Sentences with phrase «first make the claim»

Mr. Apaak, the Buila South MP, who first made the claim on Citi FM's «Big Issue», had promised to provide further evidence to back his claims.

They're now asking jobseekers who exit the failed Work Programme to take up literacy and numeracy training, three whole years after those people first make a claim for benefits.

FIRST You make a claim.

Oh, so first you made a claim about «MoveOn.org», and then when I called you on it, you changed it to a claim about «MoveOn and various other leftist organisations».

When the emergency medical & dental benefit is primary coverage, then the traveler has the choice of where to first make the claim.

Many people get denied Social Security disability benefits when they first make a claim.

Experts believe that if you have two plans — one individual and one floater, at the time of a claim, you should first make a claim on your individual health insurance plan and then move on to the family floater plan if the claim is higher.

Not exact matches

The order bars Lumosity from making claims that its games improve cognitive performance or stave off cognitive decline without first collecting scientific evidence from randomized, blinded and independent trials.

«We are disappointed by the fact that such serious claims have been made publicly, without any proof being presented and without any attempt by the United Kingdom to clarify the situation with the Russian side in the first place.»

If you hear from someone claiming to be from the IRS, though, first make sure that the contact isn't a scam.

First, make sure all your local profiles are claimed — get on every social - media platform you can find as well as local directories like Google My Business, Yelp and TripAdvisor.

China can not claim the moral high ground on trade matters; in fact, there is a strong case to be made that American voters» resentment of China's unfair trade practices is what put Trump in the White House in the first place.

From the secret to snagging an entire row of seats on the plane, to rigging your suitcase so it (hopefully) appears at the baggage claim first, here's a bunch of clever little tricks that make traveli...

Business Insider spoke and communicated with multiple people who claim they were close to the attack since it was first made public on October 22.

Essentially what this means is that the bill will allow the patent office to review the validity and scope of more patents in the first place, which, in turn, may make a patent troll's claim baseless.

They make fat cells smaller and they prevent them from growing back again, so the claim is that the first slimming results are measurable after already four weeks.»

It's not the first time North Korea has raised eyebrows when making manufacturing claims.

Whatever the cause, every VC firm that pitched claimed to put the entrepreneur first, but Jon actually made me believe it by illuminating his firm's investment philosophy and the management team's entrepreneurial backgrounds.

Hot Tip: The major perk of the card is that it offers this benefit as primary coverage, which means you do not need to make a claim with your personal insurance first, while other credit cards mostly offer secondary coverage, which only covers anything above what your personal insurance will cover first.

The first potentially false claim made by Mr. Young was that, «if the tar sands plan goes through until the end, the industrial area will be the size of England.»

The report claimed that Goldman Sachs is positioned to become the first Wall Street firm to make markets in digital currencies, citing unnamed insiders and a potential launch date of June 2018.

It's not the first time Trump has made a wild claim, but in this case he's right, by one very important measure — the corporate statutory tax rate.

Each company seems to be going back and forth, making claims against their rival app company in what appears to be the first major public spat between the ride - sharing apps.

Within a few weeks, the film will be available in more theatres and may quickly surpass the first Taken's revenues, a claim which analysts and film executives at 20th Century Fox are confident in making.

And is not Rutledge the one giving the other side an unearned advantage when he suggests that secularists can make a special claim to ownership of the First Amendment?

Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.

she wasnt asking to eat the kings son (as you first claimed), she was complaining to the king that she had made a deal with the women to eat here son first, then hers.

I already responded to this issue... and even if I accepted that there was a first cause (which I don't)... it wouldn't matter, you a make a whole baseless claim beyond that.

First, Connelly argues, the population - control movement was wrong as a matter of fact: «The two strongest claims population controllers make for their long - term historical contribution» are «that they raised Asia out of poverty and helped keep our planet habitable.»

@Chad «the argument doesn't make that claim that the first cause if the God of Israel

I would still like to know why saying «I don't know» is anywhere near making a claim of a first cause or especially an agency of first cause.

--------------- Before you make an illogical claim like that, first prove to me that «nothing» ever existed by showing me «nothing» in its natural habitat.

What's more, you make these claims without the first piece of evidence in support.

We claim to honour the «least of these» and to be a people who lay down power, who believe that the greatest is the servant, and that the way to really get ahead in the Kingdom of God is to put others first, to amplify other voices, to make room at the table.

The ideological climate is beginning to change and it is possible to make oneself heard through other means and to claim the first victories as in the case of the MAT, a victory which is yet to be confirmed.

Gender ideology seemed a ridiculous and improbable threat when I first considered its claims of male brains trapped in female bodies, but its rapid ascendancy in law and public opinion has made the term «transgender» a household word.

Jesus certainly made no such claim about his origin; and there exists no first - person testimony by Mary his mother.

Finally, aware of the religious dimensions of the texts, they are able to appreciate how claims to ultimate significance are inevitably forged in terms that are anthropologically rooted, historically conditioned and literarily defined; on the other hand, for the first time, many of them come to perceive Christianity as in fact making a number of extremely interesting religious claims.

First - off numbnuts, being an atheist is not a religion, we do not claim to be all knowing (actually just the opposite), never once claimed to be all powerful but the reasoning part is the bane of our debates because the religious are not reasoning, they are being emotional and make baseless claims.

Instead of allowance being made for my dyslexia, she did put it down not to others but to me doing the mistreating claiming that she was being prophetic and that she was acting s such because «God deals with those in power in the first instance and men have the power».

And Paul is making claims about «all flesh» and «every person» and about the «power of the gospel to save» that go beyond the specific cultural conditions of Jews and gentiles in the first century — his language demands to be engaged with at the anthropological / theological level.

Let's first go back to the claim you actually made: that all of these field will obviously, if purused without bias, support your particular worldview.

==== you then made this utter nonsense claim, which was refuted in two manners, first showing that there has been minimal Christian violence, second showing that your «for any god» statement is utter nonsense as there is significant violence by Muslims.

Protestant - Catholic - Jew made two large claims» that America contained a «triple melting pot» and that the religious revival of the 1950s was essentially superficial» though really only the first is much remembered.

True - we don't yet understand how the first cells self - replicated, but we don't go off and make outlandish claims about how that happened either.

The first observation that we make concerning this statement is that it does not claim that the Bible itself is an infallible revelation.

To say that the claims that are based off of a book were created after the book was first written is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an error in trying to convey your thoughts).

Also, this «Big Bang confirms Jewdeo - Christian genesis» claim has been made before... the first time by the Pope when Big Bang was first proposed by a Belgian physicist and a catholic priest named Georges Lemaître, who actually came up with the name Big Bang.

First, the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights has been making free exercise arguments for abortion for twenty years, and these claims were routinely rejected even by pro-choice courts, even before Smith.

On first consideration, it seems that the only claim that can legitimately be made is merely the Aristotelian claim that the first entity becomes like the second.