Sentences with phrase «first joint decision»

Not exact matches

The case, brought forward by the Gitga'at and other coastal First Nations, argued the province erred when it handed over decision - making authority for the project to the federal government under a provincial - federal Joint Review Process managed by the federal National Energy Board.

The first issue regarding how major life decision is made for the children is referred to as the form of legal decision - making and may be either sole legal decision - making, meaning one parent gets to make all of those decisions, or joint legal decision - making, meaning the parents must agree upon those issues.

It is true that the first immigration judge in his judgment mentioned joint purchase of Maya the cat as one of the many indications that the illegal immigrant had an established relationship with his partner — but it was not the reason for that judge's decision and in the judgment on appeal the cat was not even mentioned.

Destabilizing Elements (II) • The end of joint & several liability • Reinforced equal sharing / lockstep • Discourages flight — you remain liable for debts incurred while at the firm • With personal liability, incentive is to try to rehabilitate a declining firm • Without it, logic dictates early departure — first out the door • Most importantly: The end of periodic shared decisions to stay together

It is the first appellate decision in Canada following a joint trial conducted by a Canadian Court with a foreign Court.

In 2012 - 2014, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation before the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel, and in 2015 - 2016, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation and Kitasoo / Xai» xais during a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipeline.

Before involving a court of law in decisions involving joint legal custody, parents should first consider the best interest of the child.

While a number of researchers purport to have found relitigation rates lower following mediated decisions, or (primarily in early studies) in joint custody arrangements, not one of these studies appears to have corrected for (in the first case) the reality that negotiated agreements are not as legally amenable to modification as court orders, or (in both cases) that couples who achieved accord in mediation, as well as those who voluntarily chose early joint custody arrangements were already relatively more amicable couples.