Sentences with phrase «final written response»

Normally, you will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint and 6 years of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring (or within 3 years of when you should reasonably have known there were grounds for complaint).
Normally, you will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within six months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint and within six years of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring (or if outside of this period, within three years of when you should reasonably have been aware of it).
If a final written response is not received within the designated time limits FCI will inform the complainant that they may refer the matter to The Property Ombudsman Scheme.
Normally, you will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint.
In normal circumstances, the LeO will only investigate a matter if referred to it within six months of the conclusion of our complaints handling process (i.e., the date on which a final written response in respect of the matter is received).
Normally, you will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within six months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within six years of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring (or if outside of this period, within three years of when you should reasonably have been aware of it).
Please note that you can usually only contact the Ombudsman within 12 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint.
You must usually refer your complaint within six months of our final written response to your complaint and within six years of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring (or within three years of you becoming aware of it).

Not exact matches

Teigen's final tweet to Trump — aka the «no one likes you» memo — was in response to a July 23 post where he wrote, «It's very sad that Republicans, even some that were carried over the line on my back, do very little to protect their President.»
The final essay was written by Eliade specifically for this volume and is of particular interest as it is his first public response to Altizer's book Mircea Eliade and the Dialectic of the Sacred.
In response, some wag wrote a letter, published in the Guardian newspaper of the day on which I write, saying: «what an honour it is to have a letter printed in the final edition of the Guardian.»
Being the initiator of this project, he has already written and submitted an official proposal to the European Union and currently awaits a final response.
Goldberg, Roswell and Michaels (1995/1996) examined whether the MSPAP which required students to engage in the writing process (including drafting, peer response, revision, and writing a final draft), produced improved performance in writing.
Rather than initially presenting teacher candidates with the position statement principles, it allows them to see, firsthand, the effects of computerized grading on student writing and to formulate considered, persuasive responses to the final path question, thus developing cognitive flexibility with regard to this sensitive issue.
After your students have completed their final drafts and written their responses in their leaf templates, you will be able to create a dynamic and colorful autumn bulletin board display.
Sample assessment activities include oral response to visual stimuli, oral presentations, role playing, writing tasks (email, blog, news article, creative story, advertisement), reading comprehension tasks, quizzes, unit tests, and a final exam.
This ocean unit comes with printable student books (facts, note taking pages, common core response questions), printable teacher notes, and follow - up student writing papers (rough draft and final copy)!
The Center's role in this project is to recruit lead authors and contributors for the third report; ensure that a steady stream of literature reviews are written and posted on the NIPCC Web site; ensure that the lead authors produce a manuscript; revise the manuscript in response to comments by peer reviewers; and deliver final manuscripts to the publisher in time to meet the publication schedule.
In its final written submission to the Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel (JRP), the government of British Columbia states that it can not support the project as presented to the panel primarily because Northern Gateway (NG) has been unable to adequately detail its response to a spill.
Thus, in the final rule we provide that a covered entity may disclose protected health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful process that is not accompanied by a court order if it receives satisfactory assurance from the party seeking the request that the requesting party has made a good faith attempt to provide written notice to the individual that includes sufficient information about the litigation or proceeding to permit the individual to raise an objection to the court or administrative tribunal and that the time for the individual to raise objections has elapsed (and that none were filed or all have been resolved).
Response: In the final rule, we have added an additional waiver criteria to require that there are adequate written assurances from the researcher that protected health information will not be re-used or disclosed to any other person or entity, except as required by law, for authorized oversight of the research project, or for other research for which the use or disclosure of protected health information would be permitted by this subpart.
This course includes a variety of readings, short films, hands - on activities, short written responses, quizzes, and a final paper and exam.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z