You will, however,
find conflicting opinions on various foods that appear in the food pyramid and also on exactly how much you should eat from each food group to achieve optimal health.
So searching the Internet, I've
found some conflicting opinions, with an occasional person saying either that cold leak down tests are completely invalid, or that cold numbers will be two to three times warm numbers.
Not exact matches
The point is, you'll
find many
conflicting opinions when it comes to the amount of cash you should have to open an apparel store, but we won't get into any trouble by saying the more money you have, the better off you'll be.
By asking enough economists or investment managers you will
find as many different
opinions on the subject as would care to, no doubt many of them
conflicting.
The aspect of science that bears on this is not one scientists
opinion, its the body of scientific
findings that
conflict with many religious beliefs (Especially Christianity and Islam).
Although there are numerous
conflicting opinions on the issue of breastfeeding during pregnancy, no research has ever
found an increased risk of miscarriage in women who continue breastfeeding an older child during pregnancy.
The method is the subject of intense debate, passionate
opinions and
conflicting research
findings.
Canadians are
finding it hard to get a clear picture of where the housing market is headed, with all the
conflicting «expert
opinion».
I had
found that in the midst of
conflicting views in the media and on the net I had only one option: To learn the science as well as I could and form my own
opinion.
«I
found the testimony just full of internally
conflicting facts and
opinions.»
Yet the fierce politicization of the climate change problem raises questions as to whether public
opinion has been shaped more by partisan
conflict than by an understanding, or a lack thereof, of the scientific
findings per se.
Finding that
conflicting decisions within the 2nd Circuit had left the Rule 23 standard unsettled there, the
opinion conducted an in - depth review of case law on the issue, including Sotomayor's Visa Check case.
The judge pointed out that the duty of an expert is to «provide
opinion evidence that is fair, objective and non-partisan,» while adding, «I do not have any faith in the conclusions reached by [the cousin] and
find that he is indeed in a
conflict position.»
When patients make claims of negligence the process of discovering whether negligence occurred requires investigating medical records, interviewing the involved parties (through sworn depositions),
finding experts, sorting out
conflicts between the
opinions of experts, reinvestigating the records and testimony as new insights are uncovered and then reaching some kind of consensus, if possible, about what actually occurred and whether those facts meet the definition of legal negligence.
1) we agree to disagree:) 2) supremacy of EU law for the EU system is the equivalent of the hard core of constitutional values that some national Courts defend against EU (and ECHR)- it is not a matter of «legitimacy» or «patriotism» but of using a «lower rank» instrument (accession treaty) to interfere with a treaty rule: the identical issue is for States who have a «rigid» constitution (alike the Treaty binds the CIEU): the accession treaty to ECHR or EU has a «lower rank» than the Constitution itself, so that the national Constitutional Court can not accept it can derogate to a higher ranking rule - usually they will
find a way to reconcile the «construction» of the two set of rules, but if they are requested of an
opinion on the point of principle, they will always say that in the very end, if all other paths have been explored to avoid the
conflict, eventually it is the Constitution and neither ECHR nor EUwhich prevails.
If you're anything like I was when trying to decide upon your first professional job you may
find yourself overwhelmed by all the different career paths you could take, not to mention confused by the
conflicting opinions of friends, family, teachers and university lecturers.
We
found this to be an excellent guide for those with the capacity and the desire to make
conflicts and differences of
opinions move towards a more constructive and mutually benefiting end.
In my
opinion RECO should have two things, and two things only, in its sights, and they are these: 1) Severely limiting the number of newbie entrants onto the playing field via enforcing strict standards to be met prior to registration, and: 2) Increasing the number of registrants being permanently shown the door upon displayed proof of incompetence and / or malicious malpractice, not just by way of researching complaints from consumers, but by way of never - ending random spot checks / audits and follow - up calls designed to reach out to and
find consumers (and registrants) who have had recent negative experiences with registrants which point to registrant - centric
conflict - of - interest behind - the - scenes behaviour.