Sentences with phrase «find arguments against»

Because you can very well accept that climate change exists and still find arguments against climate action because the costs of doing something are so great.

Furthermore, you have compounded your sin by actually putting a lie into the mouths of innocents («after carefully examining the question of timing of emissions reductions, we find the arguments against postponement to be more compelling»).

But those who fall into ignorance or denial of one or the other of these truths will find our arguments against abortion to be absurd.

Newman recounts his realization of this principle in the Apologia: «It was difficult... to find arguments against the Tridentine Fathers, which did not tell against the Fathers of Chalcedon; difficult to condemn the Popes of the sixteenth century, without condemning the Popes of the fifth.»

Mr Johnson said he found arguments against Mr McKinnon's extradition «amazing» and stressed to the committee that extradition did not equate to a guilty sentence.

Add on the great mileage and competitive sticker price, and I'm finding arguments against the RAV4 hard to come by.

I know that many people won't find this argument against dollar - cost averaging very persuasive.

By Steve Dale You won't find an argument against walking.

It should cause George to stop, not to turn around and shout at his own team, screaming, «you've got the science wrong, idiots», but instead to attempt to understand why he once found the arguments against nuclear so compelling.

Climate Change will likely greatly re shape the world, largely against our interests, and particularly (ironically because «helping the poor» has suddenly become the new and somewhat ill founded argument against Climate Change redress the poorer people of the world.

Skychain finds arguments against its competitors, claiming to be the only Future - Proof Blockchain Project for the Healthcare Industry through a viable data marketplace.

Not exact matches

The main arguments raised against mandatory paid leave are generally that it's expensive, and also that even if employers don't have to pay the salaries of their on - leave employees themselves, it's still a burden to find someone to fill in while the employee is out.

Past CPC voters again overwhelmingly side with Alberta and against B.C., while past Liberals are divided and past New Democrats find British Columbia's argument more persuasive.

I find it fascinating that everyone is fixated on the «3rd world country» term and nobody seems have any objection to the rest of that statement... that is other than to say that I am delusional... no hard, factual arguments against it.

The late Isaac Asimov presented the best argument against it I've yet found, and I'll post it here.

If you can't articulate an argument against ID any better than that, please find something else to do.

I find it highly entertaining, although depressing, that Intelligent Design folks try to discredit evolutionary theories with fanciful strawman arguments because they really don't know what they're against.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

One may, however, find insights in the Bible that provide public arguments against the idea and show that thinking more continuous with Christian teaching is better.

One argument which has been attempted against its historicity has been that there are ancient accounts of floods to be found among other peoples; however, rather than discounting the reality of the Flood I view this as corroborative.

Arguments against gay marriage are theologically fraught, and Christians and Jews who try to mount biblically or theologically based arguments will find themselves ignored or denounced by secular gatekeepers precisely because they offer biblically and theologically based aArguments against gay marriage are theologically fraught, and Christians and Jews who try to mount biblically or theologically based arguments will find themselves ignored or denounced by secular gatekeepers precisely because they offer biblically and theologically based aarguments will find themselves ignored or denounced by secular gatekeepers precisely because they offer biblically and theologically based argumentsarguments.

One argument against the Null Hypothesis concerning God, but not limited to, can be that Elementary Subatomic Particles, aka Quarks, can never be observed nor can they be found in singularity / isolation, yet they can be detected by what they make up, that is Composite Subatomic Particles, aka Hadrons.

Does not Peirce's argument for the improbability of an exact zero of a property found in highly variable degrees, and in highly variable extents of space, hold against the exact truth of Euclidian geometry?

I find that I can make a more compelling argument against the pledge of allegiance if I base that argument on political beliefs as opposed to my religious beliefs.

Also, if idealism means the doctrine that mind in various forms and manifestations is all we can possibly know, then I am one of many around the world who find no cogent argument against this.

When our identity is tied up in a certain politician, we find it hard to hear any kind of argument against that politician's words.

Nor do I find any other cogent arguments in Hartshorne against the attributes of the second group, though I will not be able to argue this last point in detail.

I find it interesting that one of the main argument of atheist against God is that they are for free will.

What do we find in his arguments against Celsus, instead?

Those who turn to these criticisms hoping for a firm argument against abortion and Hartshorne's support of it will not quite find what they seek.

Which is to say that I do not find Hartshorne's and Ogden's arguments against this persuasive.

The alleged «silence» about the virgin birth from other New Testament authors can not be used as an argument against it since its factuality would have been revealed by Mary only after the resurrection and it did not constitute the centre of the Easter message; Redford even finds hints thatother New Testament authors framed their affirmations to allow for the virgin birth.

Oddly enough, in The Principle of Relativity, where one expects a rigorous treatment of such topics, one does not find Whitehead's own definition of simultaneity or even an argument against Einstein's.

«As an argument against this way of thinking, this kind of idolatry, I turn to the work of Walter Brueggemann, who, in an interview last year with Krista Tippett for On Being, explained the reason for the abundance of metaphors we find for God in the scriptures this way: «The Biblical defense against idolatry is plural metaphors.

Against the rationalistic arguments of his brethren, Emerson bid the young students turn within and find the divine at work in their own lives.

Is it found in the arguments for or against free sexual expression of consenting adults, prison reform, government surveillance of people's lives, and civil disobedience?

For the record, this in no way is an argument against gay marriage and as an atheist I find it ridiculous that this is actually a big debate we're having in our country, let alone that there is just an incredible amount of opposition.

This intellectual formation works against the metaphysical foundations of natural law reasoning, and therefore most people find the arguments remote and unconvincing — «academic» in the bad sense of being about something other than the real world we live in.

There is, however, another argument against the death penalty which I find compelling — that based on the imperfection of judicial procedure.

And if you want some more arguments for and against the house church, here is funny chart I found: Enjoy!

Various parts or implications of this position are also finding their way into a variety of pastor - oriented journals, as can be seen in Cobb's arguments against free trade in Theology and Public Policy, [5] his exchanges with Dennis P. McCann in The Christian Century over NAFTA, [6] and his debates with Robin Klay in Perspectives over GATT.

«Lightly», perhaps not, but the arguments against its authenticity are, in fact, by no means light, as we have found on further investigation.

@Sunny You'll find more arguments against Christians here becuase Christianity is the dominany religion in the United States.

Therefore, I find the internal inconsistency and self - contradiction of many arguments against genetically modified organisms (GMOs) simply astounding.

While there are some arguments against eating white rice, I find that it's a nice comfort food, and when it's served with veggies there is enough fiber to make up for that which is missing.

According to the police report obtained by Yahoo! Sports, Chapman's girlfriend alleged that after an argument over an item found on Chapman's phone, he pushed her against a wall and put his hands around her neck.

However, parents will also find some very persuasive arguments against the practice of co-sleeping, including the American Academy of Pediatricians (AAP).

For example, it is now not uncommon to see a Russian on the Internet to atribute to NATO - member countries characteristics found in Russia (I've seen arguments against «NATO - propaganda» and such).

He put the government arguments against the comparability of other country's detention systems under a lot of scrutiny and found them lacking, not least of all because the government has conducted no research on the subject.

Yes, there is an argument for increasing capacity, but as the NAO found, long distance inter-city journeys for the business elite (and MPs of course) is not where any rational person would chuck at least # 50 billion to start the fight against crush - hour conditions.