Sentences with phrase «find appealing in your case»

When trying to write your dating after 50 online profile, you will need to include some of the personal characteristics that you find appealing in your case.

Not exact matches

The Air Force Court of Appeals in May 2017 also reversed a conviction in the sexual assault case U.S. v. Boyce after finding that public statements by Sens. Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand regarding the «Marines United» scandal earlier this year created «the appearance of unlawful command influence» in the case, as retired Col. Don Christensen, a former Air Force chief prosecutor and current president of the advocacy group Protect Our Defenders, told Task & Purpose at the time.

The jury spent a total of just 14 hours in the penalty phase of the trial after finding Tsarnaev guilty on all 30 criminal counts, but an automatic appeal means his case will drag on.

Biotechnology entrepreneur William Ardrey faces a retrial on fraud charges after Western Australia's Court of Appeal found the jury had been misdirected in the original court case.

Nicola Sturgeon was speaking at First Ministers Questions after judges found in favour of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde which was appealing against a decision of the Court of Session in Edinburgh last year in the case of Mary Doogan and Connie Wood.

Would any of us respect the scientific findings in any field if they used emotional appeals to make their case, rather than evidence?

While the case was dismissed at first, the U.S. Court of Appeals later found in his favour, declaring «the image conveys a religious / ideological message».

According to Adamson, the case that Plotinus is the third most important thinker in western philosophy goes like this: «He fused together the doctrines he claimed to find in Plato with many of Aristotle's ideas, along with a healthy dose of Stoicism,» which was so appealing that it could be «embraced by pagans in the Roman Empire, by Christians in Byzantium and Western Europe, and Christians, Jews, and Muslims who lived in the Islamic Empire and wrote in Syriac, Arabic, Persian, and Hebrew.»

We find this appeal to Newman somewhat ironic since we showed in some detail why the cardinal's case for doctrinal development is deeply confused.

Time and again he rests his case against Hartshorne on appeals like the following: «In my personal, noninstantaneous direct experience, I do not find that I am a succession of units.

In its appeal to the Full Court, Prysmian argued that the trial judge erred in finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismisseIn its appeal to the Full Court, Prysmian argued that the trial judge erred in finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein finding that it had engaged in cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein cartel conduct in circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein circumstances where the ACCC's case against Nexans SA, another alleged participant in the conduct, had been dismissein the conduct, had been dismissed.

The ACCC has announced it will appeal the Air Cargo cartel decision; the case failed at first instance because the Court found there was no relevant «markt in Australia».

ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that the ACCC believed «that there was sufficient evidence for the Court to find that Cussons had entered into an understanding» and that the appeal will allow the Full Court to «consider whether the trial judge should have inferred an understanding involving Cussons based on the uncontested evidence in this case.»

All the findings of fact and conclusions of the Court of Appeals in that case are fully applicable to the present case.

While an appeal case will likely be launched in the event that Conte is found guilty, it is expected that this matter could rumble on for some time which would undoubtedly act as a disruption to his plans for the Azzurri in France this summer.

Take another ETS case, R (on the application of Ashfaq Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the tribunal found that the student accused of fraud by the Home Office was not entitled to an in - country right of appeal.

Giving the lead judgement, master of the rolls Lord Dyson found the rules governing the appeals process under fast - track were «systemically unfair and unjust» because «the time limits are so tight as to make it impossible for there to be a fair hearing of appeals in a significant number of cases».

As The Guardian has outlined, a recent analogue to this case was Fiona Jones, Labour MP for Newark, who was found guilty of fraud in 1999 — although her case was overturned on appeal.

In a series of cases called the Campaign for Fiscal Equality, which lasted from 1995 to 2006, the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals, found that the state was not providing enough money for New York City, leaving students without access to a «sound basic education.»

The BHA has made its comments in light of a new legal case launched by Tony Nicklinson which seeks clarity in the law on murder and assisted dying, and ahead of an appeal later today in the case of Frances Inglis, who was given a life sentence earlier this year after being found guilty of murder after giving her permanently brain - damaged son a lethal heroin overdose.

On the question of when Silver's motion to be given bail pending appeal will be heard, disgraced former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell has once again found his name being tossed around in corruption case involving a former high - profile New York elected official.

Although a judge initially ruled that Singh's words constituted an assertion of fact, which would have made it hard for him to win a trial case, in April 2010 an appeals court found that his statement qualified as «fair comment» and was therefore protected.

The start to cougar dating is to find the companion that most appeals to you as it is more of mutual understanding that matters in this case.

In case you found someone appealing, but you are too afraid to commence communication without knowing that the attraction is mutual, Spark.com lends you a hand with its unique feature, called Secret Admirer.

The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) has provided some recent case law on reasonable foreseeability in Hadlow v Peterborough City Council (2011), where it was found against the council.

Since then, a high - profile court battle ensued, resulting in a Superior Court judge finding that the program violates the state's constitutional mandate to use public funds only for public schools — but thanks to a Court of Appeals ruling last month, the state must disburse school vouchers that have already been awarded while the case winds its way through the state appellate courts.

«The Court of Appeals finding properly acknowledges that the school district's responsibility under the IDEA is not to cure or remediate all effects of a child's disability, but to serve students with a demonstrated «need» for special education and related services in order to benefit from his or her education,» said NSBA Associate Executive Director and General Counsel Francisco M. Negrón, Jr. «Given that the student in this case is academically successful, it may be more appropriate to address non-educational concerns through other accommodations.»

