The inflection point in the Arctic sea ice (
first graph above) is between 1940 and 1960, well before the start of the modern satellite record.
Sustained high speeds have the most dramatic effect on driving range, as
the first graph above clearly shows.
The X axis on
the first graph above is time and the original of that reflected weeks 0 - 8 weeks in Dr Taylor's 8 week trial (s).
Not exact matches
As seen in the
graph above, consumer default rates are below their pre-crisis rates, with the
first mortgage and composite rates around those last witnessed in late 2006, and the second mortgage rates are near their eight - year historic low.
There's another category of scalability -
first projects that is even earlier and less proven than the projects listed
above that seek to achieve consensus via mechanisms that lie outside the construct of a blockchain (gossip protocols, directed acyclic
graphs, etc).
The
first of these is the
graph above illustrating the cuts of over 150 Special Education staff positions (from Matt DeFour's report on the new MMSD Middle School Mental Health initiative).
As the
above graph shows, 10/20 was the
first time my «Paid Units» cracked 5 in one day over the last 3 months, except during a cute little 99c promo I ran at the end of August.
Our
first graph looks at this blue - chip dividend paying stalwart for the period calendar year 1995 to current that correlates to our S&P 500 example
above.
The
first 10 years in the
graph above is a good example.
Whenever the green
graph is
above the orange one, like in the example
above, you simply just have to stop micro-managing your trades and believe in yoru
first analysis and let price do its thing.
In the Edgewonk screenshot, we split the trade management
graph into two parts; in the
first part, the green
graph is
above the orange one which means that the potential performance is greater than the actual performance.
The 4500 - years temperature
graph that Spann cited as the truth, is the distorted one in the
first link
above.
And secondly, though the
first graph in the article
above is only for six years, at no point the difference comes even close to that of May.
Look at the data for 1987 in the
first graph produced by SteveMc
above, how can you say the upward trend was well established in 1987?
Since the IPCC's
graph above up to 2003 shows that most of the energy from global warming is in the oceans, to a
first approximation, Ocean Heat Content change since then is going to be close enough to the Total Heat Content change.
As suggested in the
above graph (which the reader is very encouraged to click on and click to enlarge if it does not display full size at
first):
Here's the next
graph, this is the corrected min temp average for
above same data, with the same range as outlined from the
first graph on top of min temp.
A question;
above the
first graph is referred to as SOD 1.5.
If you travel the
above path, it shows that in the
first polarization
graph the cultural bias is in the Dem / Lib camp.
The amplitude of temperature in the
first half of the
graph otherwise (1850 - 2000, say 1925)-- let us call it «status quo» for now — never rises
above -02.
Sadly, Prof. Salby's presentation did not include nearly enough information to reproduce the
graphs shown
above, so I will explain the flaw in his reasoning
first via a simple thought experiment, and then illustrate the mainstream understanding of this issue, that is based on the correlation between the annual growth rate and the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which was
first mentioned in the peer reviewed literature way back in 1979.
In the
first half of the
graph, you have 8 points
above the average and 10 points below the average.
If we look at the
first plot of seriousness vs. sentences (in the
graph above labeled Linear Regression: All Data Points), everything seems to be bunched up at the bottom of the
graph, which isn't ideal for a number of reasons.
This is what I expected when I
first posted the
above graph over a year ago.