Sentences with phrase «find much argument»

Not exact matches

Today, these arguments are even more applicable, and one can find junior gold and silver mining companies that are much better bets than their larger cap peers.

I've found that atheists and especially atheists here regurgitate arguments put forth by Dawkins and Hitchens et al. as much as any Christian quotes the Bible.

With more than a hint of exasperation, Scalia concludes: «One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument over these distinctions; and will find in our society's tradition regarding abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved.

But it's not so much an argument of how «we» as Christians chooses to structure our regular meetings or find comfort in them, it's more about the perception those meetings elicit in both believers and those outside the body.

Though this schema remains, in much reduced form, in the present volume, Hopewell found the central image, the body, unsatisfactory as a conveyance for his essentially structuralist arguments about congregational narrative.

But Duffy never wanders too far from this one persistent argument» that much of the vitality and resiliency of Catholicism is found in its rituals and worship, in lay devotions and Marian piety, in veneration of the Church's blesseds and saints, in acts of communal discipline and obedience that bind the faithful together as a living organism.

I have found myself strongly drawn to the arguments of Austin Ruse (who has written here, here, and here at Crisis), and not very much to those of Ron Belgau or Elizabeth Scalia here at FT.. But how to put it?

Christians will find this aspect of the book especially challenging and, in general, there is much to disagree with in Goodman's argument by both Christians and Jews.

Here's my latest list — this seems like a good spot to set this down, as nobody's posting much on this thread... ---- bad letter combinations / words to avoid if you want to post that wonderful argument: Many, if not most are buried within other words, but I am not shooting for the perfect list, so use your imagination and add any words I have missed as a comment (no one has done this yet)-- I found some but forgot to write them down.

The dominant image of the local church, the one that gives Reed's and Evans's findings much of their coherence and argument, is that of the congregation as a mechanistic field of traceable forces.

While there's still much learning to be done, I have found the light in teh grace of Jesus Go out and do real research if you're truly intersted in learning and gaining knowledge, posting stupid arguments on these boards accomplishes nothing and only shows people's willful ignorance.

In developing this argument I shall (1) take a close look at the notion of religious pluralism, finding it to mean much more than mere multiplicity of groups defined by ecclesiastical characteristics; (2) look at the historical form taken by pluralism in American society as a set of pressures to which responses were required; and (3) identify the «religiousness» of the response made by legal institutions.

So your argument in all this is «why should we pay so much for a QB when The Redskins think they found a better option elsewhere (In ALEX SMITH).

@laninja, do nt get my last post wrong mate i am not defending that it was embarrasing and keane, as captain, should hav been a man and told the ref he made a mistake, but the way he grabbed the ball amidst the georgians complaining to the ref smacks of everything i hav been complaining about this week, but listen does that mean the other 15 squad members should suffer because keane lacks as much integrity as henry?i hav been surprised how easy lads hav found it to favour the french in this argument....

«The much - touted «biblical argument» in support of corporal punishment is founded upon proof - texting a few isolated passages from Proverbs.

«I don't know if there is much point in asking a scientist what arguments a politician will find compelling.

While I agree with much of what you said about the benefits of intense «burst» exercise, I find the anti running and anti aerobics arguments promoted by these «experts» to be horribly inflexible, dogmatic, and, unlike what you suggested, totally UN reasonable.

From one key argument, the characters begin saying and doing far too much for the simple purpose of finding as clear - cut a resolution as possible.

The storyline is one farfetched contrivance after another, starting off with the mix up at one of the better hotels in Vegas, whose staff are too incompetent and easily swayed by the weakest of arguments to believe that they could ever find a job, much less retain one.

I played Mario Party 5 and I found it quite enjoyable, much more than Mario Party 4, So did my friends, though we did have some arguments sometimes on which Mario Party to play.

After all the talk of 2009 being «the year of the woman,» owing much to the number of female directors who found themselves in the mix (and inevitably leading to Kathryn Bigelow's history - making moment at the Kodak), I'm sensing an even better argument for 2010 as a singular season for the fairer sex.

As Murphy summarizes their argument, Niemi and Junn «found that, although the civics curriculum had much less effect on civic knowledge and values than did the home environment, civics courses did make some difference....

If readers are looking for a detailed description of those reforms or an argument about why they, and not other factors, are responsible for success in Massachusetts, they won't find much in this memoir.

No matter how much you try, you will always be susceptible to specific scientific arguments contradicting well - established findings.

i personally find the mainstream scientific consensus» arguments MUCH more convincing than the «skeptic» arguments.

I do really think that the arguments must be found from what is going to happen much faster.

