Sentences with phrase «first opinion work»

During this time he also did locum first opinion work in a wide variety of small animal practices.

Not exact matches

«The Committee is of the opinion that the PBO works first for parliamentarians and parliamentary committees,» the committee explained, «and it is they who ultimately control the publication of the work done at their request.»

If the scientific community really worked that way, you wouldn't have an internet to voice your opinion on in the first place.

Several introductory chapters on the Court and its work, the historical background of the First Amendment and the American experiment in religious freedom, and a few of the leading themes help to put the (mercifully) heavily edited excerpts of the Court's opinions in context.

They not only have no clue as to how our government works or what it takes to change laws, they wouldn't know a good president from a hole in the ground if they didn't first ask their pastor or fox news pundit their opinion.

In my opinion, to follow Jesus is to put all that aside and put the needs of others first, working together to help fix the hurt and suffering in the world as much as we can.

Perhaps, in the case of the one who continues to smoke (or whatever), there are other, more pressing issues in their life that God wants to work on with them first, and the smoking is a lower priority in God's opinion — to be dealt with later, if at all.

Victor Lowe, a very careful student of Whitehead's life and works, and the first to employ the systematic approach, is of the same opinion: «From what Whitehead said in his first lectures, it appears that most of the key ideas of his mature philosophy where in his mind when he arrived from England; they needed precise verbalization, review, and further development into a system» (ANW - 2 145).

I used my Vitamix to make mine and it worked well in my opinion, but after reading other bloggers» experiences, you may want to try a food processor first.

Alexis in his second season after a freakishly brilliant start, Ozil coming in to consistent form at the end of his second season, Coq now with a proper body of work under his belt and a whole summer to work on it, Bellerin with his first season jitters out of his system, Giroud finally realising he might be a pretty decent striker, Gab with some solid performances and the close - season to bond further, Monreal maturing in to an unspectacular but tremendously solid FB, Ospina settled — it is my opinion that these and others will be what will bring the bigger improvements and the consistency needed next year rather than any wholesale changes.

I'm of the opinion that Juventus need to be almost flawlessly clinical against Real in the final, and that certainly wasn't the case on Tuesday night: Gonzalo Higuain missed a golden opportunity in the first half, and then completely flubbed a volley attempt in the second half; right before the Dani Alves goal, Paulo Dybala had a chance to put the icing on the cake and failed; Mario Mandžukić, before he stuffed in his own rebound — which I don't want to take away from, because the window of space with which he had to work was not very big, and he tapped it home with a fair bit of dexterity — missed a golden opportunity, with credit to the keeper.

Like I said in my first comment, this is your opinion and what worked for you but people should not take this as a rule that this will fix the issues they might have, especially not sleep issues.

I retract my first sentence and unreservedly apologise to Curt — nobody with a serious interest in space flight should have their work compared to posts by (a well known space flight forum troll whose name should not be uttered) simply for stating a genuine opinion.

When we first started the business, Taylor and I worked in a commercial kitchen together, which we quickly realized was a bad idea because we have opposite opinions on cleanliness and would argue about it every night after we got home.

First off, in my opinion, you are doing a ton of cardio... basically 18 miles per week give or take; not including the interval work on the weekends.

The service is free to use and its only disadvantage in my opinion is that you have to sign in first as the search function only works for registered users.

On the Criterion blog «On Five,» DVD producer Kim Hendrickson writes about working with Bertolucci on preparing their lavish four - disc edition and Bertolucci's remark that the longer TV version «in my opinion is not much different from the other one, just a little bit more boring...» According to the commentary track on the disc, the TV version was actually completed first and then Bertolucci continued to pare down and shape the film to his ultimate version.

Stashuk still appreciates that Mann took the time to speak to his wife (he wanted her opinion of the title change from Red Dragon), while Shaffer, who handled the «dark, metallic sounds» (like the cue attending Dolarhyde's «P.O.V.» in the opening shot — incidentally Mann's first use of video in a feature), credits Mann's work ethic with improving his own.

When it comes to nailing the look of these characters, Meinerding also added, «In my opinion, it's much, much more difficult to find the first version of the character — more or less because the tone of those movies are still being worked out.

Paul Greengrass took over the franchise after that first movie and has been given mad props for his work, but Liman started this series and constantly gets overshadowed in my opinion.

Before sharing the bench, they watched one another's careers closely — one of O'Connor's first written opinions relied so heavily on Ginsburg's prior work, Martin Ginsburg jokingly asked his wife if she'd written it.

