Sentences with phrase «financial reasons means»

«That a group of works that have remained together for 200 years should be split up for financial reasons means that any opportunity for scholars to see them has evaporated,» said Sir Nicholas Serota, the Tate's director.

In 2007 it started to alternate with Hockenheim as the location for the German GP but financial reasons mean it hasn't hosted a race since 2013, leaving Germany without a race in 2015 and 2017.

Not exact matches

Back in 2014, he wrote a Financial Times op - ed in which he criticized the virtual currency for being «unsuitable as a means of exchange» and said it was only attractive for two reasons: anonymity — as desired by money launderers and tax evaders — and speculation.

That doesn't mean he readily sacrifices his own financial well - being to benefit the farmers he purchases from; rather, Liu says he's upfront about market conditions and the reasons for demanding a certain price.

The reason is very simple: We don't have common stock on the market, which means the financial community and newspapers don't have a lot of interest.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

He's adored by fans, yet trust me, he doesn't give a rat's arse about that, and like I said earlier will do what's best for him, which obviously means for financial reasons.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

To what extent do you view your investing life as an extension of your personal life?By that I mean to what extent do the personal morals and ethical values of Tim the man govern the investing decisions of Tim the dividend growth investor?If you ask your typical dividend growth investor if they would be willing to invest in a lucrative but immoral venture, say selling child pornography or crack cocaine, the answer would probably be «absolutely not» regardless of the yield, valuation or growth prospects of the underlying venture.And yet, ask that same investor what their thoughts are about Phillip Morris and they would probably describe what a wonderful investment it is and go on about why you should own it.Do your personal morals ever come into play when buying companies, or do you compartmentalize your conscience, wall it off from the part of your brain that thinks about investments, and make your investing decisions based on the financial prospects of the company?The reason why I'm asking is that I keep identifying stocks of companies that I love from an investing perspective but despise on a human level.I can not in good conscience own any piece of Phillip Morris knowing the impact that smoking related illness has on the families of smokers.You might say that the smoker made his choice to smoke so you don't mind taking his money, but his children never made that choice and they are the ones who will suffer when he dies 20 years too soon.

There's a reason why Golden Financial Services has ZERO BBB complaints — it's because we make sure to help every consumer that contacts us, even if that means just giving them honest and free advice.

There are two other reasons that the CRE market and the CMBS tied to it didn't crash: 0 % interest rates, which means commercial borrowers weren't punished with higher interest payments; and more importantly Continue reading The One Shoe That Didn't Drop in The Financial Collapse - Commercial Mortgage - Backed Securities.

Strangely the vast majority of people are financial illiterate, (basically a pet peeve, the reason our primary education system is so poor is that the worst enemy of a politician is an educated voter, few politicians desire an educated consumer) and trust without verification, and sadly do not want to spend even sixteen hours per year investigating the numbers and what they actually mean, and compare them to the alternatives.

As rate shopper looking for a BC Home Equity Loans (this does not apply to Home Equity LOC's to 65 % LTV at a bank or financial institution) you are dealing with a product that means for one reason or another you do not qualify under conventional mortgage criteria.

At the Boomer & Echo blog, financial planner Marie Engen mentions my own preferred term Findependence and offers her take on it: «Financial independence means you have sufficient resources to give you the freedom of choice, to sustain a lifestyle that allows you to pursue whatever truly makes you happy — to leave a high stress job for a lower paying one that's more satisfying, take some time off for whatever reason, go back to school, or write a screenplafinancial planner Marie Engen mentions my own preferred term Findependence and offers her take on it: «Financial independence means you have sufficient resources to give you the freedom of choice, to sustain a lifestyle that allows you to pursue whatever truly makes you happy — to leave a high stress job for a lower paying one that's more satisfying, take some time off for whatever reason, go back to school, or write a screenplaFinancial independence means you have sufficient resources to give you the freedom of choice, to sustain a lifestyle that allows you to pursue whatever truly makes you happy — to leave a high stress job for a lower paying one that's more satisfying, take some time off for whatever reason, go back to school, or write a screenplay.»

The reason is that, from a financial standpoint, a long life means having to stretch your dollars over more years.

While some have the means to travel to other organizations, many of our applicants are unable to do so — for physical or financial reasons.

The GOOD news, and one of the reasons we love home exchange so much, is that there are no financial transactions between members, which means exchanging your home — with or without GuestPoints — would not technically fall under the short - term rental restrictions.

But everyone's financial situation is different, and if zero interest is your main reason for applying for this card, a hefty annual fee may mean that this isn't the right card for you, even with a zero - interest period.

The financial system has been overhauled, meaning there's no longer any reason to worry about repair costs for your vehicles, nor is there any entry fees for race events like there was on the console version.

This is not the best option for reasons that should be obvious, though it is sometimes the choice of attorneys who do not have the financial means to hire dedicated ethics defense counsel and have a friend or colleague willing to take on the matter pro bono.

In respect of the former, TPF provides a party with the means to pursue or defend a claim that it would otherwise be precluded from for financial reasons.

«related person» means, in respect of a designated assessment centre, an owner, partner or another person who has a financial interest in the designated assessment centre, but does not include a person who has a financial interest in the designated assessment centre by reason only of being a creditor who deals at arm's length with the designated assessment centre.

In his paper «Five Reasons Why Terms Like «Practice Support», «Knowledge Management» and «Financial Services» Miss the Point,» Alber noted few people in a law firm really know what these terms mean and suggested they imply a desire on the part of their respective departments to be left to operate in a void with little connection to the business of the firm.

One commenter said that no financial institution should have individually identifiable health information for any reason, and it said there were technological means for separating identity from information necessary for financial transactions.

The «strategically important», as I use it, means that there is either a financial tie to the country that justifies the investment, or there is a defensive reason for filing in that country, such as filing in countries where a business has no operations or market, but that may produce counterfeit goods or create a «copycat» business.

Car insurance is meant to provide consumers with financial protection should they be required to make a claim because of an accident or their vehicle has been damaged for several other reasons.

Let's take a look at a few reasons why you might be thinking about purchasing decreasing term life insurance coverage and explore how you can find solutions that won't mean less financial protection for your family.

While it is important to remember that there are no guarantees on what will happen to the price of Bitcoin or the future of cryptocurrency and that I, myself, and by no means any sort of financial guru, sometimes the facts are so clear, that it is hard not to just apply common sense and reason and draw a conclusion as to the success that all of these events must inherently bring.

Clearly people decide to cohabit for many reasons besides marriage (e.g., financial), and some even just «slide» into it, meaning that they gradually start living together out of convenience rather than because they are committed to each other.

This means that moving for financial reasons or to start a new job will be insufficient if the child does not directly benefit from the change.

Whatever the reason, it can mean serious changes in lifestyle and financial status.

These are distinct from financial motives, because when gambling is induced for financial reasons, it is probably the means of last resort to solve financial problems and goes along with a strong tendency toward the gambler's fallacy — in other words, ignorance.

Many relationships fail for this reason, in fact — people tend to see a relationship as an escape route from loneliness, as a way to heal or fix themselves, or even as a means of financial security.