The SDAB
finds against the Applicants without providing written reasons.
Not exact matches
The small business can also contact local attorneys to
find out about liens, claims, or actions pending
against the
applicant, and can hire independent accountants to verify financial information.
The federal courts
found the Grand Street projects themselves, run by Silver allies, discriminated
against black and Latino
applicants in a suit that named Ralph Lippman, the father of the chief judge, as a defendant.
The PPP took the case to court seeking «an order directed
against the 1st respondent in her capacity as returning officer for presidential elections to grant the
applicant the opportunity to amend and alter the one anomaly
found in his nomination papers as well as accept his nomination papers as amended or altered to enable him contest as a presidential candidate for the 7th December 2016 elections.»
Consequent to the above directives, we
find it necessary and expedient to make a further order to stay all court proceedings pending in the various High Courts
against the
applicant by some of the disqualified presidential candidates on the same issue of having been denied a hearing to enable the EC to carry out its mandate in line with these orders.
The Gotham Gazette reports that a federal judge yesterday appointed a monitor to oversee the Fire Department's hiring practices, which were
found to discriminate
against black and Hispanic
applicants.
While it is reasonable to extrapolate the
findings to other urban students who are similar to New York City
applicants, we would argue
against these results being applied to students who differ substantially from
applicants to the charter schools.
Study of Fairfax County schools
finds discrimination
against black teacher
applicants washingtonpost.com/local/educatio...
Reputable lenders are interested in protecting themselves
against scams too, and so usually look to
find out about their
applicants by checking their financial backgrounds.
(1) The
applicant or the responsible officer of the
applicant is of good moral character; (2) An inspection has been made of the premises and a
finding is made that it conforms to this bill and is a suitable place in which to conduct the commercial breeder's business; (3) The commercial breeder has a valid sales tax registration number and is in good standing with the Tennessee department of revenue; and (4) The licensee has never been convicted of any criminal offense
against an animal.
This case relates to whether a solicitor acting for an
applicant can be
found personally liable to pay the costs of the respondent following the court's refusal to grant an application to issue a witness summons
against the respondent.
In conclusion, in the absence of a prevailing community interest being put forward by the Italian Government,
against which to balance the
applicants» momentous interests as identified above, and in the light of domestic courts» conclusions on the matter which remained unheeded, the Court
finds that the Italian Government have overstepped their margin of appreciation and failed to fulfil their positive obligation to ensure that the
applicants have available a specific legal framework providing for the recognition and protection of their same - sex unions.
[2] In a prior decision, 2012 HRTO 350 (CanLII), 2012 HRTO 350 («decision on liability»), I
found that the respondent discriminated
against the
applicant because of disability contrary to ss.
[41] The
Applicant's section 7 challenge uses the 1995 Firearms Act as a baseline
against which to measure the licensing and registration system under the Act, and
finds the latter lacking.
In
finding that the
applicant had not been discriminated
against on the basis of sex or family status the Honourable Justice Johanne Trudel directed her attention to the four factors necessary to establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of family status.
However, these cases involved situations either where the
applicants left their employment because of the sexual harassment they were experiencing (or were reprised
against) and such leaving was
found to be tantamount to dismissal, as a result of which the damages were increased.
In its reasons for decision on liability, the Tribunal
found that the employer had discriminated
against the
applicant on the basis of a disability for nearly nine years (from April 2003 until the Tribunal's decision in February 2012.)
The Respondent made several submissions
against awarding damages, but the court
found attempts to shift responsibility for the error to the
Applicant «offensive.»
When a company contemplates taking adverse action
against an employee or
applicant based on information
found in a background check, the subject of the check has a right to a copy of the report.
And a person trying to
find housing after a period of incarceration is unlikely to succeed unless he or she is also able to
find employment, a task that may prove difficult due to the common practice of potential employers discriminating
against applicants who have criminal records.