Sentences with phrase «final theory»

... so you're implying «most of us» have put forth a proven / final theory of everything?

Throughout you will be also watching videos matching the chapters from your book in your dive centre classroom before being tested with one final theory exam, and off to the water you go!

If superstring theory offered the one true final theory describing all of fundamental physics, how could there be more than one?

Theoretical physicists working in the general area of string theory are chasing his ultimate ambition, attempting to capture both quantum mechanics and relativity in a broader, more fundamental final theory.

One thing that final theory absolutely can not allow is a singularity at the Big Bang.

(3) And Not like most of us... Mr. Hawking has not put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything... the key word here... theory.

I don't think you meant what you said in the following statement: «And Not like most of us... Mr. Hawking has not put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything...»

Dreams of a Final Theory by steven weinberg pantheon, 338 pages, $ 25 In the second - to - last chapter of his new book, Dreams of a Final Theory, Steven Weinberg writes, «It would be wonderful to find in the laws of nature a plan prepared by a concerned creator in which human beings played....

From the standpoint of Whitehead's final theory, as interpreted in terms of Hartshorne's distinction between God's abstract nature and concrete totality, it is quite natural to interpret the last sentence as Griffin does: «The passage does not say that God as a whole must be unchanging; it only says that God's nature must remain self - consistent» (PS 15:200).

In his final theory physical theories receive their complete integration in the very last phase of concrescence, but this intermediate theory follows naturally enough from earlier concepts in which mental occasions superseded physical ones.

Our final theories of subjectivity (R, S and T) place being first in the final superject.

Strictly, as in the theory of subjective unity, this means «compatible for integration» at every phase, but it can mean simply «that which will be made compatible in the final unity» which is all that is needed for the final theory.

In terms of the final theory, however, we should have expected it to end «by reason of the subjective aim, «12 or even to say:

From the vantage point of Whitehead's final theory, it is very difficult to see how the original datum as conceived in the Giffords draft could ever be significantly modified by the ensuing concrescence.

This final theory has two momentous consequences: (1) Becoming could not be adequately understood on the model of a «leaf becoming green», where there is some being sustaining the activity of change.

In the final theory, becoming is not a species of being, for being is first produced by becoming (7) 14 Yet when the first categoreal condition was formulated (R), becoming was conceived as a kind of being.

Without the author's having touched on the history and events leading up to the final theory, the theory is not so profound and meaningful as it ought to be.

[168] A final theory, put forward after the election, was the «Lazy Labour» factor, which claimed that Labour voters tend to not vote on polling day whereas Conservative voters have a much higher turnout.

Physicists have long sought to find one final theory that would unify all of physics.

Although there is as yet no final theory of quantum gravity, there are several candidate theories being actively explored.

«He saw that if you believed quantum theory was a final theory, that is where it took you.

«At the time of its new popularity,» he says, «there was a declaration that we had solved all the problems in physics and had the final theory in hand.»

The final theory, should it ever emerge, seems certain to be the work of many minds.

IS THERE a Final Theory in physics?

In the 1980s, attention switched to superstring theory as the leading candidate for a final theory.

«If there does not exist a simple description that captures the final theory in just one equation, we won't let that stop us,» he says.

My view, though, is that while inflation points us in the right direction, it is not the final theory.

It's not even really a theory but more of an intuition about what a final theory of everything might be like.

«When I proposed this, I didn't claim I had the final theory,» he says.

James Randi, famous debunker of frauds, talks about the «Amaz!ng Meeting» coming up in Las Vegas, and SciAm editor Mark Alpert discusses his new physics novel, Final Theory.

Disagreeing On Everything As theoretical physicists, we deplore the publication of A. Garrett Lisi and James Owen Weatherall's «A Geometric Theory of Everything,» as well as of Zeeya Merali's «Rummaging for a Final Theory» [News Scan] in the September issue, which was PR - level praise of Lisi's research that presented him as struggling against an entrenched establishment.

After completing all our dives, it was time for a final theory test.

Without the author's having touched on the history and events leading up to the final theory, the theory is not so profound and meaningful as it ought to be.

The final theory could impose liability on a party if the contracting party «launched the instrument of harm».