Sentences with phrase «first is a distinction»

The first is a distinction between deployed and reserve weapons.

The Court reasoned that «to find discrimination there must first be a distinction drawn between the claimant and others....

Not exact matches

Wilson has the distinction of being the first actor to play Batman, starring in the 1943 series.

The first, important distinction is the type of potential new project, while the second is the degree to which construction has already begun.

First we must make one important distinction: Goop isn't suggesting that we all start coughing up cash to repel blood - sucking mythological vampires.

Now that I've made this distinction, we can cover the three things that you absolutely must do first if you're serious about generating some real money online.

Michelle Obama will be ceding the title of first lady to Melania Trump next month, but she may hold for some time the other distinction she earned during her time in the White House: America's best known advocate for healthy food.

But Mr. Ferguson has a special distinction: He was the first analyst Mr. Ackman hired at Pershing Square, and was the first investment team partner at the hedge fund.

Super Mario Run is listed as a free app in the App Store, but users who downloaded it were quick to discover that this distinction applies to only the first three levels of the game.

First portion that explains servant leadership is rich with stories and distinctions to help bring the practice to life.

United Technologies» CEO Gregory Hayes, the company's former finance chief who took the helm in late 2014, holds the distinction of being the first chief exec to strike a deal with now - President Trump after the November 2016 vote.

Despite that distinction, President Barack Obama is one of her biggest fans: In his speech last year pushing the Department of Labor to press on with its fiduciary standard rule, he pointed out Garrett by name as an FA who puts the best interests of her clients first.

-- A former Take - Two executive carries the dubious distinction of being the first chief executive to be convicted of backdating stock options.

The statement that began with the word «Unless» in the first paragraph is enormously important — because that distinction captures the primary lesson of our own awkward transition from 2009 to mid-2014 in our methods of estimating market return / risk profiles (see A Most Important Distinction, and A Better Lesson than This Time is distinction captures the primary lesson of our own awkward transition from 2009 to mid-2014 in our methods of estimating market return / risk profiles (see A Most Important Distinction, and A Better Lesson than This Time is Distinction, and A Better Lesson than This Time is Different).

She was also recognized as one of YWCA's 2012 Women of Distinction in Education, and became the first college president to be inducted into the Women's Executive Network ™ Hall of Fame after being named one of Canada's Most Powerful Women in 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2014.

The earth started to be prepared for life on earth beginning with the distinction of day and night and evening and morning ON the first day.

Theo and Vic What you are saying is we don't know what the first cause could possibly be, but because we believe in a supernatural god we will give him the distinction of creating the first cause.

The first is it misconstrues what a genetic division is supposed to be and the second is it neglects the distinction between becoming and being, between appearance and reality.

This distinction is even possible for people in faith - based professions, and this gentleman would not have been the first to tread this ground.

First, there is the distinction between contiguous and noncontiguous past occasions.

Whether the primitive misogyny was validated and fueled by religion or religion generated the misogyny in the first place is, in my opinion, too subtle a distinction to discern.

She is believed to be the first openly transgender person ever to be ordained by a Baptist church — a distinction that led MSNBC to speculate she might be «the most radical preacher in America.»

Your distinction that spiritual means knowledge first faith later is your particular definition.

First, it presses toward the elimination of any distinction (philosophical, political, and eventually legal) between relatively clear crimes against property and bodies and crimes against (for want of a better term) individual psychological well - being.

This distinction is often framed as the difference between spirituality (first - hand) and religion.

But the tendency to maintain a distinction between Jesus and God, attributing to them different ontological status, is strongest in the first and fourth, and the tendency to identify God with the revelation of God is strongest in the second and third, which in other ways seem to be most strongly opposed to one another.

But if the distinction between sacred and profane is the first principle of religion, there is also a second principle.

That distinction being presupposed, let us first ask what is to be said on the question of mutability or immutability of canon law and the Catholic style of life bound up with it, if we may so describe all the practices, rules, modes of behaviour in a Catholic's church life and his secular life lived on Christian lines, which hold good or previously held good through education, church precept etc..

