Sentences with phrase «first big question»

We'll have more to go on when the game is announced next week, but the first big question is if Funcom themselves are developing the game?

«This answered the first big question of how opening of the envelope trimer is triggered,» Dr. Blanchard says.

«That's our first big question about super-Earths,» says MIT's Berta - Thompson.

Taking up the first big question» «Is mediocrity a good idea?

The first big question that you need to ask yourself is why is the company having a secondary offering?

Not exact matches

Lately, I've found that even the mission - critical business ideas that make it through my first set of filters have to address another elephant in the room: the question of whether this startup is building something that's going to become a free - standing and independent business or whether it's developing a great feature that is going to be swallowed up, ripped off, or rolled over by one of the big guys in their space in the near future.

-- The biggest first question is will you build it yourself or are you going to hire someone?

Based on what you stated in the first question, what do you want to have made big, positive changes to?

«I think it's [been] two and a half years since I have joined [Facebook], and I think the biggest change I've seen in this period is that Facebook is [now] a mobile - first company, without question,» she says.

But the revelation this week that Mr. Thiel was covertly backing Mr. Bollea's case as well as others has raised a series of new questions about the First Amendment as well as about the role of big money in the court system — specifically the emerging field of litigation finance, in which third parties like hedge funds and investment firms pay for other people's lawsuits.

[42:14] Tony explains the questions to ask an advisor, to ensure they're truly on your side [42:28] 60 % of people surveyed today say they believe their financial advisor is putting the company interests above their own — it's actually worse than they believe [42:45] Why Tony has chosen to support Peter and his firm, Creative Planning [43:33] How you can get a second opinion from Peter's firm, Creative Planning, through their website (www.GetASecondOpinion.com)-- it doesn't matter how much or little you have, they'll give you feedback [44:00] Tony's biggest challenge when writing his first book, and how it brought him to Peter Mallouk [44:30] Peter explains the process Creative Planning went through to open their services to people at the $ 100,000 level, and how offering this extensive range of services to people at this level is unprecedented

The first one has been a big question since the raid.

In his first public Q&A, Mark Zuckerberg addressed the big question: why is Facebook Organic Page Reach decreasing?

Many people had small, very early bets on the company but the question was whether I was going to take the first big bet.

But the biggest question - why the Autopilot steered into the barrier in the first place - remains unaddressed.

Starting with the first question, the most common response is to blame Washington, namely concerns around trade and the potential for increased regulation of the big tech companies.

Itâ $ ™ s the kind of budget a New Democrat could love, and indeed in the first Question Period following Liberal Finance Minister Bill Morneauâ $ ™ s presentation of his big - spending, green -, child -, labou...

But the big question remains: Which use case will first bring about bitcoin's wider acknowledgement?

In this fund administration special, we bring together five top tech experts to answer the big technology questions facing private equity firms; look at the administrative strain GPs are under; consider the implications of Brexit for UK fund managers; explain how the outsourcing model is changing; consider the challenges faced by CFOs; explore the issues involved in raising a first credit vehicle; plus much more.

And, big question is can we build a great product, which is localized to India first with a very strong network, and then look at monetizing the user base.

First of all, it's beyond time to reintroduce the big questions into our classrooms: Who are we?

B) If you've ever watched even the most simple programs on cable TV regarding the Big Bang, the scientists are the first ones to admit that these are questions they can't answer... yet.

This unalterable and eternal despot is the origin of totalitarianism, and represents the first cringing human attempt to refer all difficult questions to the smoking and forbidding altar of a Big Brother.»

First off, let me say that asking the Big Question, worrying with some consistency about the meaning of life and final ends is only for certain kinds of people.

Physics professor and frequent First Things contributor Stephen Barr discusses the implications of quantum physics at Big Questions Online:

So, the bigger question remains... why would anyone want to exclude these two ordinances from our lives in the first place?

First, with regard to the question about the poor, the author is suggesting that these candidates make a big deal of their Christian beliefs, yet seem not to care at all about «the poor.»

Physics professor and frequent First Things contributor Stephen Barr discusses the implications of quantum physics at Big Questions Online: No less a figure than Eugene Wigner, a Nobel Prize winner in physics, claimed that materialism — at least with regard to the human mind — is....

