Sentences with phrase «financial sense when»

Granted, you can't fall too far under market, but raising rent when then tenant moves of their own accord rather than automatically at every renewal can make financial sense when you run the numbers.

Solar loans make the most financial sense when the amount you pay on the loan is less than your monthly utility savings.

Only you can decide whether the additional cost of PMI makes financial sense when you buy a home.

Bridge loans make the best financial sense when home sales are brisk.

Not exact matches

So, when a company does reach a tipping point that it makes sense to approach investors to get a financial push, the investment is pretty attractive.

For shareholders, it made financial sense to get out of the industry a year ago, when mining stocks and coal prices were collapsing.

Shel Holtz, principal at Holtz Communication + Technology, thinks it makes no sense that when he tries to post independently verifiable information on to Wikipedia, such as audited financial statements, they are removed because he's a paid advocate.

For many young businesses, using another company's tech to build their products makes financial sense, particularly when resources are limited.

When one is Financial free, He / She can feel the sense of a new home any time and any where they want.

``... at a time when nest eggs are shrinking and Social Security looks less likely to cover basic expenses, living for less in a foreign locale can make good financial sense.

Understanding when it makes financial sense to finance that growth is a critical part of building a successful business.

To get a sense of what's at stake when you pull out of the market, even temporarily, during a bear market, the Schwab Center for Financial Research compared the returns from four hypothetical portfolios:

This is particularly true when determining when it might make financial sense to borrow to fund an expansion project or growth initiative.

Business owners have to make every dollar count, and managed services make more financial sense in the long run than «break - fix» vendors who respond only when technology fails.

The idea that imaginary financial insurance can provide capital safety is sheer invention; it makes no sense when held up to the light of fundamental analysis.

While there are financial upsides to waiting to claim your Social Security benefits, there are also times when this doesn't make sense.

Rather than hold onto outmoded ideas ideas like the Phillips Curve, which may have made sense when the US was a more insular economy, there are better ways to think of monetary policy from a structural standpoint of how financial firms work.

Financial firms seem to be doing a little of both, partnering when it makes sense and building it on their own in other instances.

Embrace the future and include the use of robo platforms when and where they make most sense from a total financial picture for all clients.

And if that's the case it makes little economic or ecological sense to spend billions of dollars building new fossil fuel infrastructure and increasing capacity, particularly when that infrastructure has a working life span and expected financial return that well exceeds thirty years.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Maybe not in a financial sense — pennants will always be great for the local, Ricketts - based economy — but a season like 2017 is a failure when it comes to that super-championship-team brand.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

That's the general sense I got speaking with budget experts and financial watchdogs when it comes to struggling local governments and whether there are any parallels between the Motor City's bankruptcy and the troubles facing upstate cities like Rochester, Syracuse and Utica.

That Agreement may take in elements of current Single Market arrangements in certain areas — on the export of cars and lorries for example, or the freedom to provide financial services across national borders — as it makes no sense to start again from scratch when Britain and the remaining Member States have adhered to the same rules for so many years.

Of course it makes perfect financial sense considering the install base of the 3DS when compared to the New 3DS in Japan.

The «Eleanor Rigby» star talks to TheWrap about the perplexing lack of great roles for women, even when it makes financial sense

The problem is that when these models fail to answer causal questions they do not answer anything at all and provide a false sense of reality of nowadays problems in financial markets.

And, in an age when many of our schools are overcrowded or crumbling, cyber learning makes financial sense, too, because schools using distance learning do not need to modernize or build new buildings in order to provide quality cyber instruction.

These meetings are intended to give CFOs and their counterparts in academics, HR, or other areas when it makes sense, an opportunity to wrestle with the most challenging issues district financial leaders must face.

While it's true that HBO content comes with a lot of quality production value (which they hope will help justify their premium price - tag), when we start purchasing channels a-la-carte in this manner, it needs to make financial sense — and while $ 15 isn't a lot, when you consider the library that comes along with the likes of Netflix or Hulu Plus for a lot less it becomes harder to justify the subscription.

In an era when financial records were kept by hand in ink, that might have made some sense; today, when computers account for money and it can be transferred electronically to authors» accounts, it makes none.

When that happens, they are going to trust the advice, which is mostly good common sense and time - tested, and take the first step into turning their financial lives around or make it even better.

Barnes & Noble hasn't released any estimates for the size of its year - end loss, but we'll get a better sense of how bad the damage is when it publishes its Q3 financial results on February 28th.

However, the consensus is that offset printing makes financial sense only when you're planning on doing a big print run — or when you absolutely must get your book printed in a size that no print - on - demand company offers.

You'll have an amazing sense of peace and security when you know there's a financial cushion to fall back on when you need it.

Often there are times when I don't need a massive stack of financial statements, insights into global operations or a tour of a manufacturing plant to get a sense within the first hour or two whether an investment is something that fits my style or requirements to own.

Online unsecured loans are advantageous for the borrower because there is a heightened sense of competition that is prevalent among the Internet financial sector, which means that lenders and lending institutions that do their business online often offer greatly reduced rates of interest for borrowers of all credit types when they choose to take out their unsecured loans via the Internet.

Even when I graduated from university (all seven years of it), I still had no sense of worry about my financial situation.

I agree these do not make much financial sense for people earning a steady income, but when I was starting out as a student with no income and only expenses, 60 days to pay off the microwave and fridge did make a difference.

I encourage Church leaders who have enough financial sense to be able to know when something financial «feels funny» to gather their elderly congregants, and tell them to call you if they are tempted by slick - talking salesmen to make them part with money.

By messing around with our money early in our adult life, we postpone the moment when we achieve a sense of financial security and some measure of financial freedom.

A traditional credit check might make sense when borrowing money that will take years to pay back, since your past history and financial stability are relevant under those circumstances.

The financial industry has promoted homeownership as the «American Dream,» and many of us have a sense of entitlement when it comes to owning a home; we see it as a true mark of success.

However, there is a decreased sense of security when you opt for variable rates because a sudden up rise in the rate may cause you financial instability and problems.

By pulling your own credit report and monitoring your credit score you will get a better sense of your financial circumstances and be able to make a more informed decision when applying for cards.

But are there circumstances when talking to a financial advisor can make sense?

My family was pretty well - off, but when my dad passed away when I was young, my mother — who had no financial sense — was left to manage the money.

Refinancing your home may make sense when your home equity and your financial circumstances will qualify you for additional credit.