In order to make some advance in the obscurity and complexity of the question, and to provide a guiding line for our reflections, a distinction must first be drawn, even though we can not but realize that the two poles of the distinction are linked by manifold connections of the most complicated kind.

This distinction was first suggested but not at all developed in my Searchfor Salvation (Downers Grove: InterVarsity press, 1978), PP. 39 - 40.

This principle is doubly relevant to the task at hand because it is characterized by Whitehead both as blurring the sharp distinction between universals and particulars and as constituting «the first step in the description of the universe as a solidarity of many actual entities» (PR 65).

First, as I note at Public Discourse today in» Kermit Gosnell and the Logic of «Pro-Choice,»» the most up - to - the - minute philosophers in bioethics are dispensing with any «sharp distinction,» as Jon puts it, between the unborn child and the one who has been born.

The basis upon which Whitehead has made his distinction into his nine «categories» is, I submit, that which Aristotle was the first to have clearly and systematically brought out.

The church - growth school has elevated to a «scientific principle» the distinction between inviting people to accept Christ and nurturing their life in Christ; the first part of the process is called «discipling»; the second, «perfecting.»

As the Benedictus Trust website explains: «In his book The Idea of a University Bl John Henry Cardinal Newman asserts that the primary purpose of a university should be to teach theoretical knowledge, following the distinction made by Aristotle in the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics between moral and intellectual virtues; the moral life concerned with practical knowledge and the intellectual life primarily concerned with theoretical knowledge — that is, «knowledge for the sake of itself».

This is the first distinction we make in our understanding of the word «revelation of God.»

[I Corinthians 14] John, a distinction is highlighted by your confession, «yes, all of scripture is in fact «cultural» — it is placed first and foremost within the cultural context of the readers».

Let us now turn back again to the first distinction we made, that the revelation is not any set of propositions about God but is the actual presence of the saving and sustaining power.

1) There are two distinctions we particularly have to consider: first, the modern pursuit of fame v. the pre-modern ambition for honorable greatness, second, celebrity as the key species of modern fame.

Finite spirit envisaged from the beginning and from its end, at least in the case of man, is «spirit in the world» or «cosmic spirit» and even with regard to the angels it will be appropriate for a Christian, and in the first place for a biblical, theology to see their distinction from mankind within this «cosmic spirituality» and not outside it or in contrast to it.

Descartes himself acknowledged that his cogito ergo sum is already fundamental in Augustine's philosophy (letter to Colvius, 14 November, 1640), and he believed that his philosophy was the first to demonstrate the philosophical truth of the doctrine of transubstantiation, and could go so far as to claim that scholastic philosophy would have been rejected as clashing with faith if his philosophy had been known first (letter to Mersenne, 31 March, 1641) Indeed, nothing is more revolutionary in modern philosophy than its dissolution of the scholastic distinction between natural theology and revealed theology.

In the first place, there is a wide zone of obscurity at the level of the zoological surface of hominization, seemingly impenetrable to our most searching methods of investigating the past, in which we can discern almost no outward evidence of the distinction between Irreflection and Reflection, although this had already been born.

But the way to fix that is not, I think, by bringing justification and sanctification closer together, since making the distinction in the first place only displays the problem.

Since they are close neighbors and business associates, the worshipers in the first churches find little religious or theological distinction between the two congregations, and some of them expressed discomfort with my attempt to discuss with them whatever differences there might be.

As we now turn to practical Modernism, which is best represented in American Protestantism, it must be pointed out first of all that it is possible to make only a theoretical distinction between these two types of Modernism.

First off, this ignores the distinction between Israelite indentured servants and foreign slaves which were explicitly described as personal property of the slave owner which could be passed on to the slave owner's descendants.

I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judgment, because there are many religious persons — some of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use of the distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential point of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered.

The latter distinction implies that there would be two kinds of laws: First, the laws applying to aggregational societies, which by definition have no overall experience and thereby no power of self - determination, would be absolute (or virtually so), so that predictability and repeatability would be (virtually) complete.

Rather, precisely in and though time must the distinction first be made between the Empty and the Real.

is at first not distinct from others but there emerges such a distinction between itself and others in its becoming first of all itself.