During the four months from then until the CJC's Justice Neil Wittmann issued
the first decision on the matter (on January 5, 2011), there was extensive media commentary on the story, especially by the CBC.
Not exact matches
But whereas
on all previous occasions the Israelis were united, this is the
first life - or - death
decision that has disenfranchised half the population (give or take 10 or 20 percent - who
on so grave a
matter is counting?)
First when making
decisions on medical care and treatment of women (or anyone else for that
matter) it is best to «executive order thinking» instead of «this feels right to me.»
Turning to the
first matter, while economics correspondents like Robert Peston are feted and given prime slots, they are only ever reporting
on the effects of economic
decisions made by institutions and individuals.
At its
first session, in 2012, the ADP adopted the agenda, as set out in document FCCC / ADP / 2012 / 2, paragraph 13, initiating work under two workstreams: workstream 1
on matters related to paragraphs 2 to 6 of
decision 1 / CP.17 (agenda item 3 (a)-RRB- and workstream 2
on matters related to paragraphs 7 and 8 of the same
decision (agenda item 3 (b)-RRB-.
The COP / MOP, at its
first session, adopted the
decision on this
matter as 5 / CMP.1.
The COP / MOP, at its
first session, adopted the
decision on this
matter (6 / CMP.1).
Criteria for cases of failure to submit information relating to GHG estimates of LULUCF activities under the Kyoto Protocol The SBSTA, at its twenty - third session, developed criteria for cases of failure to submit information relating to estimates of greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from activities under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Kyoto Protocol, similar to those described in paragraph 3 of
decision 15 / CMP.1, and recommended a
decision on this
matter for adoption by COP / MOP at its
first session (see FCCC / SBSTA / 2005 / L. 18 / Add.1).
rulings
on oil shale were «misplaced», but ultimately Salazar still has said that he wants to make his own
decisions on the
matter with the
first six months of the Obama presidency.
The
first important
matter was that this was not an appeal from any decided case, but from a
decision on the interpretation of whether something could be a criminal offence under section 92 of the Trade Marks Act 1994.
If, however, the court finds that the current dispute is fundamentally distinct from all previous cases (called a «
matter of
first impression»), and legislative statutes are either silent or ambiguous
on the question, judges have the authority and duty to resolve the issue (one party or the other has to win, and
on disagreements of law, judges make that
decision).5 The court states an opinion that gives reasons for the
decision, and those reasons agglomerate with past
decisions as precedent to bind future judges and litigants.
While Canadian courts have repeatedly expressed reluctance to embrace Sullivan - style changes regarding actual malice, 175 three
matters must be stressed:
first, this proposal is markedly different from Sullivan and does not conflict with the reasons for which the SCC disparaged Sullivan; second, the public figure concept itself predates the Sullivan
decision as a defence applicable in infringement of privacy cases and so can be relied
on without being dragged into the vortex of debate over the advisability of Sullivan and its progeny; and third, Canadian defamation law already recognizes that certain plaintiffs require different treatment vis - à - vis the remedies available to them, 176 which can be construed as a latent foundation for acceptance of the public figure concept.
In August 2015, the
matter was specifically allocated to another judge and her
first task was to conduct a fact finding hearing, it being obvious that the allegations made by the mother would have a strong effect
on the welfare
decisions depending upon any findings.
The court reversed the appeal court
decision and upheld the
first instance court
on the ground that the subject
matter was different: one in the
matter of trademark infringement and the other was in relation to the copyright.
Whilst we will not take positions
on tax
matters that may create reputational risk or jeopardise our good standing with tax authorities, we are however prepared to litigate where we disagree with a ruling or
decision of a tax authority, having always
first sought to resolve any disputed
matters through active and transparent discussion.
a) the respondent was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; b) the respondent has submitted to the jurisdiction either expressly or by defending
on the merits of the case without objecting to the jurisdiction at the
first available opportunity; c) the creditor was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; d) the child for whom maintenance was ordered was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted, provided that the respondent has lived with the child in that State or has resided in that State and provided support for the child there; e) except in disputes relating to maintenance obligations in respect of children, there has been agreement to the jurisdiction in writing by the parties; or f) the
decision was made by an authority exercising jurisdiction
on a
matter of personal status or parental responsibility, unless that jurisdiction was based solely
on the nationality of one of the parties.
Mr. Azar's pro bono work has also included successfully persuading the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to allow a disabled prisoner's federal civil rights case to proceed, resulting in a published
decision on a
matter of
first impression; assisting tenants in disputes with their landlords; and assisting a translator in defending against contempt proceedings relating to her alleged whistleblowing about safety defects in automobiles.
The Court's
decision in California State Teachers» Retirement System v. Alvarez — a suit brought
on behalf of Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. — refused to adopt the Delaware Court of Chancery's recommendation that, as a
matter of federal due process, a judgment in one derivative action should not bind the corporation or its stockholders in another derivative action unless either (i) the
first action has survived a motion to dismiss because a pre-suit demand
on the corporation's board of directors would have been futile or (ii) the board has given the plaintiff authority to proceed
on the corporation's behalf by declining to oppose the derivative suit.
At least, such a reading finds support in the public reception of some orders for a preliminary reference: The
first reference of the Federal Constitutional Court to the ECJ in the OMT - ruling was predominantly depicted in the media as if the Court shrunk from making its own
decision and left the last word
on this
matter to the ECJ.
Although getting coverage for your vehicle is sometimes a time - sensitive
matter, you should try to ease into the
decision making process instead of jumping
on the
first good offer that you see.
An FDA spokesperson tells The New York Times that the proposals do not reflect a
decision on the ultimate safety of e-cigarettes; these regulations are a
first step to bring the market under the administration's purview, and further rulings
on matters such as flavoring are likely to follow.
4 DOS APP 02
Matter of DOS v. Hecht - business practices; commissions; broker's past acts can not be used against him as evidence of repeated misconduct
on a charge of illegal business practices where such conduct is being now
first reviewed for untrustworthiness; charging fees in excess of professional norms, absent a showing of unique services offered above and beyond those services normally rendered by a real estate broker, demonstrates untrustworthiness; broker's current commission rates are far in excess of rates established by custom and usage; ALJ's
decision modified, license suspended until one month after broker refunds amount in excess of rates established by custom and usage