Sentences with phrase «finding of alarmism»

Mosher Since virtually all funding for climate science comes from the state, and is thus precommitted to a finding of alarmism, your recommendation for a fecund scepticism is.....?

Not exact matches

Of course some alarmism - addicted readers will insist that we ignore these findings, and blindly accept the alarmist scenarios.
Although the provisions of Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy technically shield the city from being forced to sell any asset, a mixture of alarmism and rational fear of a populist campaign — to find revenue wherever possible to pay pensioners and other creditors — has led a wide array of observers to wonder how much money, exactly, could be squeezed out of the encyclopedic museum's vast holdings.
I find it interesting that at that time the projections were for more warming than later iterations of the IPPC... but the alarmism during the same period has increased.
I find it interesting that a particular organization might be indicted for supposedly being funded by the fossil fuel industry when so many organizations and studies fueling the global warming alarmism are funded by governments and not suprisingly endorse MORE government (in the form of regulations, regulatory agencies, taxes, fees, etc...) as a supposed «solution» to the problem.
Though I am concerned and devoted to the cause of reducing plastic pollution in the ocean I find the distortion and alarmism of advocacy groups in this arena disturbing.
Somewhat ironically, it has been my finding, as someone currently in the thick of the business world, located in the US, that the business world is perhaps almost as much a boiling cauldron of AGW alarmism as are academia, government and the NGO world.
Most of the government and media interest is in making sure that climate alarmism rules and that findings that contradict alarmism get debunked, by hook or by crook.
Today's Neo-Malthusians (e.g., Neil Young, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., David Suzuki, Al Gore, and Bill McKibben) made up their minds decades ago on the climate question and have spent decades advancing a largely ideologically founded campaign to limit growth via the mechanism of environmental alarmism.
For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) might have played this important role, but its leadership was quickly captured by political operatives, determined to support climate alarmism, even when this was at odds with the findings of honest scientists who wrote technical parts of IPCC reports.
Incidentally, is it just me or does it seem telling that Richard Betts needs to go back 6 years to find an example of «alarmism» in the mainstream media?
Based on the official university whitewashes of Climategate thus far in support of such corruption of science for political ends, the odds must be that they will surely find something, somewhere to pin on Wegman, to punish him for failing to validate the Hockey Stick, the poster child of alarmism.
Yet these sensible and moderate findings will be met with a predictable wall of alarmism.
All they are pointing out is that the Liberal / Democrats generally support climate alarmism and its proposed IPCC - style solutions of central control to reduce CO2 emissions,, and the Conservative / Republican / Libertarians support a more skeptical viewpoint and non-governmental solutions if problem are found to be real.
Al Gore thinks he might just have found the holy grail of climate change alarmism: a peer - reviewed study «proving» that carbon dioxide actually makes you stupid.
IMO Max is one of the few commenters on this blog who is genuinely seeking to find common ground, and while we all know that he is rationally sceptical of AGW alarmism he deserves more respect that was accorded to him by VP on this occasion.
The fallacious alarmism surrounding the Emperor Penguins «imminent extinction» can be found in one of Miesler's link to the Center of Biological Diversity.
I do find the extreme alarmism in some of my liberal friends and some others, but not any kind of majority.
If applied to the climate issue, there is no doubt that would mean the end of the Obama EPA's attempt to implement climate alarmism in the US and hopefully the EPA CO2 Endangerment Finding.
I find these charges of «alarmism» by right - leaning pundits and «cherry picking» by conservatives like, Roger Pielke Jr., as little more than pejorative labelling.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z