Sentences with phrase «financial year in question»

Not exact matches

The hearing wrapped up about a half hour ago (you can watch it on C - SPAN), but Senators skeptical of his nomination questioned Gottlieb's close financial ties to the health care and biopharma industries, which have paid him millions in speaking and consulting fees over the years.
May's government also faced questions from the opposition Labour Party about why it awarded the company 1.3 billion pounds of state contracts after Carillion fell into financial difficulty in July last year.
But if working longer is out of the question, you can ease your transition by building at least a year's worth of living expenses in an emergency retirement savings fund, ideally in cash, says Celandra Deane - Bess, a wealth strategy director for PNC Financial Services Group.
The September financial results raise the question of what would have to happen over the remainder of the fiscal year in order to produce the November Update deficit forecast for 2012 - 13.
My question is, our financial adviser advised against contributing more than what my husband's company will match in his 401K because they only match $ 900 / year and the investment options are very basic — Bond (Fixed Income) or Large Cap (equities).
Also adding to the awkward questions for Facebook: Board member, Thiel, who supported Trump's presidential bid, made a $ 1M financial donation to a Trump - supporting Super PAC, called Make America Number 1, in 2016 — which Mashable reports subsequently paid Cambridge Analytica $ 231,352 toward the end of the same year, per an FEC filing.
Just started my job in July (22 years old) and of course I've been thinking about these questions being someone extremely conscious of my personal financial future.
A better question would be: why do so few of them know that startups have raised more than $ 220 million in the past three years through a new financial instrument that...
The consolidated statements in the Public Accounts present the final audited financial results and compares these to the Budget's forecasts for the year in question.
One approach to answering these questions is to look at the political party financial donations and lobbying efforts made by Kinder Morgan Canada in recent years.
whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
It's the fans that keep sacrificing because this team can't get their head out of their own ass... please give me some examples when a top club ever let their best player leave for free at the end of a season... Wenger needs to go to PSG and get some money and talent for Sanchez so that we can end this nonsense once and for all... then he needs to publicly apologize for the way in which they handled the whole situation... if they allow Sanchez to go for free there is no way this club, under the tutelage of Kroenke and Wenger, will ever layout the necessary coin to replace such a talented player, especially considering that Wenger will be a lame - duck manager once again in the final year of his contract and we know how well that went last year... open your eyes people, Wenger has spoken publicly about how he hopes that the next manager can take this club to the next level... WHAT?!?... he then went on to speak about leaving them in the perfect position to be successful, which is one of the reasons why several pundits felt Wenger would leave after last season based on the financials and the fact that so many players had only one year left on their respective contracts... who says this shit??? If you believe you're leaving things in the best possible shape for your potential successor to achieve greatness it raises a couple of serious questions: Why can't you take things to the next level if everything is as great as you say?
Now there is a question which opens a massive debate about how OUR club is run but the answer has got to be yes, I miss Highbury and to say I loved the clock end as a child through to leaving there for the grove as an adult is an understament, although the stadium has been a financial burden obviously it is still a wonderful place to watch football in, but football and especially Arsenal has changed so much in the last thirty years, I really am concerned about how much our supporters are charged either season tickets or match day sales including food / drink, we have removed a vast core of our traditional support and young because of these prices.
In her campaign, Templeton questioned the board's financial management and the revocation of privilege of the floor, which was prompted by public outbursts over the past several years.
When you combine the financial donations made by doctors and hospitals with the fact that every person in the state has a stake in health care delivery you can answer your question concerning health care cost increases going unchecked for a number of years.
When critically review this issue, there are several fundamental questions that emerge, bank of ghana has a supervisory department that is responsible for identifying every financial institution in operation, if the operations of these institutions were illegal as has been alleged, have they been operating all these years at the blind side of zbank of Ghana?.
In response to critics who questioned why former CEO of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Tsatsu Tsikata, is being paid his ex-gratia, 14 years after leaving office, he [Mr Tsikata] said fighting to gain his freedom from the «persecution» under the Kufuor administration in 2001, was far more important to him than pushing for his financial entitlements with the.In response to critics who questioned why former CEO of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Tsatsu Tsikata, is being paid his ex-gratia, 14 years after leaving office, he [Mr Tsikata] said fighting to gain his freedom from the «persecution» under the Kufuor administration in 2001, was far more important to him than pushing for his financial entitlements with the.in 2001, was far more important to him than pushing for his financial entitlements with the...
Question topics included financial incentives given by the City to Altronix (which hosted the Mayor for a visit just before the press conference), whether the mayor has concerns about offering such incentives, whether his jobs task force will work with local communities, whether his affordable housing plan conflicts with his plan to enable more manufacturing in the city, what a base livable minimum wage is, whether the mayor is concerned about the possibility that Republicans may control the U.S. Senate next year, whether NY State has done enough to assist NYC in obtaining hazard mitigation money from the federal government, the Mayor's views on items sold at the September 11th Museum gift shop and what the first «tangible» product of the task force will be.
In response to critics who questioned why former CEO of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Tsatsu Tsikata, is being paid his ex-gratia, 14 years after leaving office, he [Mr Tsikata] said fighting to gain his freedom from the «persecution» under the Kufuor administration in 2001, was far more important to him than pushing for his financial entitlements with the companIn response to critics who questioned why former CEO of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), Tsatsu Tsikata, is being paid his ex-gratia, 14 years after leaving office, he [Mr Tsikata] said fighting to gain his freedom from the «persecution» under the Kufuor administration in 2001, was far more important to him than pushing for his financial entitlements with the companin 2001, was far more important to him than pushing for his financial entitlements with the company.
