At the Vancouver Courthouse, downtown at Robson Square,
financial debt claims under Rule 9.2 go to a Summary Trial.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance
debt, including our ability to obtain the
debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation,
claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty
claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Those
debt concerns have led some to
claim that shadow banking in the Chinese economy could eventually lead to a
financial crisis if the bubble pops.
Movements in asset values are self - reinforcing not because of crowd opinion, but because of the accumulation and decumulation of
debt and other
financial claims.
According to the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), roughly half of all collections that appear on credit reports are reported by
debt collectors seeking to collect on medical bills
claimed to be owed to hospitals and other medical providers.
Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau taking complaints from consumers having problems with third - party «
debt relief» services
claiming to help with student loans.
Despite offers that sound legitimate, these companies have been the focus of consumer alerts from the
Financial Consumer Agency of Canada and often
claim to be part of a government program, when in fact no such program or government
debt consolidation loan exists.
Here's a wild thought: we need the same thing on a broader and more complex scale, allocating the embedded losses in our
financial system to their rightful recipients, wiping out common, preferred equity, and subordinated
debt as needed, and forcing the conversion of
debt claims to equity, delevering the system in a colossal way.
Last week, the Department of Education filed a
claim in federal court saying it would cancel
debt collection contracts previously offered to Windham Professionals Inc. and Performant
Financial Corp..
Of course, the amount and types of
financial claims against a firm are material to the ability of a firm to avoid defaulting on its
debts.
But I think that's appropriate — I'm evaluating
financial risk at this point, so I consider
debt service (& the banks) will always have first priority, rather than what set of shareholders have a
claim on what portion of EBITA.
Avoid brokers who make unrealistic promises about getting you out of
debt or who use advertisements
claiming they can help no matter how desperate your
financial situation is.
If there are many
debt claims, and firms with
debt finance other firms via
debt, who finance other firms via
debt, etc., then we set up a bunch of
financial dominoes, where a disturbance can knock one down and carry others with it.
Some would
claim that using the credit card could leave users deep into
debt which in turn deters them from achieving their
financial goals.
I think Jim's definition of
financial distress as too many dollars of
debt is unduly narrow and that it is only by using that definition can be
claim to debunk the relationship between fringe banking and
financial distress — primarily by arguing that because these are small dollar loans they can't really be much of a problem.
They
claim you can pay a lot less to settle your
debts, but
debt settlement programs don't always work as promised, and you may be left in a worse
financial situation than when you started.
Claiming bankruptcy in Ontario gives an individual with overwhelming
debts the opportunity for a fresh
financial start.
The telemarketer obtains information about the consumer's
debts and
financial condition and makes the sales pitch, often repeating the
claims made in the advertisements as well as making additional ones.
Debt relief firm that claimed ties to US government sued by CFPB — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sued two companies both known as FDAA for an allegedly illegal debt relief scheme targeting credit card debtors... (See Fake debt relief firm sued by C
Debt relief firm that
claimed ties to US government sued by CFPB — The Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau sued two companies both known as FDAA for an allegedly illegal
debt relief scheme targeting credit card debtors... (See Fake debt relief firm sued by C
debt relief scheme targeting credit card debtors... (See Fake
debt relief firm sued by C
debt relief firm sued by CFPB)
Mounting private
debt claims a portion of nominal economic growth for
debt service and therefore increased emissions that contributes only to the welfare of the credit issuers, mostly large
financial institutions or speculative traders and not to overall social welfare or, on average, net incomes of the borrowers.
However, the surrounding
financial crisis transformed what should have been a straightforward
debt claim into a jurisdictional stand - off.
Agents are responsible for your
financial responsibilities including investments, bank transactions, insurance,
claims and litigations, family obligations (child support, alimony or palimony, tuition), military retirement payments, social security payments, bills and
debt payments, and taxes.
As a member of Hinshaw's consumer
financial services group, Lueck will focus his practice on representing
financial institutions, loan servicers and
debt collectors in consumer finance litigation defense, with particular focus on mortgage and student loan - related
claims.
In 2010, George Osborne presented an austerity budget to the House of Commons
claiming that the country faced an economic crisis with an unsustainable public
debt, then at 64 % of GDP, and a huge deficit, and that this was the fault of the outgoing Labour government, which had caused the 2008
financial crash due to profligate public spending.
The
financial distress team deals with all aspects of capital and
debt restructuring, as well as corporate and individual insolvencies and associated
claims (such as voidable preferences and reckless and fraudulent trading).
Other areas of specialisation in which Keith continues to advise include professional negligence; contentious probate and trusts, such as contested wills, intestacies, and 1975 Act
claims;
financial mis - selling; contested insurance
claims;
debt recovery; and business and trade disputes.
Generally, parties to a
claim for child support, spousal support, or family property must provide a complete
Financial Statement that details all of their income, assets,
debts and liabilities.
Representing
financial institution in putative class action in bankruptcy court asserting discharge - injunction
claims related to charged - off, sold credit card
debts
Represented national
financial institutions and loan servicers in consumer - initiated cases involving allegations of wrongful nonjudicial foreclosure practices, fraud, unfair business practices and violations of the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act, as well as
claims arising out of Retail Installment Sale Contracts.
ULIPs — a common insurance plan sold by life insurers, where the money collected from consumers is invested into equity and
debt markets — have become a bone of contention between the two
financial regulators, with both
claiming regulatory authority over the scheme.
We never
claimed to be the cheapest, but you also don't take into account the investment options we offer as well as the
debt solutions and overall
Financial Need Analysis we do for families.