On his part, counsel to the first accused, Mr Norrisson Quakers (SAN), aligned himself with the submissions of Owonikoko, and urged the court to
first hear applications touching on jurisdiction before proceeding.
Not exact matches
The
first JR concerns the decision by the Department for Infrastructure to accept the Company's Planning
Application and has a
hearing date in mid-June.
The
first was an
application to the Tribunal since 2007 was by Murray Goulburn; it was withdrawn before being
heard on 23 January 2014:
If you are a current client of ACO / AO and have had a pleasurable experience whilst being stepped through the
application process, all the way through to receiving your
first certificate of compliance, we would love to
hear your feedback!
The
application is the
first step in a process that could last up to six months, and involve court
hearings, expert witnesses and submissions from rival bidders and industry players.
However, Justice Hassan declined granting the
application, saying it would only be fair to
first hear from the EFCC.
He said the issue of jurisdiction ought to be determined
first before all other
applications would be
heard.
In his ruling, Justice Hassan agreed with the prosecution's submissions, saying since the accused had
applications on jurisdiction with regards to where they should be tried, as well as on fair
hearing, those
applications ought to be determined
first.
Counsel for Oba Akanbi had told the court that his client had several
applications before the court and he told the court that the notice of preliminary objection which bordered on competence and jurisdiction of the court should be
heard first before the substantive
application.
But counsel for the EFCC, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, maintained that the SANs had no right of
hearing in the court, since his
application was ex parte, wondering how they got wind of the move by the anti-graft agency in the
first place.
If you're
hearing about Jane Iredale for the very
first time (almost like me), the best way to explore the brand and to get to know it better is the Color Sample Kit * that combines 8 products under one compact roof of the palette plus two brushes for comfortable
application.
Companies will
hear of their
application status by mid-August, and dates / times will be assigned by the
first week of September.
Another
application that puts a key function of a phone at your fingertips is Visual Voicemail, which benefits customers by allowing them to select the voicemails they want to
hear first.
I am trying to figure out why I never
heard from them at the
first application process.
Yu said that often, the
first time older borrowers
hear that they still have a student loan is during the Social Security
application process, even though the report found that roughly 43 % of borrowers looking at garnishment have had their loans for over 20 years.
If the annual renewal
application and renewal fee is not received postmarked by December thirty -
first, the license shall lapse without a
hearing or notification, and the license shall not be reinstated; however, the person whose license has lapsed may apply for a new license.
Peppermint is not typically an oil that we think of
first with cats, however it is actually related to Catnip (both in the mint family)- and we
hear reports repeatedly of cats licking it off of their owners (after it is absorbed fully into their skin) or rubbing up against an
application site!
Be the
first to
hear about next year's Emerging Atlantic Canada Artist Residency call for
applications, sign up to our Visual Arts Creative Residencies newsletter here or visit banffcentre.ca / visual - digital - arts
Norton Rose Fulbright won the Asialaw Asia - Pacific International Arbitration Firm of the Year 2015, profiling a number of James» cases, including the successful defence of the
first ever
hearing of an HKIAC emergency arbitration
application with US$ 800m in dispute.
On the
first morning of Dutton's
application hearing, B.C. Civil Liberties Association Executive Director Josh Paterson, held a press conference with Dutton's lawyer Neil Chantler.
Although the victim will have the right to be
heard on an
application to vary or discharge a restraining order, this does not apply when the court is considering the imposition of a restraining order in the
first place.
The PLO sets out the four stages of a case: the issue of the
application and the
first hearing in the Family Proceedings Court, the Advocates Meeting and Case Management Conference, the Issue Resolution Hearing and the Final H
hearing in the Family Proceedings Court, the Advocates Meeting and Case Management Conference, the Issue Resolution
Hearing and the Final H
Hearing and the Final
HearingHearing.
The
application is due to be
heard for the
first time on 19 July.
Under the old regime, arbitration
applications in most instances were
first heard by the district courts.
Following a
hearing regarding claims made by seven claimants under TUPE on 6th and 7th May 2014, at the Bristol Employment Tribunal, at which the claimants succeeded, an
application was made by the Treasury Solicitors, who were acting on behalf of the
first respondents, for wasted costs under rules 80 — 82 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
Acumen IRP lawyers were successful in the leave - to - appeal
application in what was the
first hearing before the Supreme Court of Canada to deal with the legalities of the IRP DUI law.
Our lawyers have also been involved in many cases which have been the
first of their kind: They have, for example, submitted the
first - ever leniency
application in Finland (obtaining immunity from fines for the client); represented clients in the
first - ever oral
hearing of the Supreme Administrative Court in a competition case; and been lead counsel in precedent - setting, landmark (and the largest) competition damages cases — the
first major cartel damages cases in which court rulings have been rendered.
The
application, to be
heard early in 2014, is believed to be one of the
first cases where a Superior Court has been asked to address this issue directly since the Supreme Court findings in Telus, which provided a variety of opinions.
It was to be observed that (i) there was no express provision within the Disqualification Rules dealing with expert evidence; (ii) where a question of expert evidence did arise, the CPR provisions dealing with expert evidence would apply; (iii) it was within the scheme of the Disqualification Rules for a question or questions requiring expert evidence to be identified at the
first hearing of the
application and for the court at that stage to give directions for the filing and service of such evidence; and (iv) it followed that expert evidence ultimately used by a claimant in support of the
application or that a defendant ultimately wished the court to take into consideration might not have been filed and served by the
first hearing of the
application.
At the
first case management meeting, the parties appear before the judge who will
hear the
application.
This is the
first case where jurisdiction of the Canadian court is being challenged and the court has
heard the
application.
According to a recent USPTO trademark
application, Samsung has settled on the «Infinity Display» moniker, which we
first heard about back in February, to describe the nearly full - screen curved panels that'll ship on board the Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8 Plus.
Yep, that's what we thought too when we
first heard of personality tests, but believe it or not they are an actual thing and usually used by organisations who are expecting a lot of
applications for a job, such as graduate schemes.
If after sending your cover letter and your resume you don't
hear from the company in a couple of days, a quick «wanted to be sure you had received my
application» email is an entirely appropriate follow - up, even without telling them that you will be following up
first.
For this
application to be made the case must
first be
heard before the Board of the Adoption Authority of Ireland.
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at
hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte
hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon
first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead
first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on
application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained