Sentences with phrase «first referred questions»

Gallivan, who chairs the Crime Victims, Crime and Corrections committee and is vice chair of the Education Committee, at first referred questions to Flanagan.

Having thus answered the first referred question in the affirmative, AG Cruz Villalon then analyzed the question of whether Member State authorities» treatment with regard to the freedom of movement may be different for beneficiaries of different kinds of international protection, or for beneficiaries of international protection and other third country nationals.

Not exact matches

The first whisper to me from the Holy Spirit was a question, «do you love him (referring to my husband)?

This unalterable and eternal despot is the origin of totalitarianism, and represents the first cringing human attempt to refer all difficult questions to the smoking and forbidding altar of a Big Brother.»

A category system is therefore first referred to a definite given perception, and only with respect to it does there first arise the question of a universal conceptual system referring to any perception whatsoever.

The first question was aimed at the fact that after A.D. 100 the churches (In this essay, the word «church» is capitalized when it refers to the entire Christian community.

The Court, if it had wished to rely upon Jefferson to determine the true and original intent of the First Amendment, could have served themselves and the American people well by referring to Jefferson's warning to Judge William Johnson regarding the de-ter-min-ation of the original intent of a statute or a con - st - itu - tion On every question of con - struc - tion, carry ourselves back to the time when the Con - st - itu - tion was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.»

Since God transcends any of the categories of human intelligence into which we may try to fit Him, the only question is whether we do less injustice to His majesty by referring to Him in personal pronouns, or by using impersonal abstract nouns, such as «Ground of Being» and «First Cause.»

The book in question, The Sword in the Stone, was the first volume in what was to become a tetralogy of very loose adaptations from Malory (its author referred to it as «a preface»).

I was only referring to downsides for the individual in question, not situations like driving on a given substance, which I misread the first time.

At first I thought Kelsey was refering to individual contracts but if you look further up you will notice that he was answering another question.

The first question was «How do you refer to your role when working in parent education?»

When faced with these questions, the first thing that many of us do is refer to a set of guidelines... a «feeding table», showing the age of a child and how many teaspoons / tablespoons of food he is likely to be consuming at that age.

In her first Prime Minister's Questions, Theresa May told Corbyn: «You refer to me as the second woman prime minister.

Schneiderman spokesman Eric Koch, to whom the statement is attributed, draws first blood by referring to the Manhattan senator was a «lifelong progressive Democrat» — a phrase intended to both 1) draw attention to the fact that Rice used to be a Republican, and 2) subtly call into question her claim (made at the DRC straw poll this weekend) that she has the «heart» of a Democrat.

12:02 - «They can even plant questions at short notice,» Cameron says, referring to the first questioner, who gave Brown a chance to address the topic in a favourable way.

A spokesman for Mark - Viverito referred questions on the probe, which was first reported by Crain's Insider, to her campaign.

For the first question, yes its referring to reps per set.

The first is a syllabus outline with reference to set texts and key ideas, the second column is made of key questions and the final column refers to the set texts of each unit.

The debate on balancing as a moral and legal approach are numerous, but two main questions that are always requestioned and re-examined are first juridical - philosophical question that refers on the nature of balancing, whether it is a rational procedure for applying norms or a mere rhetorical device.

Moe refers to the first question as «biased,» while he finds the second one «actually informative and neutral, precisely the kind of item that should have been used all along.»

On the first question, education finance scholars often point to three related concepts, referred to as horizontal equity, vertical equity and equal opportunity.

As you address the questions that follow, (you can preview all 99 Questions here), you'll probably find yourself referring back to your answer to the first question as you dig deeper into your writing and publishingquestions that follow, (you can preview all 99 Questions here), you'll probably find yourself referring back to your answer to the first question as you dig deeper into your writing and publishingQuestions here), you'll probably find yourself referring back to your answer to the first question as you dig deeper into your writing and publishing options.

A: That comes under the category of a misdemeanor, and the question is whether it is a misdemeanor in the first degree or second degree and that's why it was referred to the state attorney.

At first glance their work seems to refer to familiar situations but on further investigation these references are brought into question.

This project encapsulated what its curator Anselm Franke refers to as «undead histories»: those lacking sufficient authority to question officially sanctioned narratives, or simply without the financial support or infrastructure to be exhibited in the first place.

A question; above the first graph is referred to as SOD 1.5.

This comment contains the other questions I referred to in my first comment (which is currently awaiting moderation).

Hi, I am fully aware of the current climate changes phenomenon linked to the increasing CO2 concentration (and for the first time due to the increasing CO2 concentration) but my question does not refers directly to this issue (sorry for that).

The court of first instance of Brussels (Interim Decision of 17 May 2013, 196 / 33/13, in Dutch, not online) decided to refer a preliminary question to Luxembourg concerning the consistency of Council Regulation 1964/2005 regarding import tariffs for bananas with the EU's obligations under the GATT.

