Although I am aware of the often - repeated statement that personal rights are more important than property rights, where the owner has stored his
valuables representing his life's accumulations, his livelihood business, his tools and implements, and his
treasured antiques as appears in the case at bar, and where the evidence is sufficient to sustain a
finding that the installation was intended only as a warning to ward off thieves and criminals, I can see no compelling reason why the use of such a device alone would create liability as a matter of law.