Sentences with phrase «first subject of discussion»

Our first subject of discussion will be Steve James» acclaimed documentary about Roger called «Life Itself,» (scheduled to open in America on July 4, 2014).

Not exact matches

Spoiler Alert: To my surprise, the first sentence of the opinion's discussion section said, «As explained below, the Court has determined that the Asserted Claims are not directed to patentable subject matter.»

Much of the discussion of the first directive has concentrated on the issue of non-violence, but it also says that «the lives of animals and plants... deserve protection, preservation and care».18 The church's record on this issue has been subject to criticism, and certainly modern European society has tended to exploit the natural world and to emphasize the gap between human and other forms of life.

In our discussion we shall ask first what theological statements can be made on the subject of private prayer, examining afterwards if liturgical prayer (as distinct from the Eucharist and the administration of the sacraments with which we are not here concerned) can be preferred to it at all, and if so, what such a preference means for the practice of the Christian life.

With this analogy in mind, Enns moves on to apply it to the first of three Old Testament «problems» — the Old Testament and Ancient Near Eastern Literature — which will be the subject of next week's discussion.

* Day 1 Monday, February 22, 2016 4:00 PM -5:00 PM Registration & Networking 5:00 PM — 6:00 PM Welcome Reception & Opening Remarks Kevin de Leon, President pro Tem, California State Senate Debra McMannis, Director of Early Education & Support Division, California Department of Education (invited) Karen Stapf Walters, Executive Director, California State Board of Education (invited) 6:00 PM — 7:00 PM Keynote Address & Dinner Dr. Patricia K. Kuhl, Co-Director, Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences * Day 2 Tuesday February 23, 2016 8:00 AM — 9:00 AM Registration, Continental Breakfast, & Networking 9:00 AM — 9:15 AM Opening Remarks John Kim, Executive Director, Advancement Project Camille Maben, Executive Director, First 5 California Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, California Department of Education 9:15 AM — 10:00 AM Morning Keynote David B. Grusky, Executive Director, Stanford's Center on Poverty & Inequality 10:00 AM — 11:00 AM Educating California's Young Children: The Recent Developments in Transitional Kindergarten & Expanded Transitional Kindergarten (Panel Discussion) Deborah Kong, Executive Director, Early Edge California Heather Quick, Principal Research Scientist, American Institutes for Research Dean Tagawa, Administrator for Early Education, Los Angeles Unified School District Moderator: Erin Gabel, Deputy Director, First 5 California (Invited) 11:00 AM — 12:00 PM «Political Will & Prioritizing ECE» (Panel Discussion) Eric Heins, President, California Teachers Association Senator Hannah - Beth Jackson, Chair of the Women's Legislative Committee, California State Senate David Kirp, James D. Marver Professor of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley Assemblyman Kevin McCarty, Chairman of Subcommittee No. 2 of Education Finance, California State Assembly Moderator: Kim Pattillo Brownson, Managing Director, Policy & Advocacy, Advancement Project 12:00 PM — 12:45 PM Lunch 12:45 PM — 1:45 PM Lunch Keynote - «How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity, and the Hidden Power of Character» Paul Tough, New York Times Magazine Writer, Author 1:45 PM — 1:55 PM Break 2:00 PM — 3:05 PM Elevating ECE Through Meaningful Community Partnerships (Panel Discussion) Sandra Guiterrez, National Director, Abriendo Purtas / Opening Doors Mary Ignatius, Statewide Organize of Parent Voices, California Child Care Resource & Referral Network Jacquelyn McCroskey, John Mile Professor of Child Welfare, University of Southern California School of Social Work Jolene Smith, Chief Executive Officer, First 5 Santa Clara County Moderator: Rafael González, Director of Best Start, First 5 LA 3:05 PM — 3:20 PM Closing Remarks Camille Maben, Executive Director, First 5 California * Agenda Subject to Change

The rumours on social media became the subject of several discussions in the country and beyond after the Member of Parliament (MP) for New Juaben North, Mark Assibey - Yeboah urged persons duped in the scam to blame it on the first family.

It's allowing me to control lots of cortisol, even though it's not necessarily an ideal scenario, and I wan na highlight the fact that I have never preached that doing the Spartan triathlons all the time, and subjecting the body to masochistic feats of endurance, or climbing your own personal Mt. Everest is something healthy, but I think that one cool thing, if you can pull it off, and what's kinda leading to this discussion in the first place is, if you can keep yourself healthy, or as healthy as possible while living life as full as you want to live it, then I think that you can potentially tap into the best of both worlds.

Although I've touched on this subject a little in previous posts, this is my first in - depth discussion of what this process has been like for me.