With its first question, the referring court asks whether the victim of defamatory remarks can bring an action for rectification and removal of information in any Member State where that information was accessible.

Trauger referred to the defendants» «convincing» argument that if the First Amendment was interpreted otherwise, any network targeting particular demographic groups such as the Lifetime Network (females), the Black Entertainment Channel (African - Americans), Telemundo (Latinos), and others would be called into question.

41 Therefore, on the one hand, provided that the selection or arrangement of the data --- namely, in a case such as the one in the main proceedings, data corresponding to the date, the time and the identity of teams relating to the different fixtures of the league concerned (see paragraph 26 of the present judgment)- — is an original expression of the creativity of the author of the database, it is irrelevant for the purpose of assessing the eligibility of the database for the copyright protection provided for by Directive 96/9 whether or not that selection or arrangement includes «adding important significance» to that data, as mentioned in section (b) of the referring court's first question.

By its first two questions, the referring court, the Rechtbank Midden - Nederland (District Court, Midden - Nederland, Netherlands), asks in essence whether the selling of a device such as the Filmspeler, which includes pre-installed software containing links to streaming websites with unlawful content, constitutes an act of communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3 InfoSoc Directive, and whether this assessment is influenced by the fact that:

It first narrowed the multiple questions referred by the Irish and Austrian courts down to one over-arching issue, whether the Data Retention Directive is valid in light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 of the Charter (setting out the rights to privacy, data protection and freedom of expression respectively).

Subsequently, the AG addresses the first question of the Swedish referring court, regarding the compatibility of a general data retention obligation with Article 15 (1) of Directive 2002 / 58 / EC (the Directive on privacy and electronic communications) and Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter.

The AG suggested, in reference to the first question referred for a preliminary ruling, that the Court must declare that it has jurisdiction for the main reason that the HTSs should be regarded as acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union for the purposes of Article 267 of the Treaty on the functioning of the Union («TFEU»), which is the primary law basis of the cooperation between the CJEU and the national courts via the preliminary ruling system.

On the first point (the lack of an obligation to refer questions for an advisory opinion), the EFTA Court rather suddenly brought the duty of loyal cooperation into play.

The question is: do the documents in dispute, ie, MSP and Pharmanet, come withing the terms of either Rule 7 - 1 (1)(a), ie, documents that can be used by a party of record to prove or disprove a material fact or that will be referred to at trial or, if not, do they come under category 7 - 1 (11), generally, in the vernacular, referred to as the Guano documents... There is no question that there is a higher duty on a party requesting documents under the second category... that in addition to requesting, they must explain and satisfy either the party being demanded or the court, if an order is sought, with an explanation «with reasonable specificity that indicates the reason why such additional documents or classes of documents should be disclosed», and again, there is no doubt that the new Rules have limited the obligation for production in the first instance to the first category that I have described and has reduced or lessened the obligation for production in general...

In its preliminary ruling given on September 9th 2015 pursuant to a reference by the Court of First Instance, Lisbon (Varas Civeis de Lisboa)[1] the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) elaborated on the notion of» transfer of a business» in light of Directive 2001/23 and in that respect also dwelled on the obligation of the Portuguese Supreme Court to refer the question to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling.

The Court of First Instance, Lisbon (Varas Civeis de Lisboa) referred the question for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU as a result of an action against the Portuguese State brought by the claimants since the Portuguese Supreme Court deemed the legal issue in question to be sufficiently clear and it decided that there was no need to refer the matter to the CJEU even though it was a court of last instance.

The acte clair doctrine, first articulated in Cilfit (C - 283 / 81), states that in accordance with article 267 TFEU, a national court against whose judgment there is no higher appeal must refer a question to the ECJ when a question on the interpretation of EU law arises, unless the answer is «so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt».

The same correction as that referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 of this Article shall be applied to the number of representatives to be elected in the Member States in question.

The Court of First Instance shall not be competent to hear and determine questions referred for a preliminary ruling under Article 234.

The Divisional Court had considered the question to be whether circumstances had changed since the original sentence was passed, suggesting the DPP must first consider whether there had been a change of circumstances, and, if so, refer the case in the interests of justice.

80 In the light of all of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that EU law — in particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional upon that national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.

62 The answer to the second question should therefore be that Article 9 of the directive is to be interpreted as meaning that the activities referred to at points (a) to (d) of the first question, relating to data from documents which are in the public domain under national legislation, must be considered as activities involving the processing of personal data carried out «solely for journalistic purposes», within the meaning of that provision, if the sole object of those activities is the disclosure to the public of information, opinions or ideas.

First, it can refer to the basic sales question of -LSB-...]

Write things down such as recommended web pages or set up processes that are of basic importance — it will help you remember the vast amounts of information you will receive in your first days, and you can refer to your notes later, as opposed to asking repetitive questions.

Pharm techs are frequently the first point of contact for customer questions, from phone calls to prescription pick - ups, though specific questions about medications are typically referred to the pharmacist.