365 days of the date the action is filed and another rule in which cases need to be mediated in most counties (including all three local countries: Berkeley, Charleston and Dorchester) before the docketing clerk can grant trial dates.

As part of the Supreme Court's August 27, 2014 Administrative Order revising implementation of the 365 day rule, «In the event no request for a final hearing is received by the Clerk of Court within the time period prescribed and there is no other order by the Chief Administrative Judge extending the case, the Clerk of Court shall prepare an Order of Dismissal without prejudice and provide the order and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.»

The leading case handed down over twenty years ago was Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 (1990), where the Supreme Court of Canada set out a three - pronged test: when a public body's decision is administrative and final in nature, is made under a statute or code, and affects the interests or rights of the accused person, then the rules of procedural fairness must be followed.

In this class of cases, we think the rule of action which should govern the civil courts, founded in a broad and sound view of the relations of church and state under our system of laws, and supported by a preponderating weight of judicial authority, is that whenever the questions of discipline or of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom, or law have been decided by the highest of these church judicatories to which the matter has been carried, the legal tribunals must accept such decisions as final and as binding on them in their application to the case before theIn this class of cases, we think the rule of action which should govern the civil courts, founded in a broad and sound view of the relations of church and state under our system of laws, and supported by a preponderating weight of judicial authority, is that whenever the questions of discipline or of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom, or law have been decided by the highest of these church judicatories to which the matter has been carried, the legal tribunals must accept such decisions as final and as binding on them in their application to the case before thein a broad and sound view of the relations of church and state under our system of laws, and supported by a preponderating weight of judicial authority, is that whenever the questions of discipline or of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom, or law have been decided by the highest of these church judicatories to which the matter has been carried, the legal tribunals must accept such decisions as final and as binding on them in their application to the case before thein their application to the case before them.

Article 27 (1) Where the immediate appeal referred to in paragraph (4) of Article 35 (Inspection, etc. of the Portion related to the Examination of the Facts) of the Act is filed, if the court of prior instance finds no need to forward the record of the case pertaining to personal status litigation, it is sufficient for a court clerk of the court of prior instance to forward only the record of the appeal case to a court clerk of the court in charge of the appeal, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 174 (Forwarding of Record due to Filing of Appeal to Second Instance) of the Rules of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 205 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance or Final Appeal) of said Rules.

Justices approve individual appeals in combined cases: Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a final decision in one of multiple consolidated cases can be immediately appealed while the other cases are still pending.

Sigrún, I have not had time to fully read the EFTA Court's ruling in the ESA v. Iceland case, so I haven't a final judgment of the ruling.

The full panel ruling is interesting for how it applied Nebraska's sex offender registry law, but a final footnote highlights some broader constitutional questions the panel saw implicated in the case.

Does it at all affect the outcome of existing cases, when someone quotes an older case trying to prove a point to obtain a decision X, where in actuality the final decision of such old cases were to finally rule against X?

It may comprise: advice on complying with pre-action protocols; exploring the different avenues available for alternative dispute resolution (ADR); providing clients with a glossary of terms they will be come across in the court process; instruction sheets in plain English to explain aspects of procedure and the essential law to be applied (translated to be available in Welsh or foreign languages); how to provide disclosure; preparing court documents such as witness statements, case and costs summaries, chronologies and skeleton arguments; complying with the Rules in relation to service of documents, the preparation of statements of case, the appointment and instruction of expert witnesses; the importance of CPR Pt 36; or how to prepare for and what to expect at a financial dispute resolution (FDR) or a final hearing / trial.

Since covered entities may also perform duties of a coroner or medical examiner, where a covered entity is itself a coroner or medical examiner, the final rule permits the covered entity to use protected health information in all cases in which it is permitted to disclose such information for its duties as a coroner or medical examiner.

The definition in the final rule recognizes that law enforcement officials are empowered to prosecute cases as well as to conduct investigations and civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings.

In addition, where a covered health care provider is also a health care component of a correctional institution, the final rule permits the covered entity to use protected health information in all cases in which it is permitted to disclose such informatioIn addition, where a covered health care provider is also a health care component of a correctional institution, the final rule permits the covered entity to use protected health information in all cases in which it is permitted to disclose such informatioin all cases in which it is permitted to disclose such informatioin which it is permitted to disclose such information.

In this final rule, the only absolute requirement is the removal of full - face photographs, and we depend on the «catch - all» of «any other unique * * * characteristic * * *» to pick up the unusual case where another type of photographic image might be used to identify an individual.

