But the court did
find substantive errors by the trial judge which warranted its reversing findings against two doctors, a nurse and the hospital.
Not exact matches
As I have already stated, my work has already been scrutinized by my peers, and no
substantive errors have been
found.
I am happy that you have confirmed the «1994»
errors I
found in your two papers, and I am also happy that they are typographical, rather than
substantive.
At the Court of Appeal, UBC alleged that the Tribunal had made several
errors of fact and law, including in refusing to consider modifications of the residency program as relevant to
finding that disability was a factor in Dr. Kelly's adverse treatment and in considering both the procedural and
substantive elements of the duty to accommodate.
Most recently, in R v Oakes, 2016 ABCA 90, the case that is my topic here, the majority ruling of Justices Myra Bielby and Frederica Schutz, at para. 11, adopted the opinion in R v Truscott (2007), 225 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont CA) where a unanimous five member panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal stated, at para. 110, that the power to overturn a conviction
founded in a miscarriage of justice, ``... can reach virtually any kind of
error that renders the trial unfair in a procedural or
substantive way.»