GONYEA: With the taxi driver - obviously, your most famous creation is that character, Travis Bickle, played by, of course, Robert De Niro, but many of your films have - while they have varied in subject matter, in a panel discussion following a screening this week of «First Reformed,» you talked about how you keep returning to, kind of, a version of Travis Bickle's character.

GET OUT An unbelievable achievement from a first time director and a film which has inspired discussion around an important subject in the way that the best horror / suspense films always do, utilising subversion and subtlety instead of bombast and realism.

When I first came across discussion of this concept, I pondered what mine should be, especially since my writing interests cover a huge variety of subjects, as well as tee shirt and novelty item designs.

The subject of narrative - heavy titles was preceded by a discussion on a possible Netflix for video games, or a similar subscription service that offers more long - term game support, something Spencer and Shannon Loftis, Xbox's first - party publishing GM, have been considering for quite some time.

I have become very interested in Alex Hubbards» work, having first seen a painting of his at the Indiscipline show at the Mead Gallery, his work was also one of the a subjects of discussion at the event with Bob Nickas entitled The Trouble with Harry, at Mead on 3 March 2012, where the show Eat Your Friends at Simon Lee Gallery, London was recommended and I got to visit it last week.

When: Thursday, April 19, free with advance RSVP, 6:30 Why: In conjunction with the publication of the first monograph on Philip Taaffe as part of the Lund Humphries Contemporary Painters series, the Cooper Union is hosting the panel discussion «Rewriting Painting» on April 19 at 6:30, featuring Cooper graduates, artists, and Lund Humphries subjects Lois Dodd, Thomas Nozkowski, and Philip Taaffe along with critics Barry Schwabsky (the editor of the Lund Humphries series), Faye Hirsch (who wrote the book on Dodd), and John Yau (who wrote the book on Taaffe).

Of course quality was the first selection criterion to bring these 36 artists from different countries together, but for curator Janice Whittle there was another important reason to select the artists she liked to present: she wanted to give the floor to artists who have not had many chances over the years to show their work because of the limited infrastructure of the island: Barbados — as most of the Caribbean countries — does not have a museum for modern or contemporary art; a National Gallery has been a subject for discussion for countless years, but it never got of the ground; the Queen's Park Gallery — a governmentally managed institution — was closed for years and commercial galleries came and wenOf course quality was the first selection criterion to bring these 36 artists from different countries together, but for curator Janice Whittle there was another important reason to select the artists she liked to present: she wanted to give the floor to artists who have not had many chances over the years to show their work because of the limited infrastructure of the island: Barbados — as most of the Caribbean countries — does not have a museum for modern or contemporary art; a National Gallery has been a subject for discussion for countless years, but it never got of the ground; the Queen's Park Gallery — a governmentally managed institution — was closed for years and commercial galleries came and wenof the limited infrastructure of the island: Barbados — as most of the Caribbean countries — does not have a museum for modern or contemporary art; a National Gallery has been a subject for discussion for countless years, but it never got of the ground; the Queen's Park Gallery — a governmentally managed institution — was closed for years and commercial galleries came and wenof the island: Barbados — as most of the Caribbean countries — does not have a museum for modern or contemporary art; a National Gallery has been a subject for discussion for countless years, but it never got of the ground; the Queen's Park Gallery — a governmentally managed institution — was closed for years and commercial galleries came and wenof the Caribbean countries — does not have a museum for modern or contemporary art; a National Gallery has been a subject for discussion for countless years, but it never got of the ground; the Queen's Park Gallery — a governmentally managed institution — was closed for years and commercial galleries came and wenof the ground; the Queen's Park Gallery — a governmentally managed institution — was closed for years and commercial galleries came and went.

Take heart in the fact that you're all actually discussing the ethics in the first place, which is far more than can be said for those who have celebrated and misrepresented the contents of a certain stolen ZIP file, and whose ethical discussions on that subject are rather sparse, if not non-existent.

From the EGU.eu website» after having passed a rapid access peer review process manuscripts submitted to EGU two - stage - journals will be published first of all in the «Discussions» part of the website of that journal being then subject to interactive public discussions initiated by alerting the corresponding scientificDiscussions» part of the website of that journal being then subject to interactive public discussions initiated by alerting the corresponding scientificdiscussions initiated by alerting the corresponding scientific community.

This blog post has provided a first reaction to merely a few of the many considerable points set down by the European Council guidelines, which shall undoubtedly be the subject of much discussion and analysis in the coming days and weeks.

Because of the subject matter, the workplace context and all the recent legislation, cases and discussions in Canada and the United States on harassment, for the first time I was conscious of possible repercussions from forwarding such email (specifically, participating in creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment).

The first part of this argument is, of course, subject to serious and wide - ranging discussion and debate among the chattering (and blogging classes).

It is the responsibility of each member in the first instance to avoid raising improper subjects for discussion.