I'm giving you my opinion as a publisher and my knowledge of how these types of negotiations work from a first - hand perspective... not hype...

In order to make the critical assessment of any subject or work, it is uttermost important to read it first and understand each of the key opinions of the authors and experts in that particular field of study.

I found his whole story fascinating: the way he was first recruited at Gallup to leak public opinion and political polling data to British intelligence, and then brought into the BSC to use his expertise in counter espionage work, and later used the same techniques to make a fortune on Madison Avenue.

It is possible to ask the agents or acquisition editors questions that can help steer your work toward success such as: will my work sell in today's market, what is the agent - writer relationship really like, or ask their opinion on the first page of your manuscript.

News & Notes is a weekly Saturday post featuring book - and publishing - related news, links to interesting articles and opinion pieces, and other cool stuff Book News Ancient Egyptian works to be published together in English for first time (The Guardian) Amazon plans to open bookstore in Chicago (Chicago Tribune) Navy Seal... Read more»

In my opinion, it's extremely difficult for self - published authors, especially first - time authors, to appear in these lists as most self - published authors don't have their work published in book stores.

Whether it's during the first draft or just before you send it out to an editor, get your work out to reliable folks who will give an honest opinion of the work.

The first and most important in my opinion is just being able to reach your readership and know your work is out there being read and appreciated.

Post your finished first draft and you'll have dozens of willing beta readers, waiting to give their opinion on your work.

While I have a biased opinion [Harper Collins was among the first major publishers to work with Shelfie, or BitLit as it was called at the time], I think this is to their long - term advantage.

After graduating in 2011, I began working in a first - opinion exotic and small animal practice, before moving on to a larger practice where I helped develop the exotics caseload.

She worked in first opinion practice before completing an internship at the RVC, after which she pursued a residency in Emergency and Critical Care Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in the USA.

She has worked in first opinion and referral exotic practices and has completed the RCVS Certificate in Advanced Veterinary Practice (Zoological medicine).

I work in Surrey in first opinion practice, I mentor candidates taking the Medicine of Cats examination.

We work in partnership with you to become a seamless extension of your first - opinion veterinary service.

A graduate of the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, she previously worked in a referral hospital in the Catalonian city and at a first - opinion practice in Liverpool.

The first option definitely works and is the most sure - fire method to obtain an additional sign - up bonus in my opinion.

I have loved her work from the time I first saw it forty years ago, so I am certainly a very biased opinion.

Critic Jean - Christophe Ammann has suggested that the crux of Holzer's work lies in the fact that, «At first reading it may elicit agreement, rejection or indifference, yet simultaneously it asserts the difficulties with which one forms an opinion in an ambiguous situation, and forces the reader to at least try to sort himself out.»

Anyhow, as you suggest, I'll first work to understand the GISS process well enough to have an opinion on the method's validity relative to its intended purpose (and other possible uses).

Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate Scientists about how important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the science.

First: Gleick's critical thinking skills are sadly lacking, which should call into question any scientific work or opinions he has offered (and those of anyone that didn't spot the fake after reading it).

Whether or not Mann's work shows all that he has claimed is not the question, for the First Amendment protects robust discussion and debate of scientific matters and the freedom to express wrong - headed opinions in inartful ways.

Regrettably, your colleagues in the liberal environmental movement responded at first by pretending we don't exist, and when opinion polls and political decisions revealed that strategy wasn't working, by denouncing us as «deniers» and «shills for the fossil fuel industry.»

In my opinion, while the techniques used in the original Mann et al papers may have been slightly flawed, the work was the first of its kind and deserves considerable credit for moving the field of paleoclimate research forward.

But these are the people I want to know, but even that is changing, because the power elite have caught on, and are letting these ex-cia whistle blower suppose to be fresh out of jail, (who even really knows they were in jail) speak on TV and The Internet, which really wouldn't happen, They would have to wait ten years and write a book, and that would have to be reviewed first by the cia, you see what I am saying, disinformation; this is exactly how disinformation works, Mix lies and truth, or truth and lies, either way, YOU MUST DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, and LOOK AND READ MANY DIFFERENT OPINIONS..

It is the first such study to work with a long section of opinions on this issue.

When the upper - level externs go off to work on opinions in judges» chambers, they use attorneys» written product and, almost always for the first time, have a first - hand experience of what users need.

At any point, a client is free to seek out another lawyer to get a second opinion on the first lawyer's legal strategy, to instruct the lawyer to offer firm quotes, or to stop work on a matter that is getting out of hand.