The entire UK is in a financial crisis the kind of which we have not seen for years and it is even more serious for seniors who are the last group of people that anyone thinks of when money is in question, or anything else for that matter.
In fact, while the Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York poses the question of adequacy with characteristically New York bluntness and extravagance, many wonder if the case hasn't become a victim of those excesses and, during the 12 - year brawl over the merits of linking financial input with academic output, been overtaken by events.
In recent years, some state policymakers have begun to question their state's ability to continue to pay the financial incentives created to encourage teachers to undergo the arduous board - certification process.
In an open - ended question, Americans for the 15th consecutive year designated «lack of money / financial support» the biggest problem facing public schools.
Interested families should complete the Parent Financial Statement (PFS) which asks questions about the family's financial situation in order to make an assessment about what their contribution towards a private school education should be eFinancial Statement (PFS) which asks questions about the family's financial situation in order to make an assessment about what their contribution towards a private school education should be efinancial situation in order to make an assessment about what their contribution towards a private school education should be each year.
In all my years of financial reporting, I got wind of things in other areas of the company that I served that auditors should have questioneIn all my years of financial reporting, I got wind of things in other areas of the company that I served that auditors should have questionein other areas of the company that I served that auditors should have questioned.
The 45 - year - old human resources project manager from Burlington, Ont., was in the midst of a divorce and went to her advisor with pressing questions about her financial obligations.
Here are 4 key financial adviser questions to ask: 1) What do fees add up to in dollar terms each year?
The key questions are — how long do you plan to stay in the home, when do you want to pay off the mortgage or sell the property, what will your income look like in the next 3, 5 — 10 years — do you need better cash flow with lower payments or a workable repayment plan to pay off the mortgage sooner — knowing the borrower's short and long term plans and financial goals is necessary to make the best options avilable — the numbers of actual cost and benefits are the answer — show the total costs of principal and interest over 5 year periods and the total for keeping the loan for the full term, these are the real costs and savings for the borrower.
This year on Debt Free in 30 I'm devoting some of our shows to money questions that you don't hear answered a lot, but can have a big impact on your financial health.
In a question - and - answer session held after Nintendo's latest quarterly financial briefing, investors asked company executives to discuss potential issues they're facing now that the Switch is entering its second year on the market.
During the company's most recent financial earnings call with investors, president and CEO Owen Mahoney, answered a question about the Nexon's position in the console business in the years ahead following the «termination» of Cliff Bleszinski's LawBreakers earlier this year.
We expect that demand to continue during this fiscal year as well, so we will continue to sell the product,» Kimishima explained, in response to a question at the company's financial results briefing.
Notably, 1953 was also a pivotal year for de Kooning, who finally found staunch critical support and solid financial success following the exhibition of paintings and drawings from his Woman series at the Janis Gallery that spring.22 By then, Rauschenberg had known de Kooning for a year or more and had seen him on occasion, often through their mutual friend Jack Tworkov (1900 — 1982), who sublet studio space from de Kooning.23 Even as other details of the Erased de Kooning Drawing story changed, Rauschenberg always insisted that he chose de Kooning out of deep respect for his work and because there was no question that a drawing of his would be considered art — and this was more true than ever in 1953.24 Critic Leo Steinberg later reported asking Rauschenberg whether he would have erased a drawing by Rembrandt, to which he replied no.
So, I don't think the question is whether the legal industry will have a Fin - Tech moment, like the banking and financial services industry has experienced in recent years.
«One question lurking in all this is whether someone can come in and do to law what Amazon did to bookselling,» Professor Richard Susskind, co-author of The Future of the Professions, told the Financial Times last year.
With the price of oil shooting up and down this year and the instability of the financial world since their lordships» decision in July, one can question whether, commercially, the outcome of The Achilleas does reflect such parties» real expectations in unpredictable times and markets.
A question that our online insurance school often receives is how to figure out a health insurance policy's «out - of - pocket limit», or maximum financial limit that an insured must meet in a calendar year based on incurred medical expenses.
The ITR is mandatory to be filed by every single company, irrespective of whether or not any business transactions have been carried out in the financial year by the company in question.
Readers of this blog, and those who are familiar with life insurance, know what the contestability period is: a two - year time period after the issuance of a life insurance policy when the insurer can cancel or rescind the policy if the insured made what's called a «material misrepresentation» in the application, such as in response to a medical or financial question.
Also adding to the awkward questions for Facebook: Board member, Thiel, who supported Trump's presidential bid, made a $ 1M financial donation to a Trump - supporting Super PAC, called Make America Number 1, in 2016 — which Mashable reports subsequently paid Cambridge Analytica $ 231,352 toward the end of the same year, per an FEC filing.
The news about Model 3 production comes at a crucial time for the automaker, which has seen its steepest monthly drop in stocks in seven years amid questions about the company's financial future.
In the past year and a half, I worked as Interim Controller, taking care of financial statements, cash flow forecasts, budgeting, and etc., proposed year - end adjusting entries, and supervised staff members, answered clients» questions and making sure that things were going smoothly.
After years of working in the family courts, I realized that giving legal answers to these financial questions often didn't help alleviate the fear.
When questioned by people who think they were / are irresponsible bringing so many children into this world, especially in recent years with the state of the economy, the answer is always: they did this with a purpose, so that when they get old, and of course they will, they will spend a year living with each of their adult children, feeling money spent on raising them was better spent than investing in financial programs.
In a recent survey, «Bankrate.com» discovered that 25 % of the «Financial Security Index Survey» respondents answered «Real Estate» to the question: «Which would be the best way to invest money you wouldn't need for more than 10 years
In the U.S., the OECD says, only 9.4 percent of 15 - year - olds were able to answer the most difficult questions on an international test of financial knowledge and skills.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z