Not exact matches
Scott Milliman and I
found, after correcting for this and other
errors, that one of the key studies cited by the AFT as
alleging racial concentration in charter schools in fact
found charter schools no more segregated than district schools, with the notable exception of those charters that had converted from private schools.
None of the real or
alleged errors are in this book, since none of those contentious statements plucked from the thousands of pages appeared to be «main
findings» that needed to be discussed in a 250 - page summary.
These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless
error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for
alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither
found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.
At the Court of Appeal, UBC
alleged that the Tribunal had made several
errors of fact and law, including in refusing to consider modifications of the residency program as relevant to
finding that disability was a factor in Dr. Kelly's adverse treatment and in considering both the procedural and substantive elements of the duty to accommodate.
It is often the duty of this court, after having decided that a particular decision of the Circuit Court was erroneous, to examine into other
alleged errors and to correct them if they are
found to exist.
There was certainly nothing unreasonable about trial counsel's
alleged failure to call corroborating evidence on these issues when the proposed evidence did not relate to material issues but only to facts the trial judge accepted... In the result, we did not
find any
error in the reasoning of the trial judge and also
find that trial counsel did not act unreasonably by deciding not to call corroborating evidence on the issues of his relationship with Ms. Peters and physical condition as the evidence on these matters had already been accepted by the trial judge (at paras. 11 - 12).
The developer has meanwhile
found himself under fire lately from Bitcoin Unlimited proponents, notably Roger Ver, who released a dedicated presentation with quotes from Maxwell highlighting
alleged errors.