The finite age of the universe also solves Olbers's paradox, even if we lived in a static universe.
Not exact matches
The
age of innumerably multiplied Cosmos seems to me to be dependent upon the physicality rates within cosmologic equilibriums in universalisms
of finite dependencies giving births to evermore cosmologic
universes and also multiple chasms
of varying Cosmos plural.
The key point is that the paradox shows that the
universe must be
finite in
age, size, or both (assuming the
universe is uniformly full
of stars).
Two things to note, perhaps: his sensible skepticism — he is, after all, a theoretical physicist, not an experimentalist; and his summation
of the possible benefit: «We'd be able to do computations in a
finite time that would take longer than the
age of the
universe now.»