Save for one exception, the District of Columbia is the only jurisdiction in the U.S. that under very limited circumstances actually permits ownership or management of a law
firm by nonlawyers.
Not exact matches
Money is too powerful and the
nonlawyer string pullers would demand financial coverage, not just for our current costs of (a) overhead, (b) income to the lawyer, and, if you are in a
firm large enough to be subject to billing targets set
by management / compensation committees, (c) return to the partners, but also (D) profits to the string pullers.
This notion of a niche offering
by nonlawyer service providers for otherwise pro se clients provides opportunities for LLLTs and
firms to leverage the unique offering because the LLLT does not need to be supervised like a paralegal.
Note About Terminology: A variety of terms are used to refer to organizations that are owned and / or managed
by one or more
nonlawyers and / or that are multidisciplinary practices (in other words, to refer to legal service providers that are not the traditional structures of either sole practitioner or law
firm partnership).
The Rule does not permit a
nonlawyer to start a law
firm by hiring a couple of associates.
Washington, however, does not ban
firms owned
by nonlawyers.
(6) the lawyer partners in the
firm make reasonable efforts to establish that each
nonlawyer with a financial interest in the
firm is of good character, supported
by evidence of the
nonlawyer's integrity and professionalism in the practice of his or her profession, trade or occupation, and maintain records of such inquiry and its results; and
Does it — could it — also encompass structures, be they companies or other types of organizations, that are owned in whole or in part
by nonlawyers, and that provide legal services outside the limited contexts of existing companies like the ones listed above, but in «nontraditional» manner such that it could be difficult to describe the structure as a traditional «law
firm»?
[3] However, D.C.'s rule is narrowly tailored to allow equity ownership only
by those
nonlawyer partners who actively assist the
firm's lawyers in providing legal services, and does not allow for the sale of ownership shares to mere passive
nonlawyer investors.
The U.K. had a similar rule barring
nonlawyer ownership, but under reforms implemented
by the Legal Services Act of 2007 law
firms have been able to take on a limited number of non-lawyer partners and lawyers have been allowed to enter into a wide variety of business relationships with non-lawyers and non-lawyer owned businesses.
To date, the greatest advances in legal operations have occurred in legal departments, yet the same inventive methods and mindsets are cropping up in traditional law
firms and sophisticated «New Law» companies funded
by nonlawyer investors.
The Chicago - based group is led
by a board that includes academics, law
firm partners, corporate counsel, government attorneys, and
nonlawyers, and it receives financial support from law
firms, corporations, bar associations, and individuals.
Lawyers in most places are not permitted to share fees with
nonlawyers, practice in
firms owned
by both lawyers and
nonlawyers, use
nonlawyers to feed business to lawyers, or list unlicensed
nonlawyers as legal practitioners on stationery or advertising.