The English courts are known for their generosity towards
the financially weaker party, making it all the more important to have specialist legal representation from top divorce lawyers.
Once perceived as relevant only to
the financially weaker party in «bet the company» litigation, there are now countless examples of major corporations with strong balance sheets recognizing the benefits of using non-recourse litigation finance, structured either around a single claim or a litigation portfolio.
It is highly likely that England will be much more generous to
the financially weaker party.
The first and most important tool available to
the financially weaker party is that of court - ordered disclosure of relevant financial information and documentation.
If
a financially weaker party can, however, demonstrate that in England they fulfill the requirements of jurisdiction, they can expect far fairer treatment than elsewhere.»
The courts calculate maintenance payments based on
the financially weaker party's income needs and earning capacity, considering a range of factors such as their age, health, caring commitments and the length and living standard of their marriage.
London is known as the divorce capital of the world and is famous for big payouts to
financially weaker parties.
Not exact matches
Is it right that the
financially stronger
party will likely secure the better deal because the
weaker one can not afford on - going legal advice?