If the tribal laws impose more stringent privacy standards on disclosures for research, such as requiring informed consent in all cases, nothing in the final rule would preclude compliance with those more stringent privacy standards.

The final rule allows for disclosures to coroners or medical examiners in this limited case.

For example, if a state insurance department is acting as a health plan in operating the state's Medicaid managed care program, the final rule allows the insurance department to use protected health information in all cases for which the plan can disclose the protected health information for health oversight purposes.

For cases involving patients admitted to a health care facility in an incapacitated or emergency treatment circumstance who during the course of their stay become capable of decisionmaking, the final rule takes an approach similar to that described in the NPRM.

In the final rule, we provide that where a business associate is required by law to act as a business associate to a covered entity, the covered entity may disclose protected health information to the business associate to the extent necessary to comply with the legal mandate without Start Printed Page 82507meeting the requirement to have a business associate contract (or, in the case of government agencies, a memorandum of understanding or law pertaining to the business associate) if it makes a good faith attempt the obtain satisfactory assurances required by this section and, if unable to do so, documents the attempt and the reasons that such assurances can not be obtaineIn the final rule, we provide that where a business associate is required by law to act as a business associate to a covered entity, the covered entity may disclose protected health information to the business associate to the extent necessary to comply with the legal mandate without Start Printed Page 82507meeting the requirement to have a business associate contract (or, in the case of government agencies, a memorandum of understanding or law pertaining to the business associate) if it makes a good faith attempt the obtain satisfactory assurances required by this section and, if unable to do so, documents the attempt and the reasons that such assurances can not be obtainein the case of government agencies, a memorandum of understanding or law pertaining to the business associate) if it makes a good faith attempt the obtain satisfactory assurances required by this section and, if unable to do so, documents the attempt and the reasons that such assurances can not be obtained.

The «minimum necessary» policy in the final rule has essentially three components: first, it does not pertain to certain uses and disclosures including treatment - related exchange of information among health care providers; second, for disclosures that are made on a routine basis, such as insurance claims, a covered entity is required to have policies and procedures governing such exchanges (but the rule does not require a case - by - case determination in such cases); and third, providers must have a process for reviewing non-routine requests on a case - by - case basis to assure that only the minimum necessary information is disclosed.

Rules of Procedure for Administrative Appeals: These rules govern the procedures in all circuit courts for judicial review of final orders or decisions from an agency in contested cases that are governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, W.Rules of Procedure for Administrative Appeals: These rules govern the procedures in all circuit courts for judicial review of final orders or decisions from an agency in contested cases that are governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, W.rules govern the procedures in all circuit courts for judicial review of final orders or decisions from an agency in contested cases that are governed by the Administrative Procedures Act, W. Va..

In the final rule, we permit, and in some cases require, covered entities to obtain the individual's written permission for the covered entity to use or disclose protected health information other than psychotherapy notes to carry out treatment, payment, and health care operationIn the final rule, we permit, and in some cases require, covered entities to obtain the individual's written permission for the covered entity to use or disclose protected health information other than psychotherapy notes to carry out treatment, payment, and health care operationin some cases require, covered entities to obtain the individual's written permission for the covered entity to use or disclose protected health information other than psychotherapy notes to carry out treatment, payment, and health care operations.

In the final rule, we expand the circumstances under which limited information about suspects, fugitives, material witnesses, and missing persons may be disclosed, to include not only cases in which law enforcement officials are seeking to identify such individuals, but also cases in which law enforcement officials are seeking to locate such individualIn the final rule, we expand the circumstances under which limited information about suspects, fugitives, material witnesses, and missing persons may be disclosed, to include not only cases in which law enforcement officials are seeking to identify such individuals, but also cases in which law enforcement officials are seeking to locate such individualin which law enforcement officials are seeking to identify such individuals, but also cases in which law enforcement officials are seeking to locate such individualin which law enforcement officials are seeking to locate such individuals.

The final rule modifies the NPRM requirements for cases in which an incapacitated patient is admitted to a health care facility.

In many cases, under this final rule, the individual will have consented to these uses and disclosures.

As in the NPRM, the final rule provides that when a covered entity is also an oversight agency, it is allowed to use protected health information in all cases in which it is allowed to disclose such information for health oversight purposes.

Michael Lacy sees the ruling as resolving «in a very final way» the debate in the cases, and among academics, about what the phrase «obtained in a manner» means in relation to s. 24 (2).

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the final ruling in Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner (Case C - 362 / 14) on October 6, 2015.

Note that when a temporary relief hearing and a final hearing may be scheduled depends on which county in Florida the case is filed, as each county has varying rules of procedure.