Why is being big often the first question in ours?

Solve for us the question of the reasonableness of athiesm, where you get something (big bang) from nothing — there must be a first cause of everything; explain implications of the anthropic principle and the wildly unprobablistic likelihood that our universe could even form in such a fashion as to be capable of sustaining life (which has, interestingly, your athiest heavy hitters (i.e. Dawkins, Schwartz, etc.) necessarily positing multiple universe theories to get around the near probablistic impossibility of all conditions be present at time of big bang for life to be possible without acknowledgement of a divine designing hand guiding the process); explain The probablistic impossibility of non-irreducibly complex basic cells (life) coming together spontaneously (DNA, cell membrane, etc), even the most basic, simple forms of life allowing for reproduction, metabolism, etc...

Science is still looking for the first cause and there it is the bigest question of science of all time solved.

A bigger question we might be asking ourselves is: why there is a hexane limit in our foods in the first place?

The big question is why Coca - Cola Amatil didn't bite the bullet earlier, when signs first emerged that the challenges in the beverage market were structural rather than cyclical.

The big question is, though, can Arsenal take advantage of their problems and get a first win on the board before the international break?

The offensive line still has a big question mark at LG but I think that will be addressed in the Draft (I would like to see a first round pick at the position if the quality is there).

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

«First he has not come in straight to a big club, he had an intermediate stay in Europe so the adaptation is less of a question mark.

You don't get it do you?Its not about the mistake Ospina made, every goalkeeper made mistakes.The question is why do you rest your first choice keeper for the biggest competition in Europe in a must win game.And if you are not going to play one of the best keeper, a keeper who has a lot of experience in Europe, then what is the use of signing him in the first place?I did not hear a lot of people criticizing Ospina for the mistake rather all the fans, pundits are criticizing Wenegr for the choice he made.

He'll probably get the start for the Colts against the Detroit Lions in the first week of preseason, but the bigger question is whether Tolzien will be the one leading the Colts on Sept. 10 against the Los Angeles Rams.

I very much doubt that Real would pursue Sanchez unless they were contemplating moving Bale, planning to play Ronaldo centrally this season and willing to upset their delicate wage structure... of course anything is possible, but this appears to be unlikely... the bigger question is the fact that Wenger was willing to risk losing the first few games of the season because he hasn't settled the Sanchez dilemma in a timely fashion... no one believes he was too injured to play so this is not too dissimilar from the Liverpool game last season, except for the fact that Sanchez was in street clothes and not in his warm - ups (much like Coutinho for Liverpool today)... we're existing in such a fragile environment because of Wenger and Kroenke... in the game yesterday, when Leicester scored to make it 3 - 2, you could cut the tension with a knife... can you imagine just for a second what the reaction might have been if we had failed to score in the last 10 minutes

The Big 12 was the toughest league in America, the Jayhawks didn't have a projected first round NBA draft pick on the roster and front court depth was a major question mark after the departure of McDonald's All - American freshman Billy Preston.

The Big Question is if a Team that Carry First 1st, 2nd and 4TH could Buy Players what is the Excuse of a team that come 3rd..............

As for th first goalscorer, the big question is whether Wenger will pick Giroud or Walcott to lead the attack, and will Sanchez be back on the left as he gets back to full fitness.

Biggest Question: Can Nebraska win first down?

Big question marks over which youngsters may potentially be good enough for fringe roles in the first team... Gnabry, Afobe, Silva (killing it!)

Their success on offense this season has raised questions in the run - first Big Ten, where coaches have to ask whether they need to make similar adaptations to avoid getting blown away (Michigan is the exception this year, but the Wolverines lose a lot on defense next year).

Now back to full fitness, Marseille are hoping that he will feature more regularly in the first team, but the bigger question remains as to whether he will still be at the club long term.

Rooney's departure from the first - team lineup doesn't just deprive us of our biggest question, it deprives the England team of their obvious England Captain, in the iconic, face of the nation, institutional sense.

Weve no gear change in regards dictating tempo and upping our intensity, the approach and first 40 mins of the everton game leaves big questions to be answered from the management team as to where was the motivation and will to win after the previous days results went our way.