That's why I kept the argument in the top post above simple — limited to addressing only Jelbring and the EEJ paper so we could do adiabatic apples to apples reasoning, limited to a picture that even people who don't know much physics can understand — anybody who has tried to touch the handle of a heating pan and found it hot to the touch has direct experience of Fourier's Law, so whether or not they fully understand the algebra they know this happens — and appealing to their intuition as much as to the letter of the various forms of the second law (there are at least four or five that I know of offhand).

The moralising stridency of so many arguments for cap - and - trade, carbon taxes, and global emissions treaties was founded on the idea that there is a consensus about how much warming there would be if carbon emissions continue on trend.

At a recent debate at Oxford University, organized by the OU Engineering Society, I gave the undergraduates an argument from process engineering (which you will find in outline in my Union College presentation, and in more detail in my Hartford College lecture) to the effect that the closed - loop temperature - feedback gain in the climate system (i.e., the product of the Planck parameter and the net sum of all unamplified feedbacks) can not much exceed 0.1, implying at most 1.3 K of warming per CO2 doubling, compared with the IPCC's central estimate of 3.3 K.

I find this entire uproar strikingly similar to the long - running argument about dinosaur antecedants; particularly the Clemson view of dinosaurs as descended from the «cursorial crocs» as opposed to pretty much everyone else's view (now) that birds derive from coelurosaurs.

I guess I'd add that this is understandable, given that the denier camp really doesn't have much actual science to use as ammunition or to build their arguments on, and thus they tend to wage their campaign by cherrypicking data, or seeking to attack narrow and often out - of - context passages found in scientific papers or in simplified postings about those papers found on sites like Skeptical Science.

In 2015, a group of scientists within NOAA re-examined the world's long - term measured surface temperature data and found reasons to adjust... There has been much argument about the validity of the adjustments (9)

Pielke has a more defensible argument — «'' Thirty years is not an appropriate length of time for a climate analysis, much less finding causal factors like climate change,» — and he's bright enough to cherry pick data sets with a lot of noise and statistically infrequent occurrences that do require more than 30 years (look!

I find that participants very much like the fact that I have been a QC for some 19 years, working on all types of leading business / finance cases and that they consider that this experience is invaluable both in terms of my suitability for appointment as a mediator (because the participants in business / finance cases prefer a mediator experienced in these areas), and in terms of facilitating a settlement in the mediation; because, although a mediator does not advise the participants, nevertheless, with their agreement, I can «stress test» the strengths of their arguments.

On that issue, Nordheimer found «the concern over the submission about the chill on zealous advocacy loses much of its impact if the reality is that this zealous advocacy is being used to further arguments in cases where the facts would not, on an objectively reasonable basis, warrant the ultimate relief sought.»

1 For attempts to measure the effect of advocacy quality through other means, see, e.g., Banks Miller et al., Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability, 49 Law & Soc» y Rev. 209 (2015)(finding that high quality representation evened the odds for asylum applicants and that asylum seekers fared better when unrepresented than when represented by a poor lawyer); Mitchell J. Frank & Dr. Osvaldo F. Morera, Professionalism and Advocacy at Trial — Real Jurors Speak in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(finding statistically significant correlations in criminal cases between jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury verdict, and finding statistically significant correlations in civil cases between perceptions of defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make?

UPDATE: Though I am finding the transcripts a bit more frustrating than enlightening, but I did very much enjoy seeing Jeff Green in the Gall argument talk about the reasonableness of a sentencing judge looking to a «legal database, for example, or even a blog or something like that.»

As might be expected neither of these arguments found much favour with their lordships.

I find it interesting that in assessing similarities and differences, the court hears argument as to particular features and puts itself in the position of the «informed user» to make the judgment, much, I suppose, as it would when the standard is the «reasonable person.»

However, on this many can argument as few can like and few won't find it that much useful.

Learn How to Stop Arguing (A step - by - step guide) None of us want to be fighting with our loved ones, yet it doesn't take much to find ourselves immersed in an argument we...

The client who can look back and see that his or her lawyer was truly committed to finding solutions is going to be much more satisfied than the one who spent long hours waiting in court, was forced to endure adversarial and contentious arguments and suffered through the months or even years of litigation while having little control over the process.

The psych literature arguments of Michael Lamb and others, such as Richard Warshak, Joan Kelly, et al. to the effect that babies can form multiple attachments — and with a leap of unsupported logic hypothesize this to mean that overnight visitation and joint custody for babies is not harmful (although no scientific findings so much as hint that it's beneficial)-- has not addressed the relative strengths of those multiple attachments, or the actual effects of such visitation, and primarily focuses on what is possible in terms of paternal caregiving and roles in the context of intact homes, not nonresident visitation or joint custody reality.