(2) In all other cases, the contractor may appeal the sanction or corrective action through the DOT Research and Technology Coordinating Council (RTCC) to the Deputy Secretary of Transportation, in writing within 30 calendar days after receiving written notification of the research misconduct finding and associated administrative action (sIn all other cases, the contractor may appeal the sanction or corrective action through the DOT Research and Technology Coordinating Council (RTCC) to the Deputy Secretary of Transportation, in writing within 30 calendar days after receiving written notification of the research misconduct finding and associated administrative action (sin writing within 30 calendar days after receiving written notification of the research misconduct finding and associated administrative action (s).

Booksellers can react by hand - selling to customers and making themselves relevant as Ravenbooks has (I am increasingly sure of finding a pile of relevant books there every time I walk in) and no doubt this will mean concentrating on older books, out - of - print books and second - hand books, books that appeal directly to the customer, and print - on - demand books printed directly on site (though I am less convinced of the economic case for this).

-- # 1: Skype or similar (with Facetime & tc)-- Great Apps... really great apps — Augmented Reality — More really amazing Apps like «What's Up» (see it if you haven't)-- Things you can only do on the Playbook (multitasking based apps, real time apps, security apps, video DJs, face recognition)-- MindManager as native (subsidise it, if needed — BBs and Playbook appeal to this market)-- Find on Page / Find in Document / etc. — Categories for photos — Improved File System access and Search — Include a docket for your choice of deluxe case (keep a good profile)-- Hardware acceleration for secure sockets — Properly communicate the Enterprise value of current Bridge.

My reading of the trial documents makes me think that the judge in the appeals case would be hard pressed to find a justification for reducing the settlement; what would the new settlement amount be based on?

Other cases, such as In re Hornsby out of the United States 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, have reversed findings of undue hardship, and instead called for partial discharge of student loan debt, where the debtor's monthly disposable income was less than $ 200 after expenses.

But let's say that the idea of a roguelike does appeal to you as a player, in which case Battlezone VR may indeed find its audience on PS VR.

But while some indie games can appeal to a broad audience, a lot of them are niches within a niche, and in those cases it's all the more important to find a way in the trailer to say to that niche: «I see you, and I understand what you like.»

IN a closely watched copyright case with broad implications for the contemporary - art world, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday decided largely in favor of the artist Richard Prince, who was found by a federal court in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and paintingIN a closely watched copyright case with broad implications for the contemporary - art world, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday decided largely in favor of the artist Richard Prince, who was found by a federal court in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and paintingin favor of the artist Richard Prince, who was found by a federal court in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and paintingin 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and paintings.

For example, in the recent Liden v Burton [2016] EWCA Civ 275, [2016] Fam Law 687 (proprietary estoppel: see next article) Hamblen LJ characterised the issues on appeal as: «(i) whether the judge wrongly applied the law to the facts as found; (ii) whether the judge erred in the exercise of his discretion in giving effect to the equity» in the particular case.

replete with such language: it disdains the district court's «abrupt handling» of Appellant's first case; sarcastically refers to Appellant's previous counsel's «new - found appreciation for defendant's mental abilities;» criticizes the district court's «oblique language» on an issue unrelated to this appeal; states that the district court opinion in Jones «revealed a crabby and complaining reaction to Project Exile;» insinuates that the district court's concerns «require -LSB--RSB- a belief in the absurd that is similar in kind to embracing paranormal conspiracy theories;» and accuses Appellant of being a «charlatan» and «exploit [ing] his identity as an African - American.»

«More often than not, the court of appeal and the trial courts say that they can correct what the Crown has done wrong by instructing the jury, and I must say I find that unsatisfactory in most cases,» Lockyer says.

The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five appeals this week, including three criminal cases involving driving «over 80» and production of evidence; an unjust enrichment claim; and an appeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault viappeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault viAppeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault victims.

I took a few days off last week and was disappointed to return and find that the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had issued a decision barring the webcasting of a hearing in a recording industry file - sharing case pending in federal court in Boston.

on Interesting Example of the Long Shadow of the SCC's Findings in a «Summary» NOC Case on the Court of Appeal's Upholding of Sanofi's Plavix Patent

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.

However, the case was appealed and while the appeal court ultimately decided that the separation agreement was void as against public policy, it also noted that courts needed to use caution in finding contracts to be void as contrary to public policy so that the doctrine does not «unduly impinge on the basic right to enforce engagements freely and voluntarily made.»

But in this case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit found that the employee didn't meet this standard because the customer never touched or actually threatened the employee.

In all three cases the Appeal Court found that no orders for costs should be made against the parties said to have acted unreasonably.

The Virginia Court of Appeals found there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in denying husband's request for a continuance or denying his motion to reopen the case.

In this recent Alberta case, upheld on appeal, the plaintiff was videoed in both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthfuIn this recent Alberta case, upheld on appeal, the plaintiff was videoed in both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthfuin both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthful.

The Court of Appeal found that all four elements required to prove a claim for civil fraud were established in this case.

In the final analysis, the Court of Appeal found that in this case, delay was attributable to both partieIn the final analysis, the Court of Appeal found that in this case, delay was attributable to both partiein this case, delay was attributable to both parties.

And as the four cases and their commentary point out, it is very difficult to find a basis in the law on which a Master can set aside or change a procedurally unfair RTDRS order, especially when no appeal has been filed.