Sentences with phrase «find arguments about»

I find his arguments about lags to be particularly important as we sort out the solar - climate effects.

That said there were concerns that probably still need to be fully addressed, however, I find arguments about what matters and what does nt matter to be tedious and when time permits the goal is to address every concern or give people the tools to attack the work by using the very code we deliver

It is no surprise then, that this is where we find arguments about catastrophic climate change bury themselves — in uncertainty and ambiguity.

In a good number of internet discussions, you will find arguments about the use or non-use of EVOO in cooking that focus on the issue of smoke point.

Such over-egged warnings have cost the PM credibility, and weakened better - founded arguments about how Brexit would hit the economy.

I find the argument about being «chosen» for service but not for salvation possible, but not compelling.

There are those who just like to argue; if they couldn't find an argument about climate change they'd find some other subject.

Not exact matches

Now, you may or may not find that to be a persuasive argument about the state of income inequality in Canada — as our own Chris MacDonald has pointed out, determining the fairness of CEO pay is more complicated than it seems.

«Change your argument to find compromise, and document your case if you're passionate about your perspective.

CATA found support for its views in the arguments presented in the Mowat Centre study and C.D. Howe commentary about the importance of rebalancing the indirect tax based mechanism to better achieve successful commercialization in Canada.

You know, I find that argument, that if you're not paying that somehow we can't care about you, to be extremely glib.

You'll find exactly the same kinds of arguments about racial integration in the armed forces that you're hearing now about gays in the miltary.

With more than a hint of exasperation, Scalia concludes: «One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument over these distinctions; and will find in our society's tradition regarding abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved.

Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins at conception, or over the proper structure of the family.

Actually, my favorite of hers, which unfortunately I can no longer find the link to, was something about the argument tactics of conservatives: That we like to overwhelm our opponents with... what was it?

Here's the penultimate paragraph: Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins at....

Thus Martin concludes, for example, that N. T. Wright's approach to Jesus, which mixes supernaturalism and ordinary biography, is just as historically valid as Sanders's method, which does not deal with miracles or the resurrection — although, paradoxically Martin finds Wright's arguments about the resurrection very unconvincing.

@Scot That you found other scripture that contradicts the passages I cited just goes to show that the Bible is such a gargantuan collection of contradictions and adsurdities that it can be used to bolster just about any argument.

I can tell that Dan is anxious, and I find myself conducting little arguments about the age of the earth in my head.

But it's not so much an argument of how «we» as Christians chooses to structure our regular meetings or find comfort in them, it's more about the perception those meetings elicit in both believers and those outside the body.

The argument is really about what precisely is the «intelligence» we find in Nature, and how it organises matter into a creative economy of inter-related entities.

Though this schema remains, in much reduced form, in the present volume, Hopewell found the central image, the body, unsatisfactory as a conveyance for his essentially structuralist arguments about congregational narrative.

I just find it funny that people of science find every opportunity to jump on the anti-Faith argument without doing any studies or research about it.

I personally find his argument fresh, trenchant, and interesting, and I look forward to hearing more about his «many - layered self.»

A developed argument about American exceptionalism and the nature of the American Founding would take us a long way toward understanding why we don't want religion to be pushed from the shared mainstream over to one side's shore.

If the article above was written by a grown adult about the existence of Santa Claus, and if that argument was essentially based on asserting Santa Claus» existence based on faith and the popularity of the Santa Claus myth, then anyone would be justified in scorning those beliefs, especially when that argument extends to declaring that recent findings confirm the existence of Santa (after all, children are still receiving Christmas gifts).

I find it interesting that the three people who responded to me all brought up an argument about Muslims when I didn't even mention Muslims.

I will here only state my belief that it will be found that the primitive kerygma arises directly out of the teaching of Jesus about the Kingdom of God and all that hangs upon it; but that it does only partial justice to the range and depth of His teaching, and needs the Pauline and Johannine interpretations before it fully rises to the height of the great argument.

There are even sharper arguments about the Unification Church, which was founded by the Korean Sun Myung (b. 1920), who is known as Reverend Moon.

One of the arguments that the «Christian nationalists» always make is that the country was founded on Christian principles, when in fact many of the founders held beliefs that were about as far from any Christian orthodoxy as you could safely be back in those days.

Any student of history or literature knows that all the arguments used to defend the genocidal slaughter of one's enemies are the exact same arguments we find in the Bible about why the Israelites went to war with the Canaanites.

A more detailed assessment of current scholarly argument about the resurrection may be found in Appendix B.

My new table of 16 (or 32) options in thinking conceptually about God yields an argument for just one of the 32 options so strong that I find it reasonable to hope that metaphysics and physics will between them find a way to solve the problems Griffin outlines with characteristic ability.

I hope you don't find it insulting when I say that as is your arguments often require us to accept without any reason that the way you understand some verses is correct yet you can dismiss any verse you chose by saying that their understanding is a «misapplication», perhaps supplying a reasonable approach to how one goes about interpreting Scripture in general could clear up that problem.

That's what I find funny about the argument.

The alleged «silence» about the virgin birth from other New Testament authors can not be used as an argument against it since its factuality would have been revealed by Mary only after the resurrection and it did not constitute the centre of the Easter message; Redford even finds hints thatother New Testament authors framed their affirmations to allow for the virgin birth.

I found myself in a debate about this the other day, and the gentleman I was talking to fell back on the argument that it was the Church's job to take care of the poor, not the government's.

The evidence for this argument [38] can be found in Cull of the Wild: A Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States [39](hereafter COTW) and Facts about Furs [40](hereafter, FAF).

This intellectual formation works against the metaphysical foundations of natural law reasoning, and therefore most people find the arguments remote and unconvincing — «academic» in the bad sense of being about something other than the real world we live in.

I do find it pretty funny, I've seen it creep into a lot of his arguments about christianity is right.

The greatest outcry, however, came from survey organizations who produce the polls, social scientists who utilize poll findings to bolster arguments about the vitality of American religion, and a number of Roman Catholic researchers who argued that we exaggerated the overreporting in their constituency.

Raison's Filter Fiber © (joking about the copyright)-- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

steve, specifically, what do you find compelling about Jaime's argument?

And while I appreciate the pastor's sentiments about God being found in the kindness and compassion of many people after the shootings, he falls back on Man as an exceptional creation of God as an argument for why these evil events happen.

There is some argument about this; some researchers believe that all reactions come from trace contamination in the oats, while others have found evidence that a small percentage of people also have sensitivity to oats.

@laninja, do nt get my last post wrong mate i am not defending that it was embarrasing and keane, as captain, should hav been a man and told the ref he made a mistake, but the way he grabbed the ball amidst the georgians complaining to the ref smacks of everything i hav been complaining about this week, but listen does that mean the other 15 squad members should suffer because keane lacks as much integrity as henry?i hav been surprised how easy lads hav found it to favour the french in this argument....

, basically busted that argument wide open, and my interview with Cyma Shapiro about «Nurture: Stories of New Midlife Mothers,» her traveling photo and essay exhibit of mothers aged 41 to 65, indicates more and more women are finding ways to work around the age - fertility issue, happily.

Juliana F.W. Cohen, ScD, ScM, the study's lead author, concludes: «Our findings suggest that concerns about school revenues or participation in meals programs are not strong arguments for rolling back USDA's healthier meal and snack standards.»

I found it extremely useful when my sons were about seven to ten, and it saved many big arguments.

Personalities play that function - if John Prescott and Paddy Ashdown are taking diametrically opposed views of the issue on the TV news, you may well already have an underlying view about whose arguments